Use of body surface area in rural buffaloes


215 / 71

Authors

  • S B GOKHALE BAIF Central Research Station Uruli Kanchan, Pune, Maharashtra 412 202 India
  • T V SHIRSATH BAIF Central Research Station Uruli Kanchan, Pune, Maharashtra 412 202 India
  • D R SONAWANE BAIF Central Research Station Uruli Kanchan, Pune, Maharashtra 412 202 India
  • D N SHINDE BAIF Central Research Station Uruli Kanchan, Pune, Maharashtra 412 202 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i6.71336

Keywords:

Body surface area, Body parameters, Buffalo, 2D image

Abstract

The study on 919 rural Murrah adult buffaloes aging between 39 to 89 months belonging to 846 farmers spread in 555 villages of 5 districts in Uttar Pradesh was conducted to estimate body surface area (BSA) using 2D photographic image by digital camera and using computer software BIOVIS PSM_L1000. Mean BSA was 2.92±0.16 sq. m. Effect of district, body condition and age of animal was not significant while animal body size and profession of buffalo keeper were found to have important effect on the BSA of animal. Mean body length, height at withers, chest girth and estimated body weight were 98.73±0.44 cm, 126.81±0.44 cm, 152.64±0.64 cm and 220.03±0.02 kg, respectively. Correlations between different body measurements studied and BSA were highly significant and ranged from 0.500±0.03 to 0.993±0.03 indicating their utility at field level for selecting traits effective in strategizing breeding programs in districts of eastern Uttar Pradesh region.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd EI-Aleem S, Desoky S, Maher Ali A, Abdel-Gwad K H and Nafady A A. 2014. Distributing the population density of ectoparasites on the animal body surface in animal production farms. Research Journal Agriculture Environmental Management 3 (6): 270–73.

Buranakarl C, Indramangala J, Koobkaew K, Sanghuayphrai N, Sanpote J, Tanprasert C, Phatrapornnant T, Sukhumavasi W and Nampimoon P. 2012. Estimation of body weight and body surface area in Swamp buffaloes using visual image analysis. Journal of Buffalo Science 1: 13–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2012.01.01.03

Napolitanoa F, De Rosab G, Grassob F, Pacellia C and Bordib A. 2004. Influence of space allowance on the welfare of weaned buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) calves. Livestock Production Science 86: 117– 24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00148-9

Hurnik J F and Lewis N J. 1991. Use of body surface area to set minimum space allowances for confined pigs and cattle. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 71: 577–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas91-068

Rath R N, Monhanty A, Pradhan C R and Sahoo G. 2005. Appearance and performance of Kalhandi buffaloes in their native tract. Indian Journal Animal Production Management 19(1–4): 72–78.

Gokhale S B, Shirsath T V, Kadam H D, Gaundare Y S and Sonawane D R. 2015. Field approach to estimation of body surface area in buffalo.International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 33(3): 2377–81.

Downloads

Submitted

2017-06-20

Published

2017-06-21

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

GOKHALE, S. B., SHIRSATH, T. V., SONAWANE, D. R., & SHINDE, D. N. (2017). Use of body surface area in rural buffaloes. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 87(6), 775–777. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i6.71336
Citation