Effect of feeding hydroponics maize fodder replacing maize of concentrate mixture partially on digestibility of nutrients and milk production in lactating cows
346 / 114
Keywords:
Cows, Digestibility, Feeding, Fodder, Hydroponics, Lactating, Maize, Milk, NutrientsAbstract
An experiment was conducted to find out the effect of feeding hydroponics maize fodder by replacing maize of concentrate mixture partially on digestibility of nutrients and milk production in lactating cows. Lactating cows (6) (avg. BW 437 kg, avg. milk yield 8.57 kg) were divided into 2 equal groups i.e. Maize Grain Group (MGG) and Hydroponics Maize Fodder Group (HMFG) based on their body weight and milk yield. Two types of concentrate mixture (CMmaize 100 or CMmaize 50) were prepared. CMmaize 100 contained maize grain 35, rice polish 35, soybean meal 27, mineral mixture 2 and common salt 1 parts by weight. In CMmaize 50, 50% of the maize of CMmaize 100 was replaced partially and it contained maize grain 17.5, rice polish 54, soybean meal 25.5, mineral mixture 2 and common salt 1 parts by weight. Randomly, animals of MGG and HMFG were offered 6 kg CMmaize 100 and CMmaize 50, respectively along with 10 kg fresh conventional green fodder (napier bajra hybrid, CO-3) and ad lib. jowar straw. Besides, animals of the HMFG were offered five kg fresh HMF, sprouted from approximately one kg maize, which has been withdrawn from 6 kg concentrate mixture. The experiment was conducted for a period of 45 days. The fresh yield of the HMF from one kg maize seed was 5–6 kg with 12.39% DM content. Feeding of HMF by replacing the maize grain of the concentrate mixture had not altered the DM intake (11.20 vs 11.52 kg/day) and roughage: concentrate ratio (51:49 vs 52:48) of the animals. There was nonsignificant increase in the digestibility of nutrients, nutritive value, milk yield (7.97 vs 8.59 kg/day), 4.0% FCM (8.25 vs 9.31 kg/day), and fat (%) (4.20 vs 4.50) in HMFG than the MGG. The feed conversion ratio (FCR) in terms of DM (1.51 vs 1.40), CP (0.19 vs 0.18) and TDN (1.03 vs 0.96) was better in the HMFG than the MGG. It can be concluded that hydroponics maize fodder can be fed to the lactating cows by replacing maize of the concentrate mixture partially with improvement in the performance of the animals.Downloads
References
Anonymous. 2012. Moo-ve aside, hydroponics technology is here. Gomantak Times.
Anonymous. 2013. Hydroponics technology benefitting dairy farmers. Gomantak Times.
AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.
Finney P L. 1982. Effect of germination on cereal and legume nutrient changes and food or feed value. A comprehensive review. Recent Advances in Phytochemistry 17: 229–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1167-6_12
Naik P K and Singh N P. 2014. Production and feeding of hydroponics green fodder. Indian Farming 64(6): 42–44.
Naik P K, Dhuri R B, Karunakaran M, Swain B K and Singh N P. 2014. Effect of feeding hydroponics maize fodder on digestibility of nutrients and milk production in lactating cows. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 84(8): 880–83.
Naik P K, Dhuri R B, Swain B K and Singh N P. 2012b. Nutrient changes with the growth of hydroponics fodder maize. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 29: 161–63.
Naik P K, Dhuri R B, Swain B K, Karunakaran M, Chakurkar E B and Singh N P. 2013a. Analysis of existing dairy farming in Goa. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83(3): 299–303.
Naik P K, Gaikwad S P, Gupta M J, Dhuri R B, Dhumal G M and Singh N P. 2013b. Low cost devices for hydroponics fodder production. Indian Dairyman, October Issue, pp 68–72.
Naik P K, Karunakaran M, Chakurkar E B, Swain B K and Singh N P. 2016b. Digestibility of nutrients in crossbred heifers supplemented with hydroponically sprouted maize grains. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 86(10): 1210–12.
Naik P K, Karunakaran M, Swain B K, Chakurkar E B and Singh N P. 2016c. Voluntary intake and digestibility of nutrients in heifers fed hydroponics maize (Zea mays L.) fodder. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 33(2): 233–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-6744.2016.00041.4
Naik P K, Swain B K and Singh N P. 2015. Review-production and utilization of hydroponics fodder. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 32(1): 1–9.
Naik P K, Swain B K, Chakurkar E B and Singh N P. 2012a. Performance of dairy cows on green fodder maize based ration in coastal hot and humid climate. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 12: 265–70.
Naik P K, Swain B K, Chakurkar E B and Singh N P. 2016a. Effect of seed rate on yield and proximate constituents of different parts of hydroponics maize fodder. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 87(1): 109–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i1.66923
NRC. 1989. Nutrient Requirements for Dairy Cattle. (6th revised ed). National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC.
Pandey H N and Pathak N N. 1991. Nutritional evaluation of artificially grown barley fodder in lactating crossbred cows. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 8(1): 77–78.
Ranjhan S K. 1998. Nutrient requirement of Livestock and Poultry, 2nd revised edn., ICAR, New Delhi, India.
Reddy G V N, Reddy M R and Reddy K K. 1988. Nutrient utilization by milch cattle fed on rations containing artificially grown fodder. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 5(1): 19–22.
Shaeffer’s formula. 1998. Sastry N S R, Thomas C K and Singh R A (Eds). Livestock Production and Management. 3rd edn, p.406, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi.
Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods, 8th ed. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co, Calcutta, India.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.