Influence of biologically active substances from Kombucha (Medusomyces gisevii) on rat gut microbiota with experimental antibiotic-associated dysbiosis


288 / 80

Authors

  • BONDAREVA NADEZHDA IVANOVNA Moscow state Regional University, Moscow, Russia
  • TIMCHENKO LYUDMILA DMITRIEVNA Moscow state Regional University, Moscow, Russia
  • DOBRYNYA YULIYA MIHAJLOVNA Moscow state Regional University, Moscow, Russia
  • ALIEVA ELENA VASIL'EVNA Moscow state Regional University, Moscow, Russia
  • RZHEPAKOVSKY IGOR' VLADIMIROVICH Moscow state Regional University, Moscow, Russia
  • LIKHACHEVA ELENA SERGEEVNA Moscow state Regional University, Moscow, Russia
  • SIZONENKO MARINA NIKOLAEVNA Moscow state Regional University, Moscow, Russia
  • PISKOV SERGEYIVANOVICH Moscow state Regional University, Moscow, Russia
  • KOZLOVA MARIA Moscow state Regional University, Moscow, Russia
  • ARESHIDZE DAVID Moscow state Regional University, Moscow, Russia

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i5.70256

Keywords:

Antibiotic, Dysbiosis, Experimental antibiotic-associated dysbiosis, Gentamicin, Kombucha, Medusomyces gysevii, Microbic simbiont, Microflora, Prebiotic, Rat, Tea mushroom, Zooglea

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of biologically active substances from Medusomyces gisevii zoogloea (MG zoogloeas) on intestine microbiocenosis of white rats during the experimental antibioticassociated dysbiosis. The intestinal dysbiosis of rats was induced by gentamicin sulfate in dose of 10 mg/ rat twice a day for 10 days for all the rats. Animals in the control group received a standard diet recommended by the Institute of Nutrition, the animals of the experimental group received 120 mg of active substance of MG zoogloea/rat every day during the experiment, in addition to the usual diet. After the termination of the oral administration of gentamicin the animals of the second sub-group (experimental 2) received 120 mg of active substance of MG zoogloea every day during the experiment, in addition to the basic diet. The animals in the control group showed a dysbiosis symptoms, observed a significant decrease in the total bacterial counts, as well as the decrease of Bifidobacterium spp, Lactobacillus spp, Escherichia coli level starting from the fourth until 10th day of the experiment, the number of Candida spp. increased. Animals of the experimental group avoided the symptoms of dysbiosis, reduce of the test groups of bacteria occurred only on the eighth day, and Candida level did not rise. After discontinuation of gentamicin administration rats treated with MG showed rapid disappearance of dysbiosis symptoms, the number of microflora started to improve significantly already in the fourth day, while the control sub-group animals showed small increase occurred only on the eighth day. Results indicated that using biologically active substances from Medusomyces gisevii zoogloea has positive effects on intestine microbiocenosis of rats during the experimental antibiotic-associated dysbiosis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • ALIEVA ELENA VASIL'EVNA, Moscow state Regional University, Moscow, Russia

    North-Caucasus Fedrel University, 1 Pushkin St. Starropal, Russia. Stavropol State Medical University, 310, Mira st. Stavropol, Russia.

  • RZHEPAKOVSKY IGOR' VLADIMIROVICH, Moscow state Regional University, Moscow, Russia

    North-Caucasus Fedrel University, 1 Pushkin St. Starropal, Russia. Stavropol State Medical University, 310, Mira st. Stavropol, Russia.

References

Bamba T, Kanauchi O, Andoh A and Fujiyama Y. 2002. Effects of guar gum, ispaghula and microcrystalline cellulose on abdominal symptoms, gastric emptying, orocaecal transit time and gas production in healthy volunteers. Digestive and Liver Disease 2: 129–33.

Barry K A, Wojcicki B J, Middelbos I S, Vester B M, Swanson K S and Fahey G C. 2010. Dietary cellulose, fructooligosaccharides, and pectin modify fecal protein catabolites and microbial populations in adult cats. Journal of Animal Science 88(9): 2978–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2464

Bianchi M and Capurso L. 2002. Effects of guar gum, ispaghula and microcrystalline cellulose on abdominal symptoms, gastric emptying, orocaecal transit time and gas production in healthy volunteers. Digestive and Liver Disease 2: 129–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1590-8658(02)80180-3

Blaut M. 2002. Relationship of prebiotics and food to intestinal microflora. European Journal of Nutrition 41: 11–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-002-1102-7

Bohnhoff N, Drake B L and Muller C P. 1954. Effect of streptomycin on susceptibility of the intestinal tract to experimental salmonella infection. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 86: 132–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-86-21030

Brown K, DeCoffe D, Molcan E and Gibson D L. 2012. Diet- induced dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota and the effects on immunity and disease. Nutrients 4: 1095–1119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu4081095

Chau F, Yang P, Yu C M and Yen G C. 2008. Investigation on the lipid- and cholesterol-lowering abilities of biocellulose. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56(6): 2291–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf7035802

Chicherin I Ju, Darmov I V, Erdjakova A S, Pogorel’skij I P and Lundovskih I A. 2013. A method of modeling bowel dysbacteriosis of laboratory animals. Patent RU 2477894.

