Evaluation of two way cross developed for free range poultry farming under farm and free range conditions

U RAJKUMAR; S HAUNSHI; C PASWAN; B PRAKASH; M K PADHI; S V RAMA RAO

doi:10.56093/ijans.v89i6.91137

Authors

U RAJKUMAR Principal Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
S HAUNSHI Principal Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
C PASWAN Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
B PRAKASH Senior Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana 500 030 India
M K PADHI Principal Scientist, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute Regional Station, Bhubaneswar, Odisha
S V RAMA RAO Principal Scientist, ICAR-Central Avian Research Institute Regional Station, Bhubaneswar, Odisha

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i6.91137

Keywords:

Backyard poultry, Cross, Egg production, Free range poultry, Growth

Abstract

A comprehensive study was conducted to evaluate the performance of a two way cross developed for free range poultry farming under farm and field conditions. Chicks (412) produced by mating PD-1 males with PD-4 females in single hatch were utilized for the study. The data collected on 200 chicks from field and 193 chicks from farm were analysed to study the effect of system of rearing on growth and production performance. The body weights were significantly higher in males from 6â€“12 weeks of age revealing sexual dimorphism in birds both under farm and field conditions. The shanks were significantly longer in males. The mean dressing percentage was 68.51Â±2.82. Legs contributed 21.90Â±0.23% of live weight, followed by back, breast and wings. Abdominal fat proportion was 0.5% of body weight. The adult body weights were significantly higher in farm reared hens. The age at sexual maturity (ASM) was significantly higher in free range hens (205.12Â±18.23 days) compared to farm reared hens (152.35Â±1.03 days). The egg weights were significantly higher in farm reared birds at 40 and 52 weeks of age. The part period egg production up to 40 and 52 weeks of age was significantly higher in farm reared birds (69.22Â±3.89 and 122.54Â±4.64) than free range birds (43.42Â±4.62 and 83.74Â±8.12). The annual egg production (72 weeks) was 189.61Â±6.72 eggs in farm conditions. The peak production (17.12 eggs) reached at 25â€“28 weeks and maintained till 49â€“52 weeks of age in farm conditions. Under free range conditions, the peak production was attained at 37â€“40 weeks of age and maintained up to 45â€“48 weeks. It can be concluded that, the performance of the cross is quite encouraging under free range conditions with good growth rate and high production potential compared to indigenous/ native chickens, offering a bright scope as a promising dual purpose chicken variety for free range poultry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelqader A, Wollny C B and Gaudy M. 2007. Characterization of local chicken production systems and their potential under different levels of management practices in Jordon. Tropical Animal Health and Production 39: 155–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007-9000-x

Ajayi F O and Ejiofor O. 2009. Effect of genotype × sex interaction on growth and some development characteristics of Ross and Anak broiler strains in the high rain forest zone of Nigeria. Asian Journal of Poultry Science 3: 31–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2009.51.56

Aklilu H A, Almekinders C J M and Van der Zijpp A J. 2007. Village poultry consumption and marketing in relation to gender, religious festivals and market access. Tropical Animal Health and Production 39:165–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-007-9002-8

Ayyagari V. 2008. Development of varieties for rural poultry. Souvenir Seminar on Sustainable Poultry Production: Rural and Commercial Approach. 3rd March, Hyderabad, India. pp. 1–5.

Bell D D. 2002. Cage management for layers. Commercial Chicken Meat and Egg Production. (Eds) Bell D D and Weaver W D. 5th edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Massachusetts, USA. pp 1007–1040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0811-3_52

Dessie T, Taye T, Dana N, Ayalew W and Hanotte O. 2011. Current state of knowledge on phenotypic characteristics of indigenous chickens in the tropics. World’s Poultry Science Journal 67: 507–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933911000559

Ghanem H H, Attia Y A, El-Tahawy W S and Nawar A N. 2012. Developing a three-way cross of chicken for improving egg production traits 1-heterosis effect and analysis of DNA polymorphism using RAPD-PCR. Egypt Journal of Poultry Science 32: 833–49.

Haunshi S, Doley S and Shakutala I. 2009. Production performance of indigenous chicken of northeastern region and improved varieties developed for backyard farming. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 79: 901–05.

