Lame cows have a subdued hypothalamus-pituitary axis as revealed by LH release in response to exogenous endocrine challenges

PANKAJ SOOD; A S NANDA; A S NANDA; B S PRAKASH

doi:10.56093/ijans.v89i9.93754

Authors

PANKAJ SOOD Professor and Head, Department of Veterinary Clinical Complex, DGCN College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh
A S NANDA Vice Chancellor, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141 004 India
A S NANDA Principal Scientist, Stress Physiology Lab, ICAR-National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Bengaluru, Karnataka
B S PRAKASH Additional Director General (Former), ICAR, New Delhi.

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i9.93754

Keywords:

Cows, Endocrine challenge, Exogenous, Lameness, LH production

Abstract

Lameness is a serious concern in cows due to its multilevel effects and increasing incidences. The ability of anterior pituitary and hypothalamus to release LH, a prime reproductive hormone, is unknown in lame cows. Our study tested this ability by exogenous endocrine challenge using Buserelin acetate (GnRH analogue) and estradiol valerate (EV). The study included moderately lame (L; n=7) either cyclic (LC; n=3) or anestrus (LA; n=4); and normal cyclic, nonâ€“lame (NL; n=5) cows. Progesterone blocks LH release, so it was lowered by injecting PG in cyclic cows. After 14 h, all cows were given a walk for 5 min and immediately thereafter injected with 0.008 mg GnRH and 4 h later with 1 mg of EV. Blood plasma progesterone, cortisol and LH were quantified, periodically. There was a significant delay in the onset (105.0 vs 75.0Â±7.0 vs 54.0Â±9.0 min) and duration (22.5Â±5.3 vs 80.0Â±10.8 vs 117.0Â±2.7 min) of LH surge in LA vs LC vs NL cows; the surge was absent in two LA cows. The altered LH profile was attributed to a 3 fold (in L) vs 1.6 fold (in NL) rise in cortisol. LH released (ng/ml) in response to EV was also low in LA (31.5Â±2.4) and LC (69.9Â±7.2) than NL (79.2Â±7.0) cows. In conclusion, lame cows subjected to walk exhibited reduced pituitary response to release LH following exogenous GnRH as also a reduced ability of hypothalamus to stimulate LH release in response to exogenous estradiol.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alawneh J I, Stevenson M A, Williamson N B, Lopez-Villalobos N and Otley T. 2012. The effect of clinical lameness on live weight in a seasonally calving, pasture-fed dairy herd. Journal of Dairy Science 95: 663–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4505

Crowe M A and Mullen M P. 2013. Regulation and function of gonadotropins throughout the bovine oestrous cycle.

Gonadotropin. (Ed) Vizcarra J. Intech Open da Rosa G O and Wagner W C. 1981. Adrenal gonad interaction in cattle. Corpus luteum functions in intact and adreanectomised heifers. Journal of Animal Science 52: 1098– 105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1981.5251098x

Daley C A, Macfarlane M S, Sakurai H and Adams T E. 1999. Stress like concentrations of cortisol block can delay the pre- ovulatory surge of LH in sheep. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 117: 11–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1170011

Dobson H and Alam M G S. 1987. Preliminary investigations into the endocrine systems of subfertile cattle: location of a common lesion (rate-limiting step). Journal of Endocrinology 113: 167–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.1130167

Dobson H, Essawy S A and Alam M G S. 1988. Suppression of LH response to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone or estradiol by ACTH (1–24) treatment in anoestrous ewes. Journal of Endocrinology 118: 193–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.1180193

Dodson S E, Mcleod B J, Haresign W, Peters A R and Lamming G E. 1988. Endocrine changes from birth to puberty in heifers. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 82: 527–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0820527

Ganong W F. 1991. Review of Medical Physiology. 4th edn, pp. 334–59. Prentice Hall International Incorporation, UK.

Goodman R L, Havern R L and Whisnant C S. 1996. Alpha adrenergic neurons inhibit luteinising hormone pulse amplitude in breeding season ewes. Biology of Reproduction 54: 380– 86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod54.2.380

Hobson W C and Hansel W. 1972. Plasma LH levels after ovariectomy, corpus luteum removal and estradiol administration in cattle. Endocrinology 91: 185–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-91-1-185

Jain M K, Iyengar S R K and Jain R K. 1993. Numerical Methods for Scientific and Engineering Computation. New Age International Publications, New Delhi.

Kamboj M and Prakash B S. 1993. Relationship of progesterone in plasma and whole milk of buffaloes during cyclicity and early pregnancy. Tropical Animal Health Production 25: 185– 92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236239

Kanchev L N, Dobson H and Stankov B M. 1984. Early pituitary LH response to injection of GnRH in cows. Theriogenology 21: 407–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(84)90402-3

McNeilly A S and Baird D T. 1983. Direct effect of prolactin, induced by TRH injection, on ovarian estradiol secretion in the ewe. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 69: 559–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0690559

Nanda A S. 1989. ‘Stress and cystic ovarian disease in dairy cows’. Ph.D Thesis, University of Liverpool, South Wirral, UK. Oriowo M A, Landgren B M, Stenström B and