Seroprevalence of Classical Swine Fever in pigs of Karnataka and comparative diagnostic evaluation of antigen ELISA and reverse transcriptase -PCR
Abstract views: 177 / PDF downloads: 82
https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v87i12.79743
Keywords:
Antigen, Antibody, Classical swine fever, ELISA, Karnataka, RT-PCR, SeroprevalenceAbstract
Classical swine fever is highly contagious viral disease of swine causing huge economic losses to pig farmersand pig industry. The study was conducted in Karnataka to understand the current scenario of CSF in the state and
to evaluate efficiency of diagnostic tests (antigen ELISA and RT-PCR) in detecting the disease. Serum samples
were collected from 270 pigs from 13 districts of the state and were tested for the presence of CSF antibodies.
Whole blood samples (151) from 14 outbreaks of CSF were collected for the comparative diagnosis of the disease
using Antigen ELISA and reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR. A seroprevalence of 28.5% (77/270) was found in the
serum samples collected form the whole Karnataka. The southern Karnataka had higher seroprevalence (47%) in
comparison to northern Karnataka region where seroprevalence was 17%. It confirms endemicity of the disease in
southern region. Of 151 blood samples collected for comparative diagnosis, 61 samples were positive for CSF by
RT-PCR and 39 by antigen ELISA, indicating the superiority of RT-PCR over antigen ELISA to detect CSFV
infection in earliest stages of infection.
Downloads
References
Barman N N, Gupta R S, Singh N K, Tiwari A K, Singh R K and Das S K. 2009. Comparative evaluation of molecular and antibody based technique for detection of classical swine fever virus infecting pigs of NE Region India. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 79: 974–77.
Cariolet R, Bougeard S, Rault J C, Jan B, Keranflech A, Le Diguerher G, Pol F, Kuntz-Simon G and Le Potier M F. 2008. Importance des observations cliniquesetnecrosco piques dans la detection precoce dun cas de peste porcine classique. Journees de la Recherche Porcine 40: 45–48.
Chander V, Nandi S, Ravishankar C, Upmanyu V and Verma R. 2014. Classical swine fever in pigs: recent developments and future perspectives. Animal Health Research Reviews 5: 87– 101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252314000024
Chen N, Hu H, Zhang Z, Shuai J, Jiang L and Fang W. 2008. Genetic diversity of the envelope glycoprotein E2 of classical swine fever virus: recent isolates branched away from historical and vaccine strains. Veterinary Microbiology 127: 286–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.09.009
Choori P, Patil S S, Rathnamma D, Sharada R, Chandranaik B M, Isloor S, Manjunath G B Reddy, Geetha S and Rahman
H. 2015. Prevalence of classical swine fever in Karnataka, India. Veterinary World 8: 541–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.541-544
Depner K R, Muller A, Gruber A, Rodriguez A, Bickhardt K and Liess B. 1995. Classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa) experimental infections and viral persistence. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr102: 381–84.