Collins F M and Carter P B. 1978. Growth of salmonellae in orally infected germ free mice. Infection and Immunity 21: 41–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.21.1.41-47.1978

Freter R. 1956. Experimental enteric Shigella and Vibrio infections in mice and guinea pigs. Journal of Experimental Medicine 104: 411–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.104.3.411

Freter R. 1955. The fatal enteric cholera infection in the guinea pig achieved by inhibition of normal enteric flora. Journal of Infectious Diseases 97: 57–64.

Freter R. 1954. The fatal enteric cholera infection in the guinea pig. Achieved by Inhibition of Normal Enteric Flora 97: 57– 65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/97.1.57

Gayathry G and Gopalaswamy G. 2014. Production and characterisation of microbial cellulosic fibre from Acetobacter xylinum. Indian Journal of Fibre and Textile Research 39: 93– 96.

Gomez E, Tuohy K M, Gibson G R, Klinder A and Costabile A. 2009. In vitro evaluation of the fermentation properties and potential prebiotic activity of Agave fructans. Journal of Applied Microbiology 108(6): 2114–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04617.x

Habriev R U. 2005. Manual on experimental (preclinical) study of new pharmacological substances.

Hawrelak J A and Myers S P. 2004. The causes of intestinal dysbiosis: a review. Alternative Medicine Review 9(2): 180– 97.

Schrezenmeir J and de Vrese M. 2001. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics—approaching a definition. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 73: 361–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/73.2.361s

Kolida S and Gibson G R. 2007. American Society for Nutrition Prebiotic Capacity of Inulin-Type Fructans. Journal of Nutrition 137(11): 2503–06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/137.11.2503S

Kotkoskie L A, Butt M T, Selinger E, Freeman C and Weiner M L. 1996. Qualitative investigation of uptake of fine particle size microcrystalline cellulose following oral administration in rats. Journal of Anatomy 189(3): 531–35.

Kozyrovska N O, Reva O M, Goginyan V B and de Vera J P. 2012. Kombucha microbiome as a probiotic: a view from the perspective of post-genomics and synthetic ecology. Biopolymers and Cell 28(2): 103–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7124/bc.000034

Muthukumarasamy R, Revathi G, Seshadri S and Lakshminarasimhan C. 2002. Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus (syn. Acetobacter diazotrophicus), a promising diazotrophic endophyte in tropics. Current Science 83(2): 137– 45.

Neera, Ramana K V and Batra H V. 2015. Occurrence of cellulose- producing Gluconacetobacter spp. in fruit samples and kombucha tea, and production of the biopolymer. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 176(4): 1162–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-015-1637-8

O’Hara A and Shanahan F. 2006. The gut flora as a forgotten organ. EMBO Reports 7(7): 688–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400731

Paturi G, Butts C, Monro J, Nones K, Martell S, Butler R and Sutherland J. 2010. Cecal and colonic responses in rats fed 5 or 30% corn oil diets containing either 7.5% broccoli dietary fiber or microcrystalline cellulose. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58(10): 6510–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf100296m

Ramana K V, Tomar A and Sing L. 2000. Effect of various carbon and nitrogen sources on cellulose synthesis by Acetobacter xylinum. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 16(3): 245–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008958014270

Ramyadevi J, Jeyasubramanian K, Marikani A, Rajakumar G and Rahuman A A. 2012. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of copper nanoparticles. Materials Letters 71: 114 –16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.12.055

Rathore P, Hegde A, Ginjupalli K and Upadhya P N. 2009. Evaluation of antifungal activity of additives to resilient liners: an in vitro pilot study. Artificial Organs 23(1): 6–9.

Ren G, Hu D, Cheng E W, Vargas-Reus M A, Reip P and Allaker R P. 2009. Characterisation of copper oxide nanoparticles for antimicrobial applications. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 33(6): 587–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.12.004

Tuohy K M, Probert H M, Smejkal C W and Gibson G R. Using probiotics and prebiotics to improve gut health. Drug Discovery Today 8(15): 692–700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02746-6

Downloads

Submitted

2017-05-09

Published

2017-05-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

IVANOVNA, B. N., DMITRIEVNA, T. L., MIHAJLOVNA, D. Y., VASIL'EVNA, A. E., IGOR' VLADIMIROVICH, R., SERGEEVNA, L. E., NIKOLAEVNA, S. M., SERGEYIVANOVICH, P., MARIA, K., & DAVID, A. (2017). Influence of biologically active substances from Kombucha (Medusomyces gisevii) on rat gut microbiota with experimental antibiotic-associated dysbiosis. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 87(5), 624–629. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i5.70256
Citation