Haunshi S, Sunitha R, Shanmugam M, Padhi M K and Niranjan M. 2013. Carcass characteristics and chemical composition of breast and thigh muscles of native chicken breeds. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 48: 219–22.

Khan A G. 2008. Indigenous breeds, crossbreds and synthetic hybrids with modified genetic and economic profiles for rural family and small scale poultry farming in India. World’s Poultry Science Journal 64: 405–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933908000135

Muchadeyi F C, Sibanda S, Kusina N T, Kusina J F and Makuza S. 2004. The village chicken production system in Rushinga District of Zimbabwe. Livestock Research for Rural Development 16(40). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/6/much16040.htm.

Niranjan M, Sharma R P, Rajkumar U, Reddy B L N, Chatterjee R N and Bhattacharya T K. 2008. Comparative evaluation of production performance in improved chicken varieties for backyard farming. International Journal of Poultry Sciences 7: 1126–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.1128.1131

Padhi M K, Rajkumar U, Haunshi S, Niranjan M, Panda A K, Bhattacharya T K, Reddy M R, Bhanja S K and Reddy B L N. 2012. Comparative evaluation of male line of Vanaraja, Control broiler, Vanaraja commercial in respect to juvenile and carcass quality traits. Indian Journal of Poultry Science 47: 136-–39.

Padhi M K and Chatterjee R N. 2013. Carcass quality traits in four different crossbreds developed for backyard poultry and the effect of age on carcass quality under intensive system of rearing. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83: 1102–08.

Padhi M K, Chatterjee R N and Rajkumar U. 2014. A study on performance of a crossbred chicken developed using both exotic and indigenous breeds under backyard system of rearing. Journal of Poultry Science and Technology 2: 26–29.

Padhi M K, Chatterjee R N, Rajkumar U, Niranjan M and Haunshi S. 2016. Evaluation of a three-way cross chicken developed for backyard poultry in respect to growth, production and carcass quality traits under intensive system of rearing. Journal of Applied Animal Research 44: 390–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2015.1091336

Pica-ciamarra U and Otte J. 2010. Poultry food security and poverty in India: looking beyond the farm-gate. World’s Poultry Science Journal 66: 309–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933910000358

Rajkumar U, Haunshi S, Paswan C, Raju M V L N, RamaRao S V and Chatterjee R N. 2017. Characterization of indigenous Aseel chicken breed for morphological, growth, production and meat composition traits from India. Poultry Science 96: 2120–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew492

Rajkumar U, Haunshi S, Paswan C and Reddy B L N. 2018. Evaluation of three way crossbred chicken developed for rural poultry under farm and backyard conditions for growth and production traits. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 88: 229– 32.

Rajkumar U, Muthukumar M, Haunshi S, Niranjan M, Raju M V L N, RamaRao S V and Chatterjee R N. 2016. Comparative evaluation of carcass traits and meat quality in native Aseel chickens and commercial broilers. British Poultry Science 57: 339–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2016.1162282

Rajkumar U, RamaRao S V and Sharma R P. 2010. Backyard poultry farming: Changing the face of rural India. Indian Farming 59: 20–23.

Rajkumar U, Sharma R P, Haunshi S, Padhi M K, Rajaravindra K S, Reddy B L N, Niranjan M, Bhattacharya T K, Haunshi S and Chatterjee R N. 2011. Genetic analysis of juvenile growth and carcass traits in a full diallel mating in selected coloured broiler lines. Tropical Animal Health Production 43: 1129– 36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9812-6

Sambo E, Betridge J, Dessie T, Amare A, Habte T, Wigley P and Chridtley R M. 2015. Participatory evaluation of chicken health and production constraints in Ethiopia. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 118: 117–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.10.014

Sarsenbek A, Wang T, Zhao J K and Jiang W. 2013. Comparison of carcass yields and meat quality between Baicheng-You chickens and Arbor Acres broilers. Poultry Science 92: 2776– 82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02841

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.

Teklewold H, Dadi L, Yami A and Dana N. 2006. Determinants of adoption of poultry technology a double hurdle approach. Livestock Research Rural Development. Vol 18. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd18/3/tekl18040.htm.