Dewulf J, Koenen F, Mintiens K, Denis D, Ribbens S and Kruif A. 2004. Analytical performance of several classical swine fever laboratory diagnostic techniques on live animals for detection of infection. Journal of Virological Methods119: 137–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2004.03.010
Donahue B C, Petrowski H M, Melkonian K, Ward G B, Mayr G A and Metwally S. 2012. Analysis of clinical samples for early detection of classical swine fever during infection with low, moderate, and highly virulent strains in relation to the onset of clinical signs. Journal of Virological Methods 179: 108– 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.10.008
Jasna P, Dosen R, Pusic I, Bugarski D and Valcic M. 2007. Passive immunity evaluation in piglets originating from sows vaccinated with china strain of classical swine fever virus. Acta Veterinaria 57: 413–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/AVB0706413P
Le Dimna M, Vrancken R, Koenen F, Bougeard S, Mesplede A, Hutet E, Kuntz-Simon G and Le Potier M F. 2008. Validation of two commercial real-time RT-PCR kits for rapid and specific diagnosis of classical swine fever virus. Journal of Virological Methods 147:136–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2007.08.013
Lin T, Li X, Yao H, Wei Z, Liu R, Deng Y, Zha S, Li W, Sun L, Long J, Zhang H, Lu J and Yuan S. 2013. Phylogenetic diversity of classical swine fever virus (CSFV) field isolates from outbreaks in China between 2008 and 2011. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 8: 449–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2013.449.460
Meyers G and Thiel H J. 1996. Molecular characterization of pestiviruses. Advances in Virus Research 47: 58–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60734-4
Nandi S, Muthuchelvan D, Ahuja A, Bisht S, Chander V, Pandey A B and Singh R K. 2011. Prevalence of classical swine fever virus in India: A 6-Year study (2004–2010). Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 58: 461–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1865-1682.2011.01218.x
OIE. 2017a. World Organization of Animal Health. WAHIS interface. http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Diseaseinformation/statusdetail.
OIE. 2017b. Classical swine fever. Multiannual Animal Disease Status (India). Available at: http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Diseaseinformation/statusdetail.
Patil S S, Hedadri D, Shankar B P, Raghavendra A G, Veeresh H, Sindhoora B, Chandan S, Sreekala K, Gajendragad M R and Prabhudas K. 2010. Genetic typing of recent classical swine fever isolates from India. Veterinary Microbiology 141: 367- 73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.09.021
Patil S S, Hedadri D, Veeresh H, Sreekala K, Gajendragad M R and Prabhudas K. 2012. Phylogenetic analysis of NS5B gene of classical swine fever virus isolates indicated plausible Chinese origin of Indian subgroup 2.2 viruses. Virus Genes 44: 104–08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-011-0572-1
PD_ADMAS. 2013. Annual Report 2012–13. (Ed.) Patil S S. Epidemiology of Classical Swine Fever in India, Bengaluru, India, pp 23–25.
Podgorska K, Kamieniecka K, Stadejek T and Pejsak Z. 2012. Comparison of PCR methods for detection of classical swine fever virus and other pestiviruses. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences 15: 615–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10181-012-0097-0
Raut S D, Rajak K K, Kumar R, Gurav A R, Manu M, Dhanesh V V, Muthuchelvan D, Dhar P and Pandey A B. 2015. Detection of classical swine fever virus antigen and nucleic acid on blood of experimentally infected piglets. Veterinary Science 3: 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2015/3.5s.1.6
Shivaraj D B, Patil S S, Rathnamma D, Veeregowda B M, Hemadri D, Geetha S, Reddy G B M, Sharada R, Shesharao and Rahman S. 2013. Seroepidemiology of classical swine fever in Karnataka. Indian Journal of Field Veterinarians 9: 26–27.
Shivaraj D B, Patil S S, Rathnamma D, Hemadri D, Isloor K, Geetha S, Manjunathareddy G B, Gajendragad M R and Rahman H. 2015. Genetic clustering of recent classical swine fever virus isolates from Karnataka, India revealed the emergence of subtype 2.2 replacing subtype 1.1.Virus Disease 26: 170–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-015-0273-9
Singh B, Bardhan D, Verma R M, Prasad S, Sinha D K and Sharma V B. 2016. Incidence of classical Swine fever (CSF) in pigs in India and its economic valuation with a simple mathematical model. Animal Science Reporter10: 3–9.
Summerfield A, Hofmann M A and Mccullough K C. 1998. Low density blood granulocytic cells induced during classical swine fever are targets for virus infection. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 63: 289–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2427(98)00108-1
Terpstra C. 1996. Classical swine fever. Manuals of Standards of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines. OIE. 9–22.
Wengler G, Bradley D W, Colett M S, Heinz F X, Schlesinger R W and Strauss J H. 1995. Flaviviridae. Archives of Virology 10: 415–27.
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.