Impact of feeding essential oils on feed fermentation and rumen microbial profile in crossbred cattle calves
279 / 131
Keywords:
Calves, Crossbred cattle, Essential oils, Methane, Microbes, RumenAbstract
The essential oils (EOs), viz. ajwain (Trachyspermum copticum, AjO), lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus, LO), clove (Syzygium aromaticum) oleoresin (CO) and a blend (BEO) of the 3 were screened using in vitro gas production test for their potential to mitigate methane production. Inclusion of all the 3 EOs and BEO at the rate of 1.0 μl/ml of incubation medium resulted in a depression in total gas and methane production with a maximum reduction of 91.6 and 97.2% by BEO. Feed digestibility was significantly reduced by all the 3 EOs and BEO as compared to control but was similar among the 4 treatments. The level of total volatile fatty acids, acetic and propionic acids in fermented medium was significantly decreased by inclusion of EOs and BEO. Based on the results of these results, BEO was selected for the feeding trial. Ten crossbred cattle calves (average body weight, 68±5 kg) were divided into 2 groups of 5 animals each and subjected to 2 treatments i.e. diet without (control) and with BEO @ 0.1 mL/kg BW (treated). The diet comprised concentrate mixture (21.9%, CP and 71.1% TDN) and wheat straw in 50:50 ratio. There was no impact of BEO feeding on rumen metabolites and enzyme profile. As assessed by real time PCR, the population of protozoa and Ruminococcus albus reduced, whereas, bacteria, fungi, Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens remained unaffected by BEO feeding. Methanogen population density tended to reduce by BEO feeding. The results clearly indicated that BEO exhibited antimethanogenic activity in in vitro system. By feeding BEO, the decreased population density of protozoa and methanogens in the rumen, the 2 major microbial groups involved in methanogenesis, also supported antimethnogenic property of BEO.
Downloads
References
Abbasi T, Abbasi T and Abbasi S A. 2016. Reducing the global environmental impact on livestock production, the mini livestock option. Journal of Cleaner Production 112: 1754– 66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.094
Agarwal N, Agarwal I, Kamra D N and Chaudhury L C. 2000. Diurnal variations in the activities of hydrolytic enzymes in different fractions of rumen contents of Murrah buffaloes. Journal of Applied Animal Research 18: 73–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2000.9706325
Agarwal N, Kamra D N, Chatterjee P N, Kumar R and Chaudhary L C. 2008. Changes in microbial profile, methanogenesis and fermentation of green forages with buffalo rumen liquor as influenced by 2-bromoethanesulphonic acid. Asian Australian Journal of Animal Science 21: 818–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70336
Agarwal N, Shekhar C, Kumar R, Chaudhary L C and Karma D N. 2009. Effect of peppermint (Mentha piperita) oil on in vitro methanogenesis and fermentation of feed with buffalo rumen liquor. Animal Feed Science and Technology 148: 321–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.04.004
Anantasook N, Wanapat M, Cherdthong A and Gunun P. 2013. Changes of microbial population in the rumen of dairy steers as influenced by plant containing tannins and saponins and roughage to concentrate ratio. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 26: 1583–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13182
Beauchemin K A and McGinn S M. 2006. Methane emissions from beef cattle, effects of fumaric acid, essential oil and canola oil. Journal of Animal Science 84: 1489–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.8461489x
Benchaar C, Petit H V, Berthiaume R, Whyte T D and Chouinard P Y. 2006. Effects of addition of essential oils and monensin premix on digestion, ruminal fermentation, milk production, and milk composition in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89: 4352–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72482-1
Cardozo P W, Calsamiglia S, Ferret A and Kamel C. 2004. Effects of natural plant extracts on ruminal protein degradation and fermentation profiles in continuous culture. Journal of Animal Science 82: 3230–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.82113230x
Caro D, Davis S J, Bastianoni S and Caldeira K. 2014. Global and regional trends in green house gas emissions from livestock. Climate Change 126: 203–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1197-x
Cottyn B G and Boucque C V. 1968. Rapid method for the gas chromatographic determination of volatile fatty acids in rumen fluid. Journal of Agriculture Food Chemistry 16: 105–07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60155a002
Denman S E and McSweeny C S. 2006. Development of a real- time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 58: 572–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00190.x
Denman S E, Tomkins N W and McSweeney C S. 2007. Quantitation and diversity analysis of ruminal methanogenic populations in response to the antimethanogenic compound bromochloromethane. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 62: 313– DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00394.x
Giordani R, Regli P, Kaloustian J, Mikail C, Abou L and Portugal H. 2004. Antifungal effects of various oils against Candida albicans. Potentiation of antifungal action of amphotericin B by essential oil from Thymus vulgaris. Phytotherapy Research 18: 990–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1594
Hristov A N, McAllister T A, Van Herk F H, Newbold C J and Cheng K J. 1999. Effect of Yucca schidigera on ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestion in heifer. Journal of Animal Science 77: 2554–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7792554x
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2013. Summary for Policymakers. Climate Change 2013, The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the IPCC [(Eds) Stocker T F, Qin D, Plattner G K, Tignor M, Allen S K, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V and Midgley P M]. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA.
