Nutritional portfolio of maize and cowpea fodder under various intercropping ratio and balanced nitrogen fertilization

AKANKSHA TAMTA; RAKESH KUMAR; HARDEV RAM; R K MEENA; UTTAM KUMAR; M R YADAV; D J SUBRAHMANYA; ADRASH KUMAR PANDEY

doi:10.56093/ijans.v89i3.88041

Authors

AKANKSHA TAMTA Research Scholar, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 13201 India
RAKESH KUMAR Principal Scientist, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 13201 India
HARDEV RAM Scientist, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 13201 India
R K MEENA Scientist, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 13201 India
UTTAM KUMAR Chief Technical Officer, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 13201 India
M R YADAV Research Scholar, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 13201 India
D J SUBRAHMANYA Research Scholar, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 13201 India
ADRASH KUMAR PANDEY Research Scholar, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana 13201 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i3.88041

Keywords:

Cowpea fodder, Forage Quality, Intercropping, Maize, Nitrogen

Abstract

Cerealâ€“legume mixture may be a viable option to improve forage yield and quality. Furthermore, nitrogen requirement may also varying according to proportion of legume component. Therefore, the present study was carried out to evaluate the effect of different intercropping ratios and nitrogen levels on productivity and nutritional quality of fodder maize (Zea mays L.) and Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). The experiment was laid out in split plot arrangement with three intercropping row ratios of maize: cowpea (1:1, 2:1 and 1:2, respectively) in main plot and five nitrogen levels (0, 30, 60, 90 and 120 kg N/ha) in sub plot. Highest total green fodder, protein and ash yield in 2:1 ratio whereas maximum ether yield was reported in 1:2 intercropping ratio of maize and cowpea. However, the maximum crude protein, ether extract, ash content and lowest NDF, ADF and ADL of maize and cowpea, respectively were obtained under 1:2 intercropping ratio of maize and cowpea. Among N levels, highest total green fodder, crude protein, ether and ash yield and as well as their content in green forage of maize and cowpea were recorded with the use of 120 kg N/ha. However, cowpea responded significantly upto 60 kg N/ha only. The lowest NDF, ADF and ADL of maize and cowpea were found when these crops fertilized with 120 Kg N/ha. A significant interaction between intercropping ratios and N levels was reported in terms of yield. Thus, it can be concluded that nitrogen rates 90, 120 and 60 kg/ha found suitable to achieve maximum fodder yield in 1:1, 2:1 and 1:2 (maize: cowpea) ratios, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 18th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia, USA. Ayub M, Nadeem M A, Sharar M S and Mahmood N. 2002.

Response of maize (Zea mays L.) fodder to different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 1: 352–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2002.352.354

Getachew B, Ketema B and Sharma J J. 2013. System productivity of forage legumes intercropped with maize and performance of the component crops in Kombolcha, eastern Ethiopia. East African Journal of Sciences 7: 99–108.

Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Willey and Sons, Singapore. 680 p.

Khan M A, Kakar S, Marwat K B and Khan I A. 2013. Differential response of Zea mays L. in relation to weed control and different macronutrient combinations. Sains Malaysiana 42(10): 1395–1401.

Kumar R, Rathore D K, Singh M, Kumar P and Khippal A. 2016a. Effect of phosphorus and zinc nutrition on growth and yield of fodder cowpea. Legume Research-An International Journal 39(2): 262–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9384

Kumar R, Singh M, Tomar S K, Meena B S and Rathore D K. 2016b. Productivity and nutritive parameters of fodder maize under varying plant density and fertility levels for improved animal productivity. Indian Journal of Animal Research 50(2): 199–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.9423

Kumar R, Singh M, Meena B S, Kumar S, Yadav M R, Parihar C M, Ram H, Meena R K, Meena V K and Kumar U. 2017a. Quality characteristics and nutrient yield of fodder maize (Zea mays) as influenced by seeding density and nutrient levels in Indo-Gangetic Plains. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87(9): 1203–08.

Kumar R, Singh M, Meena B S, Ram H, Parihar C M, Kumar S, Yadav M R, Meena R K, Kumar U and Meena V K. 2017b. Zinc Management effects on Quality and Nutrient Yield of Fodder Maize (Zea mays L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 87(8): 1013–17.

Kumar S, Rawat C R and Melkania N P. 2005. Fodder production potential and economics of maize (Zea mays) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) intercropping under rainfed conditions. Indian Journal of Agronomy 50: 184–86.

Licitra G, Hernandez T M and Van Soest P J. 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57(4): 347–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00837-3

Meena H N and Shivay Y. 2010. Productivity of short-duration summer forage crops and their effect on succeeding aromatic rice in conjunction with gypsum-enriched urea. Indian Journal of Agronomy 55(1): 11–15.

Nadeem M A, Iqbal Z, Ayub M, Mubeen K and Ibrahim M. 2009. Effect of nitrogen application on forage yield and quality of maize sown alone and in mixture with legumes. Pakistan Journal of Life Social Science 7: 161–67.

Parihar C M, Yadav M R, Jat S L, Singh A K, Kumar B, Pooniya V, Pradhan S, Verma R K, Jat M L, Jat R K and Saharawat Y S. 2017. Long Term Conservation Agriculture and Intensified Cropping Systems: Effect on Growth, Yield, Water and Energy- use Efficiency of Maize in North-Western India. Pedosphere DOI:10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60468-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60468-5

Van Soest P J, Robertson J B and Lewis B A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of dairy sciences 74(10): 3583–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2

Yadav M R, Kumar R, Parihar C M, Yadav R K, Jat S L, Ram H, Meena R K, Singh M, Birbal, Verma A P, Kumar U, Ghosh A and Jat M L. 2017b. Strategies for improving nitrogen use efficiency: A review. Agricultural Reviews 38(1): 29–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.v0iOF.7306

Yadav M R, Parihar C M, Jat S L, Singh A K, Kumar D, Pooniya V, Parihar M D, Saveipune D, Parmar H and Jat M L. 2016. Effect of long-term tillage and diversified crop rotations on nutrient uptake, profitability and energetics of maize (Zea mays) in north-western India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86(6): 743–49.

Yadav M R, Parihar C M, Jat S L, Singh A K, Kumar R, Yadav R K, Kuri B R, Parihar M D, Verma A P and Jat M L. 2017a. Long term effect of legume intensified crop rotations and tillage practices on productivity and profitability of maize vis- a-vis soil fertility in North-Western Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Legume Research 40(2): 282–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v0i0.7583