Morphometric and meristic study of four freshwater fish species of river Ganga


802 / 376

Authors

  • NITIN KAMBOJ Assistant Professor, Gurukula Kangri Vishwavidyalaya, Haridwar, Uttarakhand 249 404 India
  • VISHAL KAMBOJ Research Scholar, Gurukula Kangri Vishwavidyalaya, Haridwar, Uttarakhand 249 404 India

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i4.89152

Keywords:

Fish species, Ganga river, Meristic parameters, Morphometric

Abstract

The present study was carried out in Ganga River from Devprayag to Haridwar district of Uttarakhand to analyse morphometric measurement and meristic count of some selected fish species during April 2017 to March 2018. Specimens (20) of each fish species were collected from different zones of river Ganga and 24 morphometric measurements and eight meristic count parameters were studied for each fish species. The total length and weight of Cyprnius carpio ranged from 14–18 cm and 60–78 g; Mahseer fish species 21–28 cm and 120–185 g; 20–26 cm and 100–160 g (Labeo rohita) and 17–25 cm and 20–34 g (Xenentodon cancila) respectively were recorded during the study period. The regression coefficient ‘b’ shows higher growth rate with respect to Total length. It was maximum in case of standard length (b= 1.115) and lowest in pelvic fin length (b=0.146) for Cyprnius carpio, maximum in case of standard length (b=1.132) and lowest in pectoral fin length (b=0.126) for Mahseer, maximum in case of Fork and standard length (b=0.995) and lowest in length of caudal peduncle (b=0.135) for Labeo rohita and maximum in case of standard length (b=1.020) and lowest in case of pelvic fin length (b=0.018) for Xenentodon cancila respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashokan K V, Mundaganur D S and Mundaganur Y D. 2013. Ecto and Endo parasites in Labeo rohita, Major carp (Hamilton) in Krishna river segment in Sangli district. International Journal of Research in Chemistry and Environment 3(3): 16–19.

Badkur R and Prashar A. 2015. Morphometric approach towards growth performance of Mahseer (Tor tor) in river Narmada near Hoshangabad (M.P). Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Research 3(2): 66–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30750/ijpbr.3.2.7

Barlow G W. 1961. Causes and significance of morphological variation in fishes. Systematic Zooogy 10: 105–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2411595

Bhatt J P. 1997. ‘Studies on some aspects of habitat ecology of the Mahseer Tor putitora (Ham.) from foothill-stretch of Ganga in relation to altered ecological conditions.’ DPhil Thesis, HNB Garhwal University, Srinagar (Garhwal).

Cavalcanti M J, Montelro L R and Lopes P R D. 1999. Landmark based Morphometric analysis in selected species of serranid fishes (Perciformes: Teleostel). Zoological Studies 38(3): 287– 94.

Day F. 1878. The fishes of India: being a natural history of the fishes known to inhabit the seas and freshwater of India, Burma and Ceylon. Text and Atlas in two parts. London XX+778, 195. Reprinted in 1994 by Jagmander Book Agency, New Delhi.

Gould S J. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 41: 587–640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1966.tb01624.x

Hubbs C. 1922. Variation in the number of vertebrate and other meristic character of fishes correlated with the temperature of water during development. American Naturalist 56: 360–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/279875

Jayaram K C. 2010. The fresh water fishes of the Indian region. Narendra Publishing House, Delhi.

Johal M S, Negi R K and Negi T. 2003. Age and growth of golden mahseer Tor putitora from Pong reservoir, Himachal Pradesh, India. Himalayan Journal of Environment and Zoology 17(1): 17–29.

National River Conservation Directorate (NRCD). 2009. Status paper on River Ganga: State of Environment and Water Quality. Ministry of Environment and Forests, New Delhi.

Nautiyal P and Lal M S. 1988. Natural history of Garhwal Himalayan Mahseer: Racial composition. Indian Journal of Animal Science 58(2): 283–94.

Rahman A K A. 1989. Freshwater fishes of Bangladesh. 1st ed, Zoological Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh. pp 183.

Ram N S, Chhote L Y and Arvind K S. 2015. Dimethoate induced alterations in tissue protein levels of common carp, Cyprnius carpio (Linn.). International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences 2(3): 176–82.

Shrestha T K. 1990. Rare fishes of Himalayan waters of Nepal. Journal of fish biology 37: 213–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1990.tb05042.x

Talwar P K and Jhingran A G. 1991. Inland Fishes of India and Adjacent Countries. Vol. 1 and 2. Oxford & IBH publishing house, New Delhi.

Ujjania N C, Kumar G, Langar R K and Krishna G. 2012. Biometric studies of Mahseer (Tor tor Ham. 1822) from Bari Talab (Udaipur), India. International Research Journal of Biological Sciences 2(3): 138–41.

Weber M J, Brown M L and Wills D W. 2010. Spatial variability of common carp population in relation to take morphology and physicochemical parameters in the upper Midwest united states. Ecology of freshwater fish 19(4): 555–65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0633.2010.00436.x

Zafar M, Nazir A, Akhtar N, Mehdi Naqvi S M H and Zia-ur- Rehman M. 2002. Studies on meristic counts and Morphometric measurements of Mahseer (Tor putitora) from a spawing ground of Himalayan foot-hill River Korang Islamabad, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 5(6): 733–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2002.733.735

Downloads

Submitted

2019-04-23

Published

2019-04-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

KAMBOJ, N., & KAMBOJ, V. (2019). Morphometric and meristic study of four freshwater fish species of river Ganga. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 89(4), 470–473. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i4.89152
Citation