Evaluation of immunochromatographic assay as a field test for the diagnosis of caprine brucellosis


354 / 61

Authors

  • B J TRANGADIA Assistant Professor, Department of Veterinary Pathology, Vanbandhu College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry
  • M C PRASAD Ex-Joint Director (Research), Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Uttar Pradesh

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v88i8.82908

Keywords:

Brucellosis, Goats, Immunochromatographic assay, Indirect ELISA, RBPT

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to assess the suitability of immunochromatographic assay (ICA) as a field test for the diagnosis of caprine brucellosis. Whole blood samples (570: 195 male goats, 375 female goats) were collected from selected organized herds and panjarapoles located in Southern Gujarat. Out of 570 animals tested, 19 (3.33%), 72 (12.63%) and 45 (7.89%) were positive by Rose Bengal plate test (RBPT), indirect ELISA (iELISA) and immunochromatographic assay (ICA) respectively. The sensitivity of RBPT and ICA vs iELISA was 26.39% and 61.11% respectively. Both the tests were 100% specific when compared with iELISA. Negative likelihood ratio for RBPT and ICA as compared to iELISA was 0.74 and 0.39 respectively. The negative predictive value for RBPT was 90.38% and 94.68% for ICA. However, the positive predictive values (PPV) for both the tests were 100%. McNemar chi-square test for independent data (with Yates’ correction) revealed significant difference in the positive proportion between RBPT vs iELISA as 9.30% and ICA vs iELISA as 4.91%. The concordance of iELISA with RBPT was moderate (k=0.385) while it was good (k=0.733) for ICA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed W A, Majeed S A, Abdul Ameer A H, Mahmmod N D, Saeed N I and Hanna L Y. 2016. Sensitivity and specificity of various serological tests for detection of Brucella spp. infection in male goats and sheep. Advances in Microbiology 6: 98– 103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/aim.2016.62010

El-Eragi A M, Salih M H, Alawad M F E M and Mohammed K B. 2014. Evaluation of immunochromatographic assay for serodiagnosis of bovine brucellosis in Gezira State, Sudan. Veterinary World 7: 395–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2014.395-397

Elshemey T M and Abd-Elrahman A H. 2014. Evaluation of a rapid immuno-chromatographic test for detection of Brucella abortus antibodies in Egyptian cattle sera and milk. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences 40: 24–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/ajvs.47307

Hota S R, Sahoo N and Satpathy S. 2016. Comparison of RBPT, STAT and rapid lateral flow immunochromatographic assay against indirect ELISA for diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Proceedings of International Brucellosis Research Conference, New Delhi, India. pp.134

Kavya B A, Veeregowda B M, Shome R, Gowda L, Suresh K P and Gajendragad M R. 2016. A pilot study evaluation of lateral flow assay – a point of care diagnostic for brucellosis. Proceedings of International Brucellosis Research Conference, New Delhi, India. pp.135

Kavya B A, Veeregowda B M, Isloor S, Gowda L, Kamran C, Gomes A R, Triveni K, Padmashree B S and Shome R. 2017. Comparative evaluation of blood based lateral flow assay for diagnosis of brucellosis in livestock species. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 87(9): 1068–70.

Khalek M M A, Ramadan K M, Hazem S S and Khairy E A. 2012. Evaluation of immunochromatographic assay for serodiagnosis of Brucella among cattle, sheep and goats in Egypt. Global Veterinaria 8: 511–18.

Kotadiya A J, Kumar P, Patel K M, Patel M V, Shroff S I, Dadawala A I, Srimali M D, Bhagat A, Chandel B S and Shah N M. 2015. Seroprevalence of ovine brucellosis in North Gujarat and Kutchh regions of Gujarat by i-ELISA and its comparison with RBPT and STAT. Indian Veterinary Journal 92: 42–46.

Kushwaha N, Rajora V S, Mohan A and Gupta T K. 2015. Comparative efficacy of diagnostics used for detection of Brucella antibodies in cattle. Indian Veterinary Journal 92: 18–20.

Kushwaha N, Rajora V S, Mohan A, Upadhyay A K and Kumar R. 2016. Comparison of serological tests for detection of Brucella antibodies in cattle of an organized dairy farm. Indian Journal of Animal Research 50(1): 69–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.8565

Lopez-Merino A. 1991. Brucelosis. Progress and Perspectives. Technical Publication of INDRE-SSA No. 6. Secretariat of Health, Mexico City. pp. 54.

Rahman A K, Saegerman C, Berkvens D, Fretin D, Gani M O, Ershaduzzaman M, Ahmed M U and Emmanuel A. 2013. Bayesian estimation of true prevalence, sensitivity and specificity of indirect ELISA, Rose Bengal test and slow agglutination test for the diagnosis of brucellosis in sheep and goats in Bangladesh. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 110: 242– 52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.11.029

Ray W C. 1979. Brucellosis (due to Brucella abortus and B. suis). Hand Book Series in Zoonosis. (Ed) Stell J H. Vol.1, CRC Press Inc., Florida. pp. 99–185.

Shome R, Filia G, Padmashree B S, Krithiga N, Sahay S, Triveni K, Shome B R, Mahajan V, Singh A and Rahman H. 2015. Evaluation of lateral flow assay as a field test for investigation of brucellosis outbreak in an organized buffalo farm: A pilot study. Veterinary World 8: 492–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.492-496

Smits H L, Basahi M A, Diaz R, Marrodan T, Douglas J T, Rocha A, Veerman J, Zheludkov M M, Witte O W M, De Jong J, Gussenhoven G C, Goris M G A and Vanderhoorn M A W G. 1999. Development and evaluation of rapid dipstick assay for the serodiagnosis of the early phase of brucellosis in humans. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 37: 4179–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.37.12.4179-4182.1999

Zammit T. 1905. A preliminary note on the examination of the blood of goats suffering from Mediterranean fever. Reports of the Commission on Mediterranean Fever, Part-III, Harrison and Sons, London, pp. 83.

Downloads

Submitted

2018-09-04

Published

2018-09-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

TRANGADIA, B. J., & PRASAD, M. C. (2018). Evaluation of immunochromatographic assay as a field test for the diagnosis of caprine brucellosis. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 88(8), 877-880. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v88i8.82908
Citation