Utilization of enzyme incubated rape seed meal as a source of protein in commercial broiler diets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i8.73522Keywords:
Broiler chicken, Enzyme incubation, Performance, Protein retention, Rape seed mealAbstract
Two experiments were conducted to study the possibility of utilizing enzyme incubated rape seed meal (RSM) in broiler diets (1 to 42 day of age). The RSM was anaerobically incubated with non-starch polysaccharide hydrolyzing enzymes (cellulase 1,500 IU, xylanase 250 IU and pectinase 125 IU per kilogram) for 300 minutes (processed RSM1, experiments 1 and 2) and 600 min (processed RSM2, experiment 2). Processed and raw RSM contained similar concentration of glucosinolates (275 and 288 mM/g, respectively). During the experiment 1, maize-soybean meal control diet (CD), two diets with raw (RRSM) and processed RSM (PRSM1) at 100 g/kg each were prepared. In the experiment 2, RRSM, PRSM1 and PRSM2 were included each at 3 levels (50, 100 and 150 g/kg). Each diet was offered to 9 replicates having 5 birds in each. Body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI), feed efficiency (FE), ready to cook (RTC) yield and breast weight were depressed by incorporating RRSM (experiments 1, 2). As a result of this study, PRSM1 significantly reduced FI, maintained BWG and improved FE compared to the control group. BWG was not affected by including PRSM1 and PRSM2 up to 100 and 50 g/kg, respectively but depressed at higher inclusion levels compared to the CD. The BWG in processed RSM fed groups were higher than the respective level of raw RSM fed groups. Retention of energy and protein were improved by incorporating processed RSM compared to those fed RRSM. Based on the data, it is concluded that enzyme (cellulase, xylanase and pectinase) incubated RSM for 300 minutes improved the nutritional value, which can be incorporated up to 100 g/kg in broiler diet without affecting performance and slaughter variables, which can be attributed to the improved retention of energy and protein in RSM based diets.
Downloads
References
Amerah A M, van de Belt K and van Der Klis J D. 2015. Effect of different levels of rapeseed meal and sunflower meal and enzyme combination on the performance, digesta viscosity and carcass traits of broiler chickens fed wheat-based diets. Animal 9: 1131–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000142
AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 17th Edn. Washington, DC, U.S.A.
Banday M T and Verma S V S. 2003. Influence of chemical treatment of rape seed meal diets on the performance and nutrient utilization in broiler chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 20: 76–82.
Choct M. 2006. Enzymes for the feed industry: past, present and future. World’s Poultry Science Journal 62: 5–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS200480
Damen B, Pollet A, Dornez E, Broekaert W F, Van Haesendonck I, Trogh I, Arnaut F, Delcour J A and Courtin C M. 2012. Xylanase-mediated in situ production of arabinoxylan oligosaccharides with prebiotic potential in whole mean breads and breads enriched with arabinoxylan rich materials. Food Chemistry 131: 111–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.08.043
Kocher A, Choct M, Porter M D and Broz J. 2000. The effects of enzyme addition to broiler diets containing high concentrations of canola or sunflower meal. Poultry Science 79: 1767–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.12.1767
Llames C R and Fontaine J. 1994. Determination of amino acids in feeds: Collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 77: 1362–1402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/77.6.1362
McGhee J E, Kirk L G and Mustakas G G. 1965. Total glucosinalates methods for Brassica species. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 42: 889–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02541187
McNeill L, Bernard K and Macleod M G. 2004. Food intake, growth rate, food conversion and food choice in broilers fed on diets high in rapeseed meal and pea meal with observations of the resulting poultry meat. British Poultry Science 45: 519– 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660412331286235
Meng X, Slominski B A, Nyachoti C M, Campbell L D and Guenter W. 2005. Degradation of cell wall polysaccharides by combinations of carbohydrase enzymes and their effect on nutrient utilization and broiler chicken performance. Poultry Science 84: 37–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.1.37
Newkirk R W, Classen H L and Tyler R T. 1997. Nutritional evaluation of low glucosinolate mustard meal (B. juncea) in broiler diets. Poultry Science 76: 1272–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.9.1272
Newkirk R W and Classen H L. 2002. The effects of toasting canola meal on body weight, feed conversion efficiency and mortality in broiler chicken. Poultry Science 81: 815–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.6.815
O’Neill H V M, Smith J A and Bedford M R. 2014. Multicarbohydrase enzymes for non-ruminants. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 27: 290–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13261
Prakash B, Rama Rao S V, Raju M V L N, Kondal Reddy K, Panda A K and Mallikarjuna Reddy P V. 2016. Effect of supplementing encapsulated microbial enzymes to corn- soybean meal based pelleted diets on performance and carcass variables in coloured broiler chicken. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 86: 840–42.
Rama Rao S V, Prakash B, Raju M V L N, Panda A K and Murthy O K. 2014. Effect of supplementing non-starch polysaccharide hydrolyzing enzymes in guar meal based diets on performance, carcass variables and bone mineralization in Vanaraja chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 188: 85–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.021
Rama Rao S V, Raju M V L N, Panda A K, Poonum N S, Shyam Sunder G and Sharma R P. 2008. Utilization of sesame (Sesamum indicum) seed meal in broiler chicken diets. British Poultry Science 49: 81–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660701827888
Rama Rao S V, Raju M V L N, Panda A K and Sailaja Shashibindu M. 2005. Utilization of low glucosinalate and conventional mustard oilseed cakes in commercial broiler chicken diets. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 18: 1157–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.1157
Rama Rao S V, Raju M V L N, Prakash B, Pradeep Kyumar Reddy E and Panda A K. 2015. Effect of dietary inclusion of toasted guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) meal as a source of protein on performance of White Leghorn layers. British Poultry Science 56: 733–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2015.1113498
Tripathi M K and Mishra A S. 2007. Glucosinolates in animal nutrition: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology 132: 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.03.003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.
How to Cite
