Effect of swine-origin probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici FT28 on maintenance of antioxidant status, blood haematology and biochemical profile in early weaned grower-finisher pigs
345 / 81
Keywords:
Antioxidant, Biochemical, Haematology, Pediococcus acidilactici, Pigs, Probiotic, Weaning stressAbstract
An experiment was conducted with early weaned crossbred piglets (36) to evaluate antioxidant status and blood biochemical profile in grower-finisher pigs. The piglets were distributed into three groups (4 replicates of 3 each) and supplemented with basal diet either without probiotics (T0) or with a probiotic of dairy based (Lactobacillus acidophilus NCDC-15; T1) or swine based (Pediococcus acidilactici FT28; T2). Blood was collected at 45, 90 days (grower phase) and 136, 180 days (finisher phase) of feeding and analysed for various antioxidants and metabolites. Results of the study revealed that supplementation of probiotics improved superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase and reduced glutathione (GSH) activity in early weaned grower-finisher pigs. Whereas, GSH activity was better in P. acidilactici FT28 fed group compared to L. acidophilus fed group. Serum glucose level was reduced in both T1 and T2 groups compared to control, which was further reduced in T2 group compared to T1. The total protein, albumin and globulin level in serum remained higher in T2 group in comparison to other dietary groups. Serum triglyceride and LDL-cholesterol was lower in P. acidilactici FT28 fed group. The HDL-cholesterol level was better by probiotic supplementation in grower-finisher pigs. It was concluded that supplementation of hostorigin probiotic was effective to reduce stress besides having potential to improve blood biochemical profile.
Downloads
References
Agarwal N, Kamra D N, Chaudhary L C, Agarwal I, Sahoo A and Pathak N N. 2002. Microbial status and enzyme profile of crossbred calves fed on different microbial feed additives. Letters in Applied Microbiology 34: 329–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765X.2002.01092.x
Bergmeyer H U.1983. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. Vol. III. Weinhein, Deer Field Beach, Florida. pp 273.
Basoglu A, Sevinc M and Birdane F M. 2002. Efficacy of sodiumborate in the prevention of fatty liver in dairy cows. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 16: 732–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2002.tb02416.x
Cai C J, Cai P P, Hou CL, Zeng X F and Qiao S Y. 2014. Administration of Lactobacillus fermentum I5007 to young piglets improved their health and growth. Journal of Animal Feed Science 23: 222–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/65684/2014
Capcarova M, Weis J, Hrncar C, Kolesarova A and Pal G. 2010. Effect of Lactobacillus fermentum and Enterococcus faeciums trains on internal milieu, antioxidant status and body weight of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 94: e215–e224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01010.x
Castex M, Lemaire P, Wabete N and Chim L. 2010. Effect of probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici on antioxidant defences and oxidative stress of Litopenaeus stylirostris under Vibrio nigripulchritudo challenge. Fish Shellfish Immunology 28: 622–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2009.12.024
Chiang M L, Chen H C, Chen K N, Lin Y C, Lin Y T and Chen M J. 2015. Optimizing production of two potential probiotic Lactobacilli strains isolated from piglet feces as feed additives for weaned piglets. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 28(8): 1163–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0780
Chen Y J, Son K S, Min B J, Cho J H, Kwon O S and Kim I H. 2005. Effects of dietary probiotic on growth performance, nutrients digestibility, blood characteristics and fecal noxious gas content in growing pigs. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 18(10): 1464–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.1464
Choubey M, Pattanaik A K, Baliyan S, Dutta N, Jadhav S E and Sharma K. 2015. Dietary supplementation of a novel phytogenic feed additive: effects on nutrient metabolism, antioxidant status and immune response of goats. Animal Production Science 56(10): 1612–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14770
Dong X, Zhang N, Zhou M, Tu Y, Deng K and Diao Q. 2013. Effects of dietary probiotics on growth performance, faecal microbiota and serum profiles in weaned piglets. Animal Production Science 54(5): 616–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12372
Dowarah R, Verma A K, Agarwal N and Singh P. 2016. Effect of swine based probiotic on growth performance, nutrient utilization and immune status of early weaned grower-finisher crossbred pigs. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology 16(3): 451–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-181X.2016.00042.1
Dowarah R, Verma A K, Agarwal N, Singh P and Patel B H M. 2017. Effect of swine based probiotic on performance, diarrhoea scores, intestinal microbiota and gut health of grower-finisher crossbred pigs. Livestock Science 195: 74– 79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.11.006
Duncan D B. 1995. Multiple range and multiple F-test. Biometrics 2: 1–42.
Du Toit M, Franz P A M C, Dicks T M L, Schillinger U, Haberer P, Warlies B, Ahrens F and Holzapfel H W. 1998.
Characterisation and selection of probiotic lactobacilli for a preliminary minipig feeding trial and their effect on serum cholesterol levels, faeces pH and faeces moisture content. International Journal of Food Microbiology 40: 93–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00024-5
Friendship R M and Henry H C. 1992. Cardiovascular system, hematology, and clinical chemistry. Diseases of Swine. (Eds) Leman A D, Straw B E, Mengeling W L, D’Allaire S and Taylor D J. Iowa State University Press, Ames, LA. pp 3–10
Gilliland S E, Nelson C R and Maxwell C. 1985. Assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus. Applied Environmental Microbiology 49: 377–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.49.2.377-381.1985
Hedayati M, Manafi M, Khalaji S, Yari M, Esapour A, Nazari E and Mohebi F. 2015. Combination effect of probiotic and organic acids on blood biochemistry and immunity parameters of broilers. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research 3(4): 1288–93.
