Comparative efficacy of three different methods for prediction of live body weight in small ruminants


648 / 154

Authors

  • M M VAIDYA Assistant Professor, Instructional Livestock Farm Complex, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur, Maharashtra 400 053 India
  • S S KULKARNI Professor and Head, Department of Veterinary Physiology, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur, Maharashtra 400 053 India
  • V B DONGRE Subject Matter specialist (AGB), Instructional Livestock Farm Complex, Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur, Maharashtra 400 053 India
  • L S KOKATE Assistant Director (Veterinary Extension Education), Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur, Maharashtra 400 053 India
  • V N KHANDAIT Subject Matter specialist (Veterinary Extension Education), Maharashtra Animal and Fishery Sciences University, Nagpur, Maharashtra 400 053 India
  • S B KALE Incharge (Sheep and Goat Unit), College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Udgir

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v88i5.80008

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Correlation, Deccani, Osmanabadi

Abstract

The present investigation was carried out on 216 records of Osmanabadi goat and 208 records of Deccani sheep. The relative efficiency of three different methods, viz. Shaffer's formula method, multiple linear regression and artificial neural network for prediction of live body weight were investigated. Individual animals were weighed on electronic weighing balance along with their body measurements like lengths, height and girths were measured. The explanatory variables were body lengths, body height and chest girths while dependant variable was body weight. A multilayer feed forward neural network with back propagation of error learning mechanism was developed using artificial neural network using bayesian regularization algorithms. It was observed that artificial neural network was best fitted with in goat and sheep, with the adjusted R2 of 0.93, explained by its linear relationship with the explanatory variables in goat. However, the prediction accuracy (R2 value) was observed as 94.21% with 2.35 kg error. While in sheep, the adjusted R2 was 0.82 and the prediction accuracy (R2 value) was observed as 85.29% with 3.48 kg error. The multiple linear regressions observed the adjusted R2 of 0.894, and the prediction accuracy (R2 value) as 90.03% with 4.73 kg error. The correlation coefficients for different body measurements using three different methods were ranged from 0.952 to almost one.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Balasubramanyam D, Babu M, Sakthivel M S and Sivaselvam S N. 2013. Application of Artificial Neural Network to predict body weight in Madras Red sheep: Artificial Neural Network in prediction of body weight. Annual International Conference on Advances in Veterinary Science Research No.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5176/2382-5685_VETSCI13.10

Eyduran E, Zaborski D, Waheed A, Celik S, Karadas K and Grzesiak W. 2017. Comparison of the predictive capabilities of several data mining algorithms and multiple linear regression in the prediction of body weight by means of body measurements in the indigenous Beetal goat of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 49(1): 257–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/2017.49.1.257.265

MATLAB 2001. Software Version 6.1.0.

Moaeen-ud-Din M, Ahmad N, Iqbal A and Abdullah M. 2006. Evaluation of different formulas for weight estimation in Beetal, Teddi and Crossbred (Beetal × Teddi) goats. Journal of Animal and Plant Science 16(3–4): 74–78.

Pearson R A and Ouassat M. 1996. Estimation of the live weight and body condition of working donkeys in Morocco. Veterinary Record 138: 229–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.138.10.229

Ruhil A P, Raja T V and Gandhi R S. 2013. Preliminary study on prediction of body weight from morphological measurements of goats through ANN Model. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics 67: 51–58.

Downloads

Submitted

2018-05-23

Published

2023-01-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

VAIDYA, M. M., KULKARNI, S. S., DONGRE, V. B., KOKATE, L. S., KHANDAIT, V. N., & KALE, S. B. (2023). Comparative efficacy of three different methods for prediction of live body weight in small ruminants. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 88(5), 602-605. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v88i5.80008
Citation