Impact of livestock production on poverty - evidence from rural Tamil Nadu*
263 / 79
Keywords:
Fixed effect regression, Impact, Livestock, Poverty, Poverty ratiosAbstract
The present study was undertaken in rural Tamil Nadu to quantify the impact of livestock production on poverty using randomly selected 540 sample respondents. The data were collected through personal interview using pretested interview schedules from sample respondents undergoing various occupations in the six districts covering four agro-climatic zones of Tamil Nadu. The per capita income function of households was fitted to explore the impact of livestock production on poverty. The results implied that the value of assets, education, employment in mandays, livestock occupation had a significant positive impact on the per capita income in contrast to the variables, viz. family size, family dependency ratio and illiteracy, which had negative impact. The per capita income with and without the particular occupation was estimated using the concerned co-efficients. Further, the poverty ratios were worked out in presence of an occupation and in absence of an occupation. The poverty indices were found to be higher for the income with occupation, when compared to the income without occupation for all the chosen occupations, except agricultural labourers. It could be concluded that the presence of agricultural labourer occupation increased the head count ratio (P0) by 0.0370, poverty gap index (P1) by 0.0208, poverty severity index (P2) by 0.0125 and the Watts index (W) by 0.0317. Among all the occupations, the presence of livestock farming decreased the poverty indices by the greatest extent (0.1852 of P0, 0.1002 of P1, 0.0593 of P2, and 0.1562 of W).). Following livestock, fishing had the greater potential of poverty reduction with the reduction values of 0.1852 (P0), 0.0844 (P1), 0.0492 (P2) and 0.1306 (W). Further, it could be revealed that the presence of livestock occupation, decreased the exit time for poverty by 5.22 years and it was 4.35 years for fishing occupation, 3.60 years for non-farm occupation and 2.05 years for cropping activity. Based on the results of the study, it could be concluded that the any poverty alleviation programme should comprise a livestock component.
Downloads
References
Ali J. 2007. Livestock sector development and implications for rural poverty alleviation in India. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 19, Article 27. Retrieved May 2, 2013, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd19/2/ali19027.htm.
Cuong N V. 2010. Does agriculture help poverty and inequality reduction? Evidence from Vietnam. Agricultural Economics Review 11(1): 44–56.
Grace D, Lindahl J, Wanyoike F, Bett B, Randolph T and Rich K M. 2017. Poor livestock keepers: ecosystem –poverty – health interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 372: 20160166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0166
Inoni O E, Chukwuji C O, Ogisi O D and Oyaide W J. 2007. Alleviating rural poverty: What role for small-holder livestock production in Delta State, Nigeria. Agricultura Tropicaet Subtropica 40(2): 39–43.
Millar J and Photakoun V. 2008. Livestock development and poverty alleviation: revolution or evolution for upland livelihoods in Lao PDR? International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 6(1): 89–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2007.0335
Planning Commission. 2014. Report of the expert group to review the methodology for measurement of poverty under the chairmanship of Dr. C. Rangarajan. Government of India, June 2014.
World Bank. 2006. Summary of Key Finding and Recommendation for Pakistan: Poverty, 2004–05. Islamabad.
World Bank Poverty Manual. 2005. Introduction to poverty analysis. World Bank Institute.
World Bank Report. 2016. The Uganda Poverty Assessment Report 2016. Farms, cities and good fortune: assessing poverty reduction in Uganda from 2006 to 2013. World Bank, Washington DC.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.