Developmental competence of goat oocytes vitrified at immature and mature stage in comparsion to fresh oocytes after in vitro fertilization using cauda epididymal spermatozoa


296 / 162 / 120

Authors

  • DIMPLE KUMARI Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 482 004 India
  • DHARMENDRA KUMAR Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 482 004 India
  • SANDEEP RAHANGDALE Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 482 004 India
  • LALIT MOHAN JEENA Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 482 004 India
  • AJIT PRATAP SINGH Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 482 004 India
  • BIKASH CHANDRA SARKHEL Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh 482 004 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i11.75878

Keywords:

Embryos, In vitro fertilization, Metaphase spindle, Oocytes, Vitrification

Abstract

The oocytes were cryopreserved at 2 developmental check points, viz. immature and metaphase II stage, and the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) was assessed as compared to fresh oocytes. The oocytes were cryopreserved by solid surface vitrification technique using equilibration media (4% ethylene glycol) followed by vitrification media (0.5 M sucrose + 35% ethylene glycol + 0.5% polyvinyl pyrollidone). The mature oocytes were pre-treated
with cytochalasin B for 30 min before vitrification. The vitrified-thawed oocytes of both groups as well fresh oocytes were fertilized with buck epididymal sperm. The results revealed a significantly higher rate of embryonic development in vitrified-thawed immature oocytes as compared to that in vitrified-thawed mature oocytes at all the embryonic stages. The embryonic developmental rate under fresh oocyte group was significantly higher than both vitrified groups. Results indicated that the immature goat oocytes could be a better candidate for long term storage of female germplasm as well as dissemination into distant places.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Baka S G, Veek L L, Jones H W and Lanzendorf S J. 1995. Evaluation of spindle apparatus of in vitro matured human oocytes following cryopreservation. Human Reproduction 10: 1816–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136182

2. Dattena M, Ptak G, Loi P and Cappai P. 2000. Survival and viability of vitrified in vitro and in vivo produced ovine blastocysts. Theriogenology 53(8): 1511–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00293-4

3. Fujihira T, Kishida R and Fukui Y. 2004. Developmental capacity of vitrified immature porcine oocytes following ICSI: effects of cytochalasin B and cryoprotectants. Cryobiology 49: 286– 90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2004.08.004

4. Garg N and Purohit G N. 2007. Effect of different cryoprotectant concentrations for ultrarapid freezing of immature goat follicular oocytes on their subsequent maturation and fertilization in vitro. Animal Reproduction Science 4:113–18.

5. Kumar D, Gopalakrishna R, Singh A P, Ranjan R, Pandey S K and Sarkhel B C. 2014. Developmental potency of pre-implant parthenogenetic goat embryos: effect of activation protocols and culture media. In vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Animal 50(1):1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-013-9680-7

6. Kumar D, Jain S K and Sarkhel B C. 2016. A comparison of in vitro fertilization potential of sperm obtained from refrigerated (4°C) epididymis and fresh ejaculation of buck under different embryo culture media. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 86(8): 883–86.

7. Ledda S, Leoni G, Bogliolo L and Naitana S. 2001. Oocytes cryopreservation and ovarian tissue banking. Theriogenology 55: 1359–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00487-3

8. Mandelbaum I, Anastasious O, Levy R, Guerin I F, de Larouziere V and Antonine J M. 2004. Effect of cryopreservation on meiotic spindle of human oocytes. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Biology 113: 17– 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.11.005

9. Massip A and Donnay I. 2003. Cryopreservation of bovine oocytes: current status and recent developments. Reproduction Nutrition Development 43(4): 325–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:2003024

10. Moawad A R, Fisher P, Zhu J, Choi I, Polgar Z, Dinnyes A and Campbell K H S. 2012. In vitro fertilization of ovine oocytes vitrified by solid surface vitrification at germinal vesicle stage. Cryobiology 65(2): 139–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.04.008

11. Nema S, Jain S K, Gehlaut B S and Sarkhel B C. 2007. Vitrification of immature goat oocytes by solid surface vitrification technique. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 77(7): 556–58.

12. Parrish J J. 2014. Bovine in vitro fertilization: In vitro oocyte maturation and sperm capacitation with heparin. Theriogenology 81: 67–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.08.005

13. Purohit G N, Meena H and Solanki K. 2012. Effects of vitrification on immature and in vitro matured, denuded and cumulus compact goat oocytes and their subsequent fertilization. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility 13(15): 53–59.

14. Rho G J, Kim S, Yoo J G, Balasubramanian S, Lee H J and Choe S Y. 2002. Microtubulin configuration and mitochondrial distribution after ultra-rapid cooling of bovine oocytes. Molecular Reproduction and Development 4: 464–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10196

15. Sathananthan A H, Ng S C, Trounson A D, Bongso A, Ratnam S S, Ho J, Mok H and Lee M N. 1988. The effects of ultrarapid freezing on meiotic and mitotic spindles of mouse oocytes and embryos. Gamete Research 21: 385–01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1120210407

16. Sharma T G, Kharche S D and Majumdar A C. 2006. Vitrification of in vitro matured goat oocytes and the effect on in vitro fertilization. Small Ruminant Research 64(1–2): 82–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.04.001

17. Shirazi A, Taheri F, Nazari H, Norbakhsh-Nia M, Ahmadi E and Heidari B. 2012. Developmental competence of ovine oocyte following vitrification: effect of oocyte developmental stage, cumulus cells, cytoskeleton stabiliser, FBS concentration, and equilibration time. Zygote 14(1): 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S096719941200038X

18. Silvestre M A, Yániz J, Salvadora I, Santolaria P and López-Gatius F. 2006. Vitrification of pre-pubertal ovine cumulus oocyte complexes: effect of cytochalasin B pre-treatment. Animal Reproduction Science 93(1–2): 176–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.08.006

19. Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. 6th edn. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi.

20. Somfai T, Noguchi J, Kaneko H, Nakai M, Ozawa M, Kashiwazaki N, Egerszegi I, Ratky J, Nagai T and Kikuchi K. 2010. Production of good-quality porcine blastocysts by in vitro fertilization of follicular oocytes vitrified at the genninal vesicle stage. Theriogenology 73: 147–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.08.008

21. Somfai T, Ozawa M, Noguchi J, Kaneko H, Kuriani K N W, Farhudin M, Dinnyés A, Nagai T and Kikuchi K. 2007. Developmental competence of in vitro fertilized porcine oocytes after in vitro maturation and solid surface vitrification: Effect of cryopreservation on oocyte antioxidative system and cell cycle stage. Cryobiology 55: 115–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2007.06.008

22. Vajta G. 2000. Vitrification of the oocytes and embryos of domestic animals. Animal Reproduction Science 60: 357–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00097-X

23. Vincent C, Pickering S J and Johnson M H. 1990. The hardening

24. effect of dimethylsulphoxide on the mouse zona pellucida requires the presence of an oocyte and is associated with a reduction in the number of cortical granules present. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility 89: 253–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0890253

25. Zhang J, Nedambaleb T L, Yangc M and Lia J. 2009. Improved development of ovine matured oocyte following solid surface vitrification (SSV): effect of cumulus cells and cytoskeleton stabilizer. Animal Reproduction Science 110 (1–2): 46–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.12.023

Published

2017-11-17

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KUMARI, D., KUMAR, D., RAHANGDALE, S., JEENA, L. M., SINGH, A. P., & SARKHEL, B. C. (2017). Developmental competence of goat oocytes vitrified at immature and mature stage in comparsion to fresh oocytes after in vitro fertilization using cauda epididymal spermatozoa. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 87(11), 1345–1349. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i11.75878
Citation