Evaluation of a three-way crossbred chicken developed for rural poultry under farm and backyard conditions for growth and production traits

U RAJKUMAR; S HAUNSHI; C PASWAN; B L N REDDY; S P YADAV

doi:10.56093/ijans.v88i2.79348

Authors

U RAJKUMAR Principal Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
S HAUNSHI Principal Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
C PASWAN Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
B L N REDDY Principal Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
S P YADAV Senior Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v88i2.79348

Keywords:

Backyard poultry, Crossbred, Egg production, Growth

Abstract

The growth and production performance of a promising three way cross was evaluated under farm and backyard conditions to assess its suitability as backyard chicken variety. The data generated on 200 birds from backyard and 136 birds from farm conditions was analyzed to study the effect of sex on growth and rearing system on growth and production traits. Sex had significant influence on body weights from 6 to 16 weeks of age. Sexual dimorphism was clearly observed in three-way cross with significantly higher body weights in cocks than hens under both farm and backyard conditions. The body weight of male and female birds at 16 weeks of age was 1704.12±16.89 and 1308.22±15.11 g, under farm conditions, while it was 1504.44±32.33 and 962.45±28.22 g, respectively in backyard conditions. Sex had significant effect on the shank length at all ages with longer shanks in males. The laying period body weights were significantly higher in farm reared birds. The type of rearing system significantly influenced age at sexual maturity (ASM), egg weight and egg production till 52 weeks of age. The egg production at 40 and 52 weeks of age was significantly lower in scavenging birds grown in backyard conditions. The ASM was 144.55±1.38 and 198.32±12.23 days in farm and backyard conditions, respectively. The egg production at 52 weeks of age was 146.33±4.41 and 118.40±8.11 eggs in farm and backyard conditions, respectively. The annual egg production (72 weeks of age) was 227.81±6.75 eggs in farm. The study concluded that the better performance of this three-way cross under farm and backyard system with respect to growth and egg production makes it a promising egg type variety for rural poultry farming in the country.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelqader A, Wollny C B and Gaudy M. 2007. Characterization of local chicken production systems and their potential under different levels of management practices in Jordon. Tropical Animal Health and Production 39: 155–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007-9000-x

Ajayi F O and Ejiofor O. 2009. Effect of genotype × sex interaction on growth and some development characteristics of Ross and Anak broiler strains in the high rain forest zone of Nigeria. Asian Journal of Poultry Science 3: 31–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2009.51.56

Aklilu H A, Almekinders C J M and Van der Zijpp A J. 2007. Village poultry consumption and marketing in relation to gender, religious festivals and market access. Tropical Animal Health and Production 39: 165–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007-9002-8

Ayyagari V. 2008. Development of varieties for rural poultry. Souvenir Seminar on Sustainable Poultry Production: Rural and Commercial Approach. 3 March 2008. Hyderabad, India, pp. 1–5.

Bell D D. 2002. Cage management for layers. Commercial Chicken Meat and Egg Production. (Eds) Bell D D and Weaver W D. 5th edn, pp 1007–1040. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0811-3_52

Haunshi S, Doley S and Shakutala I. 2009. Production performance of indigenous chicken of northeastern region and improved varieties developed for backyard farming. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 79: 901–05.

Khan A G. 2008. Indigenous breeds, crossbreds and synthetic hybrids with modified genetic and economic profiles for rural family and small scale poultry farming in India. World’s Poultry Science Journal 64: 405–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933908000135

Niranjan M, Sharma R P, Rajkumar U, Reddy B L N, Chatterjee R N and Bhattacharya T K. 2008. Comparative evaluation of production performance in improved chicken varieties for backyard farming. International Journal of Poultry Science 7: 1126–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.1128.1131

Padhi M K, Rajkumar U, Haunshi S, Niranjan M, Panda A K, Bhattacharya T K, Reddy M R, Bhanja S K and Reddy B L N. 2012. Comparative evaluation of male line of Vanaraja, control broiler, Vanaraja commercial in respect to juvenile and carcass quality traits. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 47: 136–39.

Padhi M K, Chatterjee R N and Rajkumar U. 2014. A study on performance of a crossbred chicken developed using both exotic and indigenous breeds under backyard system of rearing. Journal of Poultry Science and Technology 2: 26–29.

Padhi M K, Chatterjee R N, Rajkumar U, Niranjan M and Haunshi S. 2016. Evaluation of a three-way cross chicken developed for backyard poultry in respect to growth, production and carcass quality traits under intensive system of rearing. Journal of Applied Animal Research 44: 390–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2015.1091336

Pica-ciamarra U and Otte J. 2010. Poultry food security and poverty in India: looking beyond the farm-gate. World’s Poultry Science Journal 66: 309–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933910000358

Rajkumar U, Rama Rao S V and Sharma R P. 2010. Backyard poultry farming; Changing the face of rural India. Indian Farming 59: 20–23.

Rajkumar U and Rama Rao S V. 2015. Gramapriya, a prolific brown egg layer for rural backyards. Indian Farming 65: 32– 34.

Rajkumar U, Sharma R P, Haunshi S, Padhi M K, Rajaravindra K S, Reddy B L N, Niranjan M, Bhattacharya T K, Haunshi S and Chatterjee R N. 2011. Genetic analysis of juvenile growth and carcass traits in a full diallele mating in selected coloured broiler lines. Tropical Animal Health and Production 43: 1129– 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9812-6

Rajkumar U, Haunshi S, Paswan C, Raju M V L N, Rama Rao S V and Chatterjee R N. 2017. Characterization of indigenous Aseel chicken breed for morphological, growth, production and meat composition traits from India. Poultry Science 96: 2120–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew492

Sambo E, Betridge J, Dessie T, Amare A, Habte T, Wigley P and Chridtley R M. 2015. Participatory evaluation of chicken health and production constraints in Ethiopia. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 118: 117–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.10.014

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. 8th edn. The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.