Push and Pull factors of migration amongst livestock rearers distressed by national calamity in India: A Polytomous Universal Model analysis


349 / 144

Authors

  • SUDHANAND PRASAD LAL ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • K S KADIAN ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India
  • WORKNEH ABEBE WODAJO ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 132 001 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i7.72304

Keywords:

Calamity, Logit, Migration, Ordinal logistic, PLUM

Abstract

An endeavor was made to figure out push and pull factors of migration amongst livestock rearers distressed by national calamity in India. Reckoning ordinal response of 160 respondents; 86, 38 and 36 respondents were classified as not-adopter, partially adopter and fully adopter of migration, respectively; subsequently coding it into 0, 1 and 2 for the final Polytomous Universal Model (PLUM). Triangulation of different tests was done to justify aptness of PLUM. Predictor variables viz. age, income, livestock-holding [odds ratio (OR), 0.638; 99% CI of Estimate (E) =-.799 to -.101] and skilled work was statistically significant at 1% level but age and livestock-holding was found to be negatively significant. However, remaining 2 explanatory variables viz. expectation level and land holdings increased the probability for migration among farmers. Major push factor of migration was non-availability of
work during agricultural lean season and pull factor was expectation of higher income. This plausibly signifies that, if curbing migration from rural to urban region is a policy agenda of government, variables identified through PLUM, viz. age, income, livestock-holding and skilled work should be given due consideration. The researchers conclude that the identified predictive variables could become cornerstone for migratory research work among livestock rearers, as such an investigation is scarce in India and worldwide.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baby S. 2005. Livelihood security of rural community: A critical analysis. Published Ph.D. thesis, IARI, New Delhi. Published online at KrishiPrabha (e-Theses) - Nehru Library, CSS HAU, Hisar, India. http://14.139.232.167:8080/equestthesis/TextResult.do

Bergfjord O J, Lien G and Hoveid O. 2011. Factors influencing farmer migration in Norway: A study based on survey results linked to financial data, ActaAgriculturaeScandinavica, Section C — Food Economics 8(2): 92–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16507541.2011.607592

Cámara-Cabrales L. 1999. Small farmer migration and the agro- forestry alternative in the Panama Canal watershed. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 8(3/4): 11–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J091v08n03_02

Deb U K, Rao G D N, Rao Y M and Slater R. 2002. Diversification and Livelihood Options: A Study of Two Villages in Andhra Pradesh, India 1975–2001, Working Paper 178, Overseas Development Institute, London, United Kingdom. https://www.odi.org/resources/docs/2694.pdf.

Decarlo L T. 2003. Using the PLUM procedure of SPSS to fit unequalvariance and generalized signal detection models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 35 (1): 49–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195496

Deshingkar, P and Start D. 2003. Seasonal migration for livelihoods in India: Coping, accumulation and exclusion. Working Paper 220, Overseas Development Institute, London. http://164.100.154.90/files/migration.pdf.

Elias A, Nohmi M, Yasunobu K and Ishida A. 2015. Farmers’ satisfaction with agricultural extension service and its influencing factors: a case study in North West Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 17(1): 39– 53.

Field A. 2013. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics: Sex and Drugs and Rock ‘n’ Roll. 4th edn. pp. 952p. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, United Kingdom. https://in.sagepub.com/en-in/sas/discovering-statistics-using-ibm- spss-statistics/book238032.

Grada C O and O’ Rourke K H. 1997. Migration as disaster relief: lessons from the great Irish famine. European Review of Economic History 1(1): 3–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1361491697000026

Government of Bihar report to World Bank. 2010. Need assessment report: Bihar Kosi flood 2008. Report submitted to World Bank on June 2010. https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/gfdrr/ files/publication/GFDRR_India_PDNA_2010_EN.pdf.

IBM Corp. 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Released 2011. http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21476197

Lal S P, Kadian K S, Jha S K,Sharma A K, Goyal J, Kumar R S, Chauhan A K, Singh S R K and Singh S P. 2015. Change in livestock holdings, adaptation strategies and livelihood security of the farmers affected by national calamity in Bihar, India. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 68 (1): 83–90.

Lal S P, Kadian K S, Jha S K, Singh S R K, Goyal, Kumar R S, and Singh S P. 2014. A resilience scale to measure farmers’ suicidal tendencies in national calamity hit region of India. Current World Environment 9(3): 1001–07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.9.3.55

Lal S P, Mohammad A, Ponnusamy K and Kale R B. 2016a. A methodological pathway to quantify perception of the participants in animal fairs with relevance to national dairy mela at NDRI Karnal, India. Journal of Animal Research 6 (3): 437–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2277-940X.2016.00042.5

Lal S P, Mohammad A, Ponnusamy K and Kale R B. 2016b. Expectation of participants in national dairy fair of India: A complete itemization by multivariate analysis. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 86(8): 940–46.

Kothri C R and Garg G. 2014. Research methodology: methods and techniques. 3rd edn. pp.xx, 449p. New Age International Publishers, New Delhi. http://www.newagepublishers.com/ servlet/nagetbiblio?bno=000896.

Liu X. 2009. Ordinal regression analysis: fitting the proportional odds model using Stata, SAS and SPSS. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 8(2): 632–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035340

NSSO. 2014. Key Indicators of Situation of Agricultural Households in India, NSS 70th Round, January–December 2013; Report Number: NSS KI (70/33), National Sample Survey Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India, December. 2014. http://mail.mospi.gov.in/index.php/catalog/157/related_materials Panigrahi S K. 2014. Environmental refugees–the result of another form of forced rural migration. Kurukshetra, 62(11): 11–13.

Sabahiah N and Sukor A. 2014. Neglecting helmet usage in rural area: behavioral causal factors according to different age groups. Hassan R, Yusoff, M, Ismail Z, Amin, N Mand Fadzil M A (Eds.). CIEC 2013: Proceedings of the International Civil and Infrastructure Engineering Conference 2013, Springer Science and Business Media, Singapore, pp. 413–422. http://www.springer.com/us/book/9789814585019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-02-6_36

Tiffen M. 2004. Population pressure, migration and urbanization: Impacts on crop–livestock systems development in West Africa. Drylands Research, Somerset, United Kingdom.http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.511. 2863.

Downloads

Submitted

2017-07-20

Published

2017-07-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

LAL, S. P., KADIAN, K. S., & WODAJO, W. A. (2017). Push and Pull factors of migration amongst livestock rearers distressed by national calamity in India: A Polytomous Universal Model analysis. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 87(7), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i7.72304
Citation