Effect of commercial guar meal (CGM) on the performance and nutrient utilization in broilers


Abstract views: 157 / PDF downloads: 133

Authors

  • M HANUMANTH RAO Assistant Professor, PV Narsimha Rao Telangana Veterinary University, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
  • V RAVINDER REDD Professor, College of Veterinary Science, Hyderabad, Telangana
  • S V RAMA RAO Principal Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Hyderabad, Telangana
  • M SHASHI KUMAR Professor, College of Veterinary Science, Hyderabad, Telangana
  • N NALINI KUMARI Professor, College of Veterinary Science, Korutla, Telangana.
  • GURRAM SRINIVAS PV Narsimha Rao Telangana Veterinary University, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
  • T RAGHUNANDHAN Professor, College of Veterinary Science, Korutla, Telangana

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i5.90026

Keywords:

Body weight, Broiler, Commercial guar meal, Feed conversion ratio, Nutrient utilization

Abstract

A biological trial was undertaken to study the effect of inclusion of graded levels of commercial guar meal (CGM) in diet on the performance and nutrient digestibility in commercial broiler chickens. A total of 350 oneday- old broiler male chicks (Cobb 400) were reared on wire floor electrically heated battery brooders. The chicks were randomly divided into 7 groups. Each treatment had 10 replicates of 5 chicks each. All the groups received iso-nitrogenous and iso-caloric diets. First group was fed maize-SBM; 2nd, 3rd and 4th groups were fed control diet during pre-starter phase (1–14 days), later (starter and finisher phase) CGM was incorporated at 6, 12 and 18% respectively, replacing SBM. In rest 3 groups (5th, 6th and 7th), CGM was incorporated at 6% during pre-starter phase followed by (starter and finisher phase) incorporation of CGM at 6, 12 and 18% respectively. The results showed that body weight gain (BWG) was significantly better at 6% CGM inclusion and depressed at 12 and 18% CGM. There was no significant effect of non-inclusion of CGM in juvenile phase on BWG; though feed intake did not differ significantly by CGM inclusion but FCR was significantly higher at all inclusion levels of CGM (6, 12 and 18%). The slaughter parameters, nutrient digestibility, serum parameters did not differ significantly. It can be concluded that CGM could be incorporated up to 6% (60 g/kg diet) in broiler diets without affecting growth performance, nutrient utilization and slaughter variables.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA.

Bhutia S. 2006. ‘Nutritive value of toasted guar meal with or without enzyme supplementation in broiler quail ration.’ MVSc Thesis, Deemed University, IVRI, Izatnagar, India.

Brahma T C and Siddiqui S M. 1978. A preliminary study on the utilization of toasted guar meal in broiler rations. Indian Poultry Gazette 62(4): 133–38.

Conner S R. 2002. ‘Characterization of guar meal for use in poultry rations.’ PhD Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

Dinani O P, Pramod K T, Shrivastav A K and Tyagi P K. 2010. Effect of feeding fermented guar meal vis-à-vis toasted guar meal with or without enzyme supplementation on performance of broiler quails. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 45(2): 150– 56.

Gheisari A A, Shavakhi Zavareh M, Toghyani M, Bahadoran R and Toghyani M. 2011. Application of incremental program, an effective way to optimize dietary inclusion rate of guar meal in broiler chicks. Livestock Science 140: 117–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.02.018

Kamran M, Talat N P, Athar M and Zulfiqar A. 2002. Effect of Commercial enzyme (Natugrain) supplementation on the nutritive value and inclusion rate of guar meal in broiler rations. International Journal of Poultry Science 6: 167–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2002.167.173

Lee J T, Bailey C A and Cartwright A L. 2003. Guar meal germ and hull fractions differently affect growth performance and intestinal viscosity of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 82: 1589–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.10.1589

Lee J T, Connor-Appleton S, Bailey C A and Cartwright A L. 2005. Effects of guar meal by-product with and without - mannanase hemicell on broiler performance. Poultry Science 84: 1261–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.8.1261

Llames C and Fontaine Y. 1994. Determination of amino acids in feeds: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 77: 1262–1402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/77.6.1362

Prasad D, Thakur R S, Sagar V and Pardhan K. 1981. Influence of dietary fat and guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) meal on the energy utilization by broilers. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 16: 187–93.

Potter L M, Pudelkiewiez W J, Webster L and Matterson L D. 1962. Metabolizable energy and digestibility evaluation of fish meal for chickens. Poultry Science 41: 1745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0411745

Rainbird A L, Low A G and Zebrowska T. 1984. Effect of guar gum on glucose and water absorption from isolated loops of jejunum in conscious growing pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 52: 489–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19840116

Rama Rao S V, Prakash B, Raju M V L N, Panda A K and Murthy O K. 2014. Effect of supplementing non-starch polysaccharide hydrolyzing enzymes in guar meal based diets on performance, carcass variables and bone mineralization in Vanaraja chicken. Animal Feed Science and Technology 188: 85–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.021

Talapatra S K, Roy S C and Sen K C. 1940. Estimation of phosphorus, choline, calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium in feeding stuffs. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science 10: 243.

Tyagi Pramod K, Mandal A B and Tyagi Praveen K. 2011. Utilization of roasted guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) korma in the diet of broiler chickens. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 46(3): 326–29.

Verma S V S and McNab J H. 1982. Guar meal in diets for broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 23: 95–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071688208447935

Verma S V S and McNab J M. 1984. Chemical, biochemical and microbiological examination of guar meal. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 19: 165–70.

Downloads

Submitted

2019-05-23

Published

2019-05-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

RAO, M. H., REDD, V. R., RAO, S. V. R., KUMAR, M. S., KUMARI, N. N., SRINIVAS, G., & RAGHUNANDHAN, T. (2019). Effect of commercial guar meal (CGM) on the performance and nutrient utilization in broilers. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 89(5), 556–561. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i5.90026
Citation