Milking machine induced teat reactions in crossbred cows milked in automated herringbone milking parlour

A FAHIM; M L KAMBOJ; A S SIROHI; M BHAKAT; S PRASAD; R GUPTA

doi:10.56093/ijans.v88i12.85809

Authors

A FAHIM Assistant Professor, Department of Livestock Production Management, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, India
M L KAMBOJ Principal Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cattle, Meerut Cantt, Uttar Pradesh, India
A S SIROHI Senior Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cattle, Meerut Cantt, Uttar Pradesh, India
M BHAKAT Senior Scientist, ICAR, New Delhi
S PRASAD Assistant Director General, ICAR, New Delhi
R GUPTA Assistant Professor, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Jalandhar, Punjab

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v88i12.85809

Keywords:

Crossbred cows, Machine milking, Teat reactions, Udder symmetry

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berglund I, Pettersson G and Svennersten-Sjaunja K. 2002. Automatic milking: Effects on somatic cell count and teatend quality. Livestock Production Science 78: 115–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00090-8

Besier J, Lind O and Bruckmaier R M. 2016. Dynamics of teatend vacuum during machine milking: types, causes and impacts on teat condition and udder health – a literature review. Journal of Applied Animal Research 44(1): 263–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2015.1031780

Fahim A, Kamboj M L, Prasad S, Sirohi A S, Bhakat M, Mohanty T K and Malhotra R. 2017. Effect of parity, stage of lactation and udder type on milkability of crossbred dairy cows milked in automated Herringbone milking parlour. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 87(6): 761–67.

Hillerton J E, Pankey J W and Pankey P. 1999. Effects of machine milking on teat condition. Proceedings of 38th Annual Meeting of National Mastitis Council. pp. 202–03. 14–17 February. Arlington, VA, USA.

Jago J G, Burke J L and Williamson J H. 2010. Effect of automatic cluster removal settings on production, udder health, and milking duration. Journal of Dairy Science 93(6): 2541–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2949

Mein G A, Neijenhuis F and Morgan W F. 2001. Evaluation of bovine teat condition in commercial dairy herds: 1. Noninfectious factors. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality. NMC. pp. 347–51. 13–15 September. Vancouver, British Coloumbia, Canada.

Mir A Q, Bansal B K and Gupta D K. 2015. Short term changes in teats following machine milking with respect to quarter health status in cows. Journal of Animal Research 5(3): 467– 71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2277-940X.2015.00080.7

Neijenhuis F, Barkema H W, Hogeveen H and Noordhuizen J P T M. 2000. Classification and longitudinal examination of callused teat ends in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 83: 2795–04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75177-0

Ohnstad I, Mein G A, Baines J R, Rasmussen M D, Farnsworth R, Pocknee B R, Hemling T C and Hillerton J E. 2007. Addressing teat condition problems. Proceeding of 46th Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council. pp. 188–99. 21–24 January. San Antonio, Texas, USA.

Sandrucci A, Bava L, Zucali M and Tamburini A. 2014. Management factors and cow traits influencing milk somatic cell counts and teat hyperkeratosis during different seasons. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 43(9): 505–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982014000900008

Stojnovic M and Alagic D. 2012. Animal Science Days. Proceedings of 20th International Symposium. pp. 19–21. Kranjskagora, Slovenia.