Random regression test-day milk yield models as a suitable alternative to the traditional 305-day lactation model for genetic evaluation of Sahiwal cattle
390 / 146
Keywords:
305-day milk yield, Lactation model, Random regression, Sahiwal, Test-day milk yieldAbstract
In the present study, first three lactation 305-day milk yield variance components, genetic parameters and breeding value were estimated using test-day milk yield and 305-day actual milk yield data of Sahiwal cattle. The estimates were obtained using three methods viz. random regression model (RRM) with homogeneous residual variance (RRM-HOM), RRM with heterogeneous residual variance (RRM-HET) and univariate animal model. The additive genetic variance of 305-day milk yield estimated from RRM was higher compared to univariate animal model for all lactation. From RRM, it was possible to account for permanent environmental effects due to individual milk yield variations during lactation. The heritability estimates were low for first (0.072 to 0.079) and third lactation (0.087 to 0.112) 305-day milk yield from all three methods. For second lactation, low heritability estimate from univariate animal model (0.144) and moderate estimate from different RRM (0.206 to 0.219) were obtained. For all lactation, breeding value rank correlation was more than 0.78 between lactation model and random regression testday model. The same bull was identified as top ranking bull from all three methods. It can be concluded that random regression test-day models can replace conventional 305-day lactation model for genetic evaluation as it resulted in higher additive genetic variance estimates, gave similar/higher heritability value and moderate to high rank correlation estimates for breeding values.Downloads
References
Cilek S, Orhan H, Kaygisiz A and Sahin E H. 2008. Estimation of breeding values of Anatolian population of Simmental cows using monthly test-day milk yields. Archive Zootechnica 11: 79–85.
Gupta A. 2013. ‘Genetic evaluation of Sahiwal cattle using lactation curve models’. Ph.D Thesis, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India.
Hossein-Zadeh N G. 2012. Estimation of genetic parameters and trends for energy-corrected 305-d milk yield in Iranian Holsteins. ArchivTierzucht 55: 420–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-55-420-2012
Jaffrézic F, White I M S, Thompon R and Hill W G. 2000. A link function approach to model heterogeneity of residual variances over time in lactation curve analyses. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 1089–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74973-3
Kaygisiz A. 2013. Estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values for dairy cattle using test-day milk yield records. Journal of Animal and Plant Science 23: 345–49.
Kirkpatrick M, Lofsvold D and Bulmer M. 1990. Analysis of the inheritance, selection and evolution of growth trajectories. Genetics 124: 979–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/124.4.979
Kumar A, Gandhi R S and Paul A K. 2009. Genetic evaluation of lifetime traits in Sahiwal cattle. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 62:374–76.
Meyer K. 2007. WOMBAT—A tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). Journal of Zhejiang University Science B 8: 815– 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0815
Prakash V, Gupta A K, Gupta A, Gandhi R S and Kumar A. 2015. Milk yield variation in first three lactations and factors affecting milk yield in Sahiwal cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 85: 1267–69.
Prakash V, Gupta A K, Gupta A, Gandhi R S, Singh A and Chakravarty A K. 2016. Random regression model with heterogeneous residual variance reduces polynomial order fitted for permanent environmental effect but does not affect genetic parameters for milk production in Sahiwal cattle. Animal Production Science http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AN15347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15347
Sawalha R M, Keown J F, Kachman S D and Van Vleck L D. 2005. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle with test-day models with autoregressive covariance structures and with a 305-d model. Journal of Dairy Science 88: 3346–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73018-6
Schaeffer L R. 2004. Application of random regression models in animal breeding. Livestock Science 86: 35–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00151-9
Singh A. 2014. ‘Genetic evaluation of Karan-Fries cattle using test-day milk yields by random regression models’. M.V.Sc. Thesis, National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India.
Spearman C. 1904. The proof and measurement of association between two things. American Journal of Psychology 15: 72– 101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1412159
Zavadilova L, Jamrozik J and Schaeffer L R. 2005. Genetic parameters for test-day model with random regressions for production traits of Czech Holstein cattle. Czech Journal of Animal Science 50: 142–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/4008-CJAS
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.