Cryoprotective effect of low-density lipoproteins on post thaw semen quality in Hariana bull
201 / 116 / 63
Keywords:
CASA, Cryopreservation, Hariana bull, Low-density lipoproteins, Sperm characteristicsAbstract
The study aimed to evaluate the cryoprotective effect of low-density lipoprotein in Hariana bull semen. Four adult Hariana bull (3-4 years) after thorough andrological examination were selected for experiment. Semen was collected from each bull twice a week; total of 32 ejaculates (8 from each bull) were collected during the experiment. Collected sample from each bull was divided into 5 equal aliquots. Four aliquots were diluted separately with a Tris-based extender containing different concentration of low-density lipoproteins viz. 7% (T-1), 8% (T-2), 9% (T-3) and 10% (T- 4) as treatment while routinely used extender containing 20% hen egg yolk was used as control (C) to achieve final concentration of 125 million spermatozoa/ml. The diluted samples were cryopreserved and evaluated after 7 days. A significantly higher value of percent live sperms, sperm positive for hypo osmotic swelling test, sperms with intact acrosome and sperms exhibiting pattern F (uncapacitated sperm) were significantly higher in T-3 as compared to other treatment groups and control. The kinematic characters exhibited by sperm i.e forward progression %, VCL (μm/sec), VSL (μm/sec), VAP (μm/sec), Lin (%), Str (%), BCF (Hz) and ALH (μm) were significantly higher in T-3 as compared to other treatment group and control. In conclusion, extender containing 9% low density lipoproteins has better capacity to maintain the sperm character in post thaw Hariana bull semen and can be a preferred concentration to be utilized for cryopreservation with improved conception rate.
Downloads
References
Abouelezz F M, Castano C, Toledano-Diaz A, Esteso M C, Lopez- Sebastian A, Campo J L and Santiago- Moreno J. 2015. Sperm- egg penetration assay assessment of the contraceptive effects of glycerol and egg yolk in rooster sperm diluents. Theriogenology 83: 1541–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.02.002
Akhter S, Ansari M S, Rakha B A, Ullah N, Andrabi S M H and Khalid M. 2011. In vitro evaluation of liquid-stored buffalo semen at 5ºC diluted in soya lecithin based extender (Bioxcell), tris-citric egg yolk, skim milk and egg yolk-citrate extenders. Reproduction in Domestic Animal 46: 45–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01561.x
Amirat L, Anton M, Tainturier D, Chatagnon G, Battut I and Courtens J. 2005. Modifications of bull spermatozoa induced by three extenders: Biociphos, low density lipoprotein and Triladyl, before, during and after freezing and thawing. Reproduction 129: 535–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00011
Anand M, Yadav, Vaswani S and Shukla P K. 2015. Low density lipoprotein (LDL) as cryoprotectant in semen extender: A new approach. Asian Journal of Animal Science 10: 211–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15740/HAS/TAJAS/10.2/211-219
Baracaldo M I, Barth A D and Bertrand W. 2007. Steps for freezing bovine semen: From semen collection to the liquid nitrogen tank. IVIS Reviews in Veterinary Medicine. International Veterinary Information Service, Ithaca, NY.
Bellin M E, Oyarzo J N, Hawkins H E, Zhang H, Smith R G, Forrest D W, Sprott L R and Ax R L. 1998. Fertility-associated
antigen on bull sperm indicates fertility potential. Journal of Animal Science 76: 2032–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.7682032x
Bucak M N, Atessahin A and Yuce A. 2008. Effect of antioxidant and oxidative stress parameters on ram semen after the freeze- thawing process. Small Ruminant Research 75: 128–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.09.002
Chaudhari D V, Dhami A J, Hadiya K K and Patel J A. 2015. Relative efficacy of egg yolk and soya milk-based extenders for cryopreservation (–196°C) of buffalo semen. Veterinary World 8: 239–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.239-244
Collin S, Sirard M, Dufour M and Bailey J. 2000. Sperm calcium levels and chlortetracycline fluorescence patterns are related to the in vivo fertility of cryopreserved bovine semen. Journal of Andrology 21: 938–43.
Crespilho A M, Sa´ Filho M F, Dell’Aqua Jr. J A, Nichi M, Monteiro G A, Avanzi B R, Martins A and Papa F O. 2012. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo fertilizing potential of bovine semen frozen in egg yolk or new lecithin based extenders. Livestock Science 149: 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.05.011
Gadella B M and Luna C. 2014. Cell biology and functional dynamics of the mammalian sperm surface. Theriogenology 81: 74–84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.005
García Vázquez F A, Gadea J, Carmen Matas C and Holt W V. 2016. Importance of sperm morphology during sperm transport and fertilization in mammals. Asian Journal of Andrology 18: 844–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.186880
Garner D L, Thomas C A and Allen C H. 1997. Effect of semen dilution on bovine sperm viability as determined by dual-DNA staining and flow cytometry. Journal of Andrology 18: 324– 31.
Hancock J L. 1952. The morphology of bull spermatozoa. Journal of Experimental Biology 29: 445–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.29.3.445
Ikawa M, Inoue N, Benham A M and Okabe M. 2010. Fertilization: a sperm’s journey to and interaction with the oocyte. Journal of Clinical Investigation 120: 984–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI41585
Jeyendran R S, Van H H, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo B G and Zanevald L J D. 1984. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 70: 219–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0700219
Leahy T and Gadella B. 2016. Capacitation and capacitation- like sperm surface changes induced by handling boar semen. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 46: 7–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01799.x
Morris G J and Clark A. 1987. Cell at low temperatures. (Eds) Grout B W W and Morris G J. The Effects of Low Temperatures on Biological Systems. pp. 72–119. Edward Arnold, London.
Moussa M, Martinet V, Trimeche A, Tainturier D and Anton M. 2002. Low density lipoproteins extracted from hen egg yolk by an easy method: cryoprotective effect on frozen thawed bull semen. Theriogenology 57: 1695–706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)00682-9
Naresh S and Atreja S K. 2015. The protein tyrosine phosphorylation during in vitro capacitation and cryopreservation of mammalian spermatozoa. Cryobiology 70: 211–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2015.03.008
Neves M M, Heneine L G D and Henry M. 2014. Cryoprotection effectiveness of low concentrations of natural and lyophilized LDL (low density lipoproteins) on canine spermatozoa. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 66: 769–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-41626184
Parks J E and Graham J K. 1992. Effects of cryopreservation procedures on sperm membranes. Theriogenology 38: 210– 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(92)90231-F
Pereira R, Sa R, Barros A and Sousa M. 2017. Major regulatory mechanisms involved in sperm motility. Asian Journal of Andrology 19: 5–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.167716
Ray Kalyani R, Gojen S L and Bidhan S. 2015. Cryopreservation of Black Bengal buck semen by Tris-based extenders containing different levels of egg-yolk. Annals of Veterinary and Animal Science 2: 47–54.
Rittem S, Thongthainun D, Tipkantha W, Siriaroonrat B and Thongtip N. 2012. Effects of semen extender on motility and movement patterns of frozen-thawed eld’s deer (Cervus eldii) spermatozoa. Thai Journal of Veterinary Medicine 42: 527–32.
Vera Munoz O, Amirat-Briand L, Diaz T, Vasquez L, Schmidt E, Desherces S, Anton M, Bencharif D and Tainturier D. 2009.
Effect of semen dilution to low-sperm number per dose on motility and functionality of cryopreserved bovine spermatozoa using low-density lipoproteins (LDL) extender: comparison to Triladyl® and Bioxcell®. Theriogenology 71: 895–900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.10.010
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.