Hossein A A, Alireza M E, Mohammad R and Majid M. 2014. Effects of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis-based probiotic on performance, hematological parameters and blood metabolites in lambs. International Journal of Food and Nutritional Sciences 3(4): 8–15.
Jahreis G, Vogelsang H, Kiessling G, Schubert R, Bunte C and Hammes W P. 2002. Influence of probiotic sausage (Lactobacillus paracasei) on blood lipids and immunological parameters of healthy volunteers. Food Research International 35: 133–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(01)00174-0
JinL Z, Ho Y W, Abdullah N and Jalaludin S. 1998. Growth performance, intestinal microbial populations and serum cholesterol of broilers fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures. Poult Science 77: 1259–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.9.1259
Khan R U, Naz S, Nikousefat Z, Tufarelli V and Laudadio V. 2011. Thymus vulgaris: alternative to antibiotics in poultry feed. World Poultry Science Journal 68: 401–08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933912000517
Kumar S, Verma A K, Mondal S K, Gupta M, Patil A K and Jangi B L. 2012. Effect of live Saccharomyces cerevisiae feeding on serum biochemistry in early weaned cross bred piglets. Veterinary World 5(11): 663–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2012.663-666
Kumar S, Pattanaik A K, Sharma S and Jadhav S E. 2016. Speciesspecific probiotic Lactobacillus johnsonii CPN23 supplementation modulates blood biochemical profile and erythrocytic antioxidant indices in Labrador dogs. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 86(8): 918–24.
Lee J H, Valeriano V D, Shin Y R, Chae J P, Kim G B, Ham J S, Chun J and Kang D K. 2012. Genome sequence of Lactobacillus mucosae LM1, isolated from piglet feces. Journal of Bacteriology 194: 47–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01011-12
Onifade A A and Tewe O O. 1993. Alternative tropical energy feed resources in rabbit diets: Growth performance, diet’s digestibility and blood composition. World Rabbit Science 1(1): 17–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.1993.191
Onifade A A. 1997. Growth performance, carcass characteristics, organ measurements and haematology of broiler chickens fed a high fibre diet supplemented with antibiotics or dried yeast. Die Nahrung 41: 370–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/food.19970410612
Petrof E O, Kojima K, Ropeleski M J, Musch M W, Tao Y, De Simone C and Chang E B. 2004. Probiotics inhibit nuclear factor kappa-B and induce heat shock proteins in colonic epithelial cells through proteasome inhibition. Gastroenterology 127: 1474–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.001
Prins H K and Loos J A. 1969. Biochemical methods in red cell genetics. Academic Press, London, pp 127–129.
Prieto M L, Laurie O S, Shiau P T, McLoughlin P, O’Donovan O, Rea M C, Kent R M, Cassidy J P, Hughes H, Gardiner G E and Lawlor P G. 2014. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a marine-derived bacillus strain for use as an in-feed probiotic for newly weaned pigs. PLoS ONE 9(2): e88599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088599
Marklund S and Marklund G. 1974. Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. European Journal of Biochemistry 47: 469–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03714.x
Menami M andYoshikawa H. 1979. A simplified assay method of superoxide dismutase activity for clinical use. Clinica Chimica Acta 92(3): 337–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(79)90211-0
NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Smith A L, Stalder K J, Serenius T V, Baas T I and Mabry J W. 2008. Effect of weaning age on nursery pig and sow reproductive performance. Journal of Swine Health and Production 16: 131–37.
Taranto M P, Medici M, Perdigon G, Ruiz Holgado A P and Valdez G F. 1998. Evidence for hypocholesterolemic effect of Lactobacillus reuteri in hyper cholesterolemic mice. Journal of Dairy Science 84: 2336–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)70123-7
Wang A N, Yi X W, Yu H F, Dong B and Qiao S Y. 2009. Free radical scavenging activity of Lactobacillus fermentum in vitro and its antioxidative effect on growing–finishing pigs. Journal of Applied Microbiology 107: 1140–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04294.x
Wang J, Ji H F, Wang S X, Zhang D Y, Liu H, Shan D C and Wang Y M. 2012. Lactobacillus plantarum ZLP001: In vitro assessment of antioxidant capacity and effect on growth performance and antioxidant status in weaning piglets. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 25(8): 1153–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12079
Yadav H, Jain S and Sinha P R. 2008. Oral administration of dahi containing probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei delayed the progression of streptozotocininduced diabetes in rats. Journal of Dairy Research 75(2): 189–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029908003129
Downloads
Submitted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyright of the articles published in The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences is vested with the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, which reserves the right to enter into any agreement with any organization in India or abroad, for reprography, photocopying, storage and dissemination of information. The Council has no objection to using the material, provided the information is not being utilized for commercial purposes and wherever the information is being used, proper credit is given to ICAR.