Mathematical model to predict the dry matter intake of dairy cows on pasture


561 / 164

Authors

  • ROSARIO SÁNCHEZ-PÉREZ Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, State of Mexico, Mexico
  • MARÍA D MARIEZCURRENA Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Autonomous University of the State of Mexico
  • MONA M M Y ELGHANDOUR Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, State of Mexico, Mexico
  • MIGUEL MELLADO Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, State of Mexico, Mexico
  • LUIS M CAMACHO-DIAZ Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, State of Mexico, Mexico
  • MOISÉS CIPRIANO-SALAZAR Academic Unit of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, Autonomous University of Guerrero, Altamirano City, Guerrero, Mexico
  • ABDELFATTAH Z M SALEM Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, State of Mexico, Mexico

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v88i5.80007

Keywords:

Dairy cows, Dry matter intake, Grazing, Mathematical model

Abstract

In pasture-based dairy systems, there is a close relationship between milk production and dry matter intake (DMI), hence the importance of measuring these variables, although obtaining this information implies high labour and costs. The objective of this study was to design a mathematical model to predict DMI for grazing dairy cows. This model was based on the basic principle of the fill-unit system. In this scheme, cows and feedstuffs were described in terms of feed intake capacity (FIC) and fill (unit/amount of feed), respectively. The FIC was determined by the animal's ability to regulate feed intake which depends on factors such as body size, age and lactation status. The "fill" was determined by the nutritional properties of the feedstuff such as its dry matter (DM) digestibility and crude protein (CP) content, among others. In the design of the model, ad lib. feed consumption was assumed. Parity, state of lactation and gestation were considered to estimate the cow ingestion capacity. Satiety values (SV) were determined for Festuca arundinacea and Lolium multiflorum and these values were incorporated into the model, including DM, CP, neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and in vitro digestible organic matter (dOM). The fixed parameters of the model were determined by adjusting a polynomial regression to the data from three experiments with lactating Holstein cows from Baja California, Mexico (n=30).The model allows predicting DMI, using as inputs, easily measured data and does not require knowing daily milk yield (MY) or body weight (BW), so the model is practical and consistent. The results obtained from the model were satisfactory because they were similar to those attained experimentally. Average DMI was 21.68 kg/d in one group and 23.44 kg/d in the other; when applying the model, we obtained an estimate of 22.82 kg/d for a cow with characteristics similar to those of the cows under study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allison C D. 1985. Factors affecting forage intake by range ruminants -a review. Journal Range Management 38: 305–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3899409

Baudracco J, Lopez-Villalobos N, Holmes C W and Macdonald K A. 2010a. Prediction of herbage dry matter intake for dairy cows grazing ryegrass-based pastures. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 70: 80–85.

Berry D P, Coffey M P, Pryce J E, De Haas Y, Løvendahl P, Krattenmacher N, Crowley J J, Wang Z, Spurlock D, Weigel K, Macdonald K and Veerkamp R F. 2014. International genetic evaluations for feed intake in dairy cattle through the collation of data from multiple sources. Journal of Dairy Science 97: 3894–3905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7548

Boudon A, Peyraud J L, Faverdin P, Delagarde R, Delaby L and Chave A V. 2009. Effect of rumen fill on intake of fresh perennial ryegrass in young and mature dairy cows grazing or zero-grazing fresh perennial ryegrass. Animal 3: 1706–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109990486

Doole G J and Romera A J. 2013. Detailed description of grazing systems using nonlinear optimisation methods: A model of a pasture-based New Zealand dairy farm. Agricultural Systems 122: 33–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.08.001

Doreau M, Robelin J and Lestrade A. 1985. Effects of physiological-state and body fatness on digestive-tract weight and composition in the dairy cow. Livestock Production Science 12: 379–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(85)90136-8

Gregorini P, Minnee E M K, Griffiths W and Lee J M. 2013. Dairy cows increase ingestive mastication and reduce ruminative chewing when grazing chicory and plantain. Journal of Dairy Science 96: 7798–7805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6953

Huhtanen P, Rinne M, Mäntysaari P and Nousiainen J. 2011. Integration of the effects of animal and dietary factors on total dry matter intake of dairy cows fed silage-based diets. Animal 5: 691–702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731110002363

Ingvartsen K L. 1994. Models of voluntary food intake in cattle. Livestock Production Science 39: 19–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(94)90149-X

Jarrige R, Demarquilly C, Dulphy J P, Hoden A, Robelin J, Beranger C, Geay Y, Journet M, Malterre C, Micol D and Petit M. 1986. The INRA “Fill Unit” system for predicting the voluntary intake of forage-based diets in ruminants: a review. Journal of Animal Science 63: 1737–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1986.6361737x

Jensen L M, Nielsen N I, Nadeau E, Markussen B and Nørgaard P. 2015. Evaluation of five models predicting feed intake by dairy cows fed total mixed rations. Livestock Science 176: 91– 103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.03.026

Krizsan S J, Sairanen A, Höjer A and Huhtanen P. 2014. Evaluation of different feed intake models for dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 97: 2387–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7561

Mármol J F. 2006. Management of pastures and fodder in dual purpose cattle. Memories X Pastures and Forages Seminar. Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Zulia, pp 20– 22.

Mertens D R. 1994. Regulation of forage intake. Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization (forage quality). (Ed.) George C. Fahey. Pp 450–493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/1994.foragequality.c11

Miguel M F, Ribeiro Filho H M N, Crestani S, Ramos F D R and Genro T C M. 2012. Pasture characteristics of Italian ryegrass and milk production under different management strategies. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 47: 863–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2012000600018

NRC. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.

Van Rensburg M J. 2013. Nutritive value of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) established on rehabilitated mineland for grazing cattle. Thesis Doctoral, University of Pretoria, South Africa.

Volden H, Nielsen N I, Åkerlind M, Larsen M, Havrevoll Ø and Rygh A J. 2011. Prediction of voluntary feed intake. NorFor- The Nordic feed evaluation system (pp. 113–126). Wageningen Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-718-9_10

Zom R L G, André G and Van Vuuren A M. 2012. Development of a model for the prediction of feed intake by dairy cows: 1. Prediction of feed intake. Livestock Science 143: 43–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.08.014

Downloads

Submitted

2018-05-23

Published

2023-01-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

SÁNCHEZ-PÉREZ, R., MARIEZCURRENA, M. D., ELGHANDOUR, M. M. M. Y., MELLADO, M., CAMACHO-DIAZ, L. M., CIPRIANO-SALAZAR, M., & SALEM, A. Z. M. (2023). Mathematical model to predict the dry matter intake of dairy cows on pasture. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 88(5), 598-601. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v88i5.80007
Citation