Standardization of pulsation ratios in crossbred cows milked in automated herringbone milking parlour


82 / 77

Authors

  • A FAHIM Assistant Professor, Department of Livestock Production and Management, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh
  • M L KAMBOJ Principal Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cattle, Meerut Cantt, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • A S SIROHI Senior Scientist, ICAR-Central Institute For Research On Cattle, Meerut Cantt, Uttar Pradesh
  • M BHAKAT Senior Scientist, ICAR, New Delhi
  • S PRASAD Assistant Director General, ICAR, New Delhi
  • S KERKETTA Scientist, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Neemuch

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v88i12.85810

Keywords:

Crossbred cows, Herringbone milking parlour, Milkability, Milking irregularities, Pulsation ratio

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bade R D, Reinemann D J, Zucali M, Ruegg P L and Thompson P D. 2009. Interaction of vacuum, b-phase duration and liner compression on milk flow rates in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 913–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1180

Fahim A, Kamboj M L, Prasad S, Sirohi A S, Bhakat M, Mohanty T K and Malhotra R. 2017. Effect of parity, stage of lactation and udder type on milkability of crossbred dairy cows milked in automated herringbone milking parlour. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 87(6): 761–67.

Ferneborg S and Svennersten-Sjaunja K. 2015. The effect of pulsation ratio on teat condition, milk somatic cell count and productivity in dairy cows in automatic milking. Journal of Dairy Research 82(4): 453–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029915000515

Gleeson D E, O’Callaghan E J and Rath M V. 2004. Effect of liner design, pulsator setting, and vacuum level on bovine teat tissue changes and milking characteristics as measured by ultrasonography. Irish Veterinary Journal 57(5): 289–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-0481-57-5-289

Mein G A and Reid D A. 1996. Milking-time tests and guidelines for milking units. Proceedings of the 35th National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting, Nashville, Tennessee. pp 235–44.

Ruegg P, Rasmussen M D and Reinemann D. 2005. The seven habits of highly successful milking routines. Milk Money 3: 61–69.

Strapak P, Antalik P and Szencziová I. 2011. Milkability evaluation of Holstein dairy cows by Lactocorder. Journal of Agrobiology 28(2): 139–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10146-011-0015-6

Strobel U, Rose-Meierhofer S, Oz H, Ammon C, Luhdo T and Brunsch R. 2016. Evaluation of teat-end vacuum conditions as affected by different pulsation settings in a quarterindividual milking system. Applied Agricultural Forestry Research 66(2): 1–11.

Svennersten-Sjaunja K M and Pettersson G. 2008. Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe. Journal of Animal Science 86(13 Suppl): 37–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0527

Thomas C V, Bray D R and Delorenzo M A. 1993. Evaluation of 50:50 and 70:30 pulsarion ratios in a large commercial dairy herd. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 1298–04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77460-3

Downloads

Submitted

2018-12-28

Published

2018-12-28

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

FAHIM, A., KAMBOJ, M. L., SIROHI, A. S., BHAKAT, M., PRASAD, S., & KERKETTA, S. (2018). Standardization of pulsation ratios in crossbred cows milked in automated herringbone milking parlour. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 88(12), 1416-1418. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v88i12.85810
Citation