Influence of drinking structured water on production performance, nutrient retention, carcass characteristics and economics in commercial broiler chicken


343 / 175

Authors

  • P VASANTHAKUMAR Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences,University, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu 637 002 India
  • D CHANDRASEKARAN Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences,University, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu 637 002 India
  • M R PURUSHOTHAMAN Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences,University, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu 637 002 India
  • C KATHIRVELAN Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences,University, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu 637 002 India
  • S R JANANI Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences,University, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu 637 002 India
  • S SENTHILKUMAR Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences,University, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu 637 002 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i6.71174

Keywords:

Broiler performance, Carcass quality, Production economics, Structured water

Abstract

Water from open and bore well are commonly used in majority of the poultry farms in India. When the drinking water is passed through specially designed apparatus in which tuned geometry creates an energy environment for the water to structure itself, it is claimed that surface tension of water is lowered with better hydrating properties. This geometric technology said to break up large low energy water molecule clusters into smaller high energy clusters which is called as structured water or structure-altered water. In order to study the influence of structured water on the performance of commercial broiler chicken, an experiment was conducted using 216 numbers of Vencobb broiler chicks up to 42 days of age. The birds were assigned to two groups comprising of twelve replicates per group with 9 birds per replicate. The control group (108) was offered tap water whereas the treatment group was offered structured water for drinking purpose. The body weight (g) was numerically higher in structured water group (2016 ± 28 vs 1989 ± 26) as compared to tap water offered group. Similarly, the feed conversion efficiency was relatively better (1.769 ± 0.02 vs 1.802 ± 0.02) in structured water group. The total quantity of water consumed (ml/bird) up to 6 weeks age was less in structured water group (11511±144) as compared to the tap water (11101±112) offered group. The digestibility of nutrients and retention of minerals were similar among the tap and structured water offered groups. The heart (10.12b±0.34 vs 9.16a±0.20) and spleen weights (2.73b±0.012 vs 1.817a±0.005) were significantly high and abdominal fat content was low (1.021a±0.055 vs 1.204b±0.061) in structured water group as compared to tap water offered group. The feed cost per kg body weight gain was comparatively low (Rupees 1.03) in structured water group (Rupees 54.88 ± 0.55 vs 55.91 ± 0.48). From this study, it can be inferred that structured water offered to commercial broiler chicken for drinking purpose resulted in extra profit of `2.06/bird.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC. 2012. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemist. 19th edn. Washington, D.C, USA.

Jayanthi D. 2015. Performance of Structured Water on Growth, Yield and Quality of Cotton and Vegetables. Project Completion Report, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.

Nalayini P. 2016. Beneficial effects of structured water and pink pigmented facultative methylotrophs for growth, yield and quality of irrigated cotton. Sixth World Cotton Research Conference. May 2–6, 2016, Brazil.

Pattanaik A K, Jadhav S E, Dutta N, Verma A K and Bhuyan R. 2015. Eco-Responsive Feeding and Nutrition: Linking Livestock and Livelihood. Abstract. Proceedings of 9th Biennial Animal Nutrition Association Conference. 242 pp. 22–24 January 2015. Guwahati.

Ptok Fabian. 2014. ‘Alternative Irrigation Methods: Structured Water in the Context of a Growing Global Food Crisis due to Water Shortages.’ Undergraduate Honours Thesis. 182PP.

Pollack G. 2013. The Fourth Phase of Water, Beyond Solid, Liquid and Vapour. Seattle Ebner and Sons Publishers, UK.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1989. Statistical Methods. 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, USA.

Sateash. 2015. Effect of Structured Water on Yield and Quality of Grape Variety Thompson Seedless. Project Final Report, University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot, India.

Vasanthakumar P, Chandrasekaran D, Purushothaman M R, Kathirvelan C, Janani S and Senthilkumar. 2014. Influence of Drinking Structured Water on Production Performance of Commercial Broiler Chicken. Proceedings of XXXI Annual Conference of Indian Poultry Science Association and National Symposium On Poultry Production for Global Trade. December 18–20, Namakkal, India, pp 147.

Voeikov V L and Del G. 2009. Living state. Water 1: 52 – 75.

Downloads

Submitted

2017-06-19

Published

2017-06-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

VASANTHAKUMAR, P., CHANDRASEKARAN, D., PURUSHOTHAMAN, M. R., KATHIRVELAN, C., JANANI, S. R., & SENTHILKUMAR, S. (2017). Influence of drinking structured water on production performance, nutrient retention, carcass characteristics and economics in commercial broiler chicken. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 87(6), 742–746. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i6.71174
Citation