Lifetime reproductive performance of Chokla sheep at an organized farm in semi-arid conditions


348 / 219

Authors

  • ARNAV MEHROTRA PhD Scholar, Division of Animal Genetics and Breeding, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatngar, Uttar Pradesh
  • URMILA PANNU Professor, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatngar, Uttar Pradesh
  • ASHISH CHOPRA Senior Scientist, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatngar, Uttar Pradesh
  • H K NARULA Principal Scientist, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatngar, Uttar Pradesh
  • L L L PRINCE Senior Scientist, ICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Hyderabad, Telangana.

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i8.93028

Keywords:

Chokla sheep, Ewe efficiency, Heritability, Least squares, Lifetime productivity

Abstract

The Chokla sheep, renowned as the finest carpet wool producer of India, plays an important role in supporting the rural economy of the arid and semi-arid regions of its native state of Rajasthan. This study was carried out to assess the lifetime reproductive efficiency of Chokla ewes by analyzing the records of 1,001 ewes bearing 3,541 lambs over a period of 22 years (1994–2016) to assess five traits, namely total lambs born (TLB; 3.38±0.11 lambs), total lambs weaned (TLW; 2.97±0.11 lambs), cumulative lamb weights at birth (TLBW; 9.59±0.37 kg), weaning (TLWW; 39.59±1.68 kg) and 12 months of age (TLAW; 50.15±2.51 kg) produced by an ewe in her lifetime. Period of birth of ewe had a significant effect on all the traits whereas season of birth, inbreeding coefficient and birth weight of ewe had no influence. REML procedures were employed to estimate the genetic parameters through an animal model. Analysis revealed low heritability estimates for the lifetime reproductive traits (TLB; 0.06±0.04, TLW; 0.05±0.04, TLBW; 0.09±0.05, TLWW; 0.05±0.04 and TLAW; 0.02±0.04), suggesting greater role of environmental and managemental factors. Positive correlation among cumulative lamb weights (0.51–0.92) suggested selection for birth weights would result in higher weights at subsequent life stages of lambs. The low heritability estimates and high CV% for all the traits suggest the suitability of a management focussed approach for improvement of lifetime reproductive performance of ewes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arora C L and Garg R C. 1998. Sheep production and Breeding. International Book Distributing Company.

Duguma G, Schoeman S J, Cloete S W P and Jordaan G F. 2002. Genetic and environmental parameters for ewe productivity in Merinos. South African Journal of Animal Sciences 32(3): 154–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v32i3.3740

Duncan D B. 1957. Multiple range tests for correlated and heteroscedastic means. Biometrics 13(2): 164–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2527799

Falconer D S. 1960. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, London.

Gowane G R, Prince L L L, Paswan C, Misra S S, Sharma R C and Naqvi S M K. 2014. Genetic analysis of reproductive and fitness traits of Malpura sheep in semi-arid tropics of India. Agricultural Research 3(1): 75–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-014-0091-0

SAS Institute. 2011. SAS/IML 9.3 User’s guide. Sas Institute.

Jafari S and Manafiazar G. 2016. Estimates of genetic parameters for lifetime reproductive performance traits in Makuie ewes. Small Ruminant Research 139: 67–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.05.006

Jain A, Singh G and Yadav D K. 2009. Chokla-an endangered sheep genetic resource. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 79(10): 1071–72.

Kinghorn B and Kinghorn S. 2003. Pedigree viewer. Armidale, Australia: University of New England.

Meyer K. 2007. WOMBAT—A tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). Journal of Zhejiang University Science 8(11): 815– 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.2007.B0815

Mishra A K, Arora A L, Kumar S, Gupta D C and Singh V K. 2007. Ewe productivity efficiency of single and multiple lambs bearing of Garole, Malpura and their crossbred ewes. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 77(8): 70–74.

Narula H K, Yadav S B S, Sharma P R and Mehrotra V. 2009. Growth and reproductive performance of Magra sheep of Rajasthan. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 79(6): 639–41.

Notter D R, Ngere L, Burke J M, Miller J E and Morgan J L M. 2018. Genetic parameters for ewe reproductive performance and peri-parturient fecal egg counts and their genetic relationships with lamb body weights and fecal egg counts in Katahdin sheep. Journal of Animal Sciences 96(5): 1579–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky100

Olivier J J. 2002. The South African National Small Stock Improvement Scheme. International Livestock Research Institute.

Olivier W J, Snyman M A, Olivier J J, Wyk J B Van and Erasmus G J. 2001. Direct and correlated responses to selection for total weight of lamb weaned in Merino sheep. South African Journal of Animal Science 31(2): 115–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v31i2.3837

Vatankhah M. 2016. Phenotypic and genetic factors affecting on reproductive lifetime of Lori Bakhtiari Ewes. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science 6(1): 125–31.

Zishiri O T, Cloete S W P, Olivier J J and Dzama K. 2013. Genetic parameters for growth, reproduction and fitness traits in the South African Dorper sheep breed. Small Ruminant Research 112(1–3): 39–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2013.01.004

Downloads

Submitted

2019-08-23

Published

2019-08-26

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MEHROTRA, A., PANNU, U., CHOPRA, A., NARULA, H. K., & PRINCE, L. L. L. (2019). Lifetime reproductive performance of Chokla sheep at an organized farm in semi-arid conditions. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 89(8), 894–897. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i8.93028
Citation