Iversen S L and Jorgensen M H. 1995. Azocasein assay for alkaline protease in complex fermentation broth. Biotechnology Techniques 9: 573–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00152446
Joch M, Cermak L, Hakl J, Hucko B, Duskova D and Marounek M. 2016. In vitro screening of essential oil active compounds for manipulation of rumen fermentation and methane mitigation. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 29(7): 952–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0474
Kouazounde J B, Jin L, McAllister T A and Gbenou J D. 2016. In vitro screening of selected essential oils from medicinal plants acclimated to Benin for their effects on methane production from rumen microbial fermentation. African Journal of Biotechnology 15: 442–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2015.14615
Kung J L, Williams P, Schmidt R J and Hu W. 2008. A blend of essential plant oils used as an additive to alter silage fermentation or used as a feed additive for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91: 4793–4800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1402
Lowry O H, Rosenbrough N J, Farr A R and Randall R J. 1951. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biology and Chemistry 193: 265–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6
Mbiriri D T, Cho S, Mamvura C I and Choi N J. 2016. Assessment of rumen microbial adaptation to garlic oil, carvacrol and thymol using the consecutive batch culture system. Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry 4: 101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15744/2348-9790.4.101
Menke K H and Steingass H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained by chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Devlopement Journal 28: 7–55.
Miller G L. 1959. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determining reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry 31: 426– 28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
Morgavi D P, Forano E, Martin C and Newbold C J. 2010. Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Animal 4: 1024–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110000546
Patra A K and Yu Z. 2012. Effects of essential oils on methane production, fermentation, abundance and diversity of rumen microbial populations. Applied Environmental Microbiology 78: 4271–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00309-12
Patra A K and Yu Z. 2015. Effects of adaptation of in vitro rumen culture to garlic oil, nitrate, and saponin and their combinations on methanogenesis, fermentation, and abundances and diversity of microbial populations. Frontiers in Microbiology 6: 1434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01434
Pawar M M, Kamra D N, Agarwal N and Chaudhary L C. 2014. Effects of essential oils on in vitro methanogenesis and feed fermentation with buffalo rumen liquor. Agricultural Research 3: 67–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-014-0092-z
Rira M, Chentli A, Boufenera S and Bousseboua H. 2015. Effects of plants containing secondary metabolites on ruminal methanogenesis of sheep in vitro. Energy Procedia 74: 15 – 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.513
Ritalahti K M, Amos B K, Sung Y, Wu Q, Koenigsber S S and Loffler F E. 2006. Quantitative PCR targeting 16s rRNA and reductive dehalogenase genes simultaneously monitors multiple Dehalococcoides strains. Applied Environmental Microbiology 72: 2765–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.4.2765-2774.2006
Samal L, Chaudhary L C, Agarwal N and Kamra D N. 2015. Effect of plants containing secondary metabolites as feed additives on rumen fermentation and rumen microbial profile of buffaloes. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 15: 427– 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-181X.2015.00043.8
Samal L, Chaudhary L C, Agarwal N and Kamra D N. 2016. Effects of plants containing secondary metabolites as feed additives on rumen metabolites and methanogen diversity of buffaloes. Animal Production Science 56: 472–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15596
Shewale J G and Sadana J C. 1978. Cellulase and b-glucosidase by a basidomycete species. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 24: 1204–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/m78-195
SPSS. 2007. SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc, Illinois, USA.
Sylvester J T, Karnati S K R, Yu Z, Morrison M and Firkins J L. 2004. Development of an assay to quantify rumen ciliate protozoal biomass in cows using real-time PCR. Journal of Nutrition 134: 3378–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.12.3378
Thao N T, Wanapat M, Cherdthong A and Kang S. 2014. Effects of Eucalyptus crude oils supplementation on rumen fermentation, microorganism and nutrient digestibility in swamp buffaloes. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 27: 46–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13301
Tomkins N W, Stuart E D, Ruangyote P, Wanapat M, McSweeney C S and Elliott R. 2015. Manipulating rumen fermentation and methanogenesis using an essential oil and monensin in beef cattle fed a tropical grass hay. Animal Feed Science and Technology 200: 25–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.11.013
Van Soest P J and Robertson J B. 1988. A laboratory manual for animal science. Cornell University, USA, pp 612.
Wang R F, Cao W W and Cerniglia C E. 1997. PCR detection of Ruminococcus spp. in human and animal faecal samples. Molecular and Cellular Probes 11: 259–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/mcpr.1997.0111
Weatherburn M W. 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry 39: 971–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60252a045
Yatoo M A, Chaudhary L C, Agarwal N and Kamra D N. 2014. Effect of a blend of essential oils on in vitro methanogenesis and feed fermentation with buffalo rumen liquor. AnimalNutrition and Feed Technology 14: 371–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-181X.2014.01343.2
Yu Z and Morrison M. 2004. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechnology Techniques 36: 808–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2144/04365ST04
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.