Comparison of conception rate following GnRH and hCG based synchronization protocols in functionally infertile cows


160 / 83

Authors

  • AMIT KASHYAP MVSc Scholar, Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062 India
  • MADHUMEET SINGH Professor and Head, Department of Veterinary Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062 India
  • AKSHAY SHARMA PhD Scholar, Department of Veterinary Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Himachal Pradesh Agricultural University, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh 176 062 India
  • PRAVESH KUMAR Assistant Professor, Department of Veterinary Gynaecology and Obstetrics, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v88i11.85032

Keywords:

Conception rate, Functionally infertile cows, GnRH, hCG, Synchronization protocols

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agarwal S K, Singh S K and Rajkumar R. 2005. Reproductive disorders and their management in cattle and buffalo. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 75(7): 858–73.

Akbarabadi M A, Shabankareh H K, Abdolmohammadi A and Shahsavari M H. 2014. Effect of PGF2and GnRH on the reproductive performance of postpartum dairy cows subjected to synchronization of ovulation and timed artificial insemination during the warm or cold periods of the year. Theriogenology 82: 509–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.05.005

Bhattacharyya H K and Hafiz A. 2009. Treatment of delayed ovulation in dairy cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Research 43(3): 209–10.

Biradar S, Tandle M K, Haribabu Y, Usturge S M, Patil N A and Suranagi M D. 2014. Study on efficacy of Co-synch and Ovsynch protocol on fertility in repeat breeder buffaloes. Indian Journal of Advances in Plant Research 5: 1–3.

Buhecha K V, Dhami A J, Patel M D, Hadiya K K, Shah R G and Kharadi V B. 2016. Study on different estrus induction protocols with respect to fertility and plasma progesterone profile in anoestrus buffaloes. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 69: 197–201.

Buttrey. 2008. ‘Human chorionic gonadotropin and gonadotropinreleasing hormone influence pregnancy survival and resynchronized ovulation before timed artificial insemination in Holstein cattle.’ M.Sc. Thesis, Kansa State University Manhattan, Kansa.

De Rensis, Allegri M and Seidel G E J. 1999. Estrus synchronization and fertility in post-partum dairy cattle after administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and PGF2analog. Theriogenology 52: 259–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00127-2

DiZerega G J and Hodgen G D. 1981. Luteal phase dysfunction infertility: A sequel to aberrant folliculogenesis. Fertililty and Sterility 35: 489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(16)45488-9

Geary T W, Whittier J C, Hallford D M and Macneil M D. 2001. Calf removal improves conception rates to the Ovsynch and Co-synch protocols. Journal of Animal Science 79: 1–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7911

Jayaganthan P, Vijayarajan A, Prabaharan V, Rajkumar R, Sivakumar A and Raja S. 2016. Effect of Ovsynch plus CIDR protocol in management of repeat breeding crossbred Jersey cows. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology 5: 3707–12.

Keskin A, Mecitoglu G Y, Gumen A, Karakaya E, Darici R and Okut H. 2010. Effect of hCG vs. GnRH at the beginning of the Ovsynch on first ovulation and conception rates in cyclic lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 74: 602–07. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.03.009

Kuru M, Oral H, Colak A, Gürbulak K and Bekyurek T. 2017. The effect of hCG or GnRH administration on pregnancy rates in holstein heifers when used to induce ovulation as part of a 5-day Co-synch + progesterone-releasing intravaginal device protocol. Revue de Medecine Veterinaire 168(1–3): 38–45.

Mesut C, Murat S and Soner D. 2010. Comparison of pregnancy rates after timed artificial insemination in Ovsynch, heatsynch and CIDR-based synchronization protocol in dairy cows. Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi 16(1): 85–89.

Pancarci S M, Lehimcioglu N C, Ari U C, Gungor O and Akbulut O. 2013. Efficacy of hCG and GnRH with respect to follicular size and presence of the corpus luteum in Co-synch protocol integrated with norgestomet in lactating cows. Bulletin of the Veterinary Institute in Pullawy 57: 61–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bvip-2013-0011

Parmar S C. 2015. Anovulation, delayed ovulation and luteal insufficiency. Trends in Biosciences 8: 1203–06.

Prajapati K A, Sharma P K and Choudhry M K. 2015. Management of repeat breeding under field condition using Ovsynch protocol in crossbred cows. Journal of Krishi Vigyan 4(1): 60–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-4433.2015.00061.6

Pursley J R, Silcox R W and Wiltbank M C. 1998. Effect of time of artificial insemination on pregnancy rates, calving rates, pregnancy loss and gender ratio after synchronization of ovulation in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 2139–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75790-X

Savalia K K, Dhami A J, Hadiya K K and Patel K R. 2014. Augmenting fertility of anoestrus and repeat breeding buffaloes using controlled breeding techniques under field conditions. Indian Veterinary Journal 89(8): 23–27.

Schmitt E J P, Diaz T, Drost M and Thatcher W W. 1996. Use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or human chorionic gonadotropin for timed insemination in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 74: 1084–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.7451084x

Shamsuddin M, Bhuiyan M M U, Chanda P K, Alam M G S and Galloway D. 2006. Radioimmunoassay of milk progesterone as a tool for fertility control in small holder dairy farms. Tropical Animal Health and Production 38: 85–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-006-4249-z

Downloads

Submitted

2018-11-20

Published

2018-11-22

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

KASHYAP, A., SINGH, M., SHARMA, A., & KUMAR, P. (2018). Comparison of conception rate following GnRH and hCG based synchronization protocols in functionally infertile cows. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 88(11), 1266-1268. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v88i11.85032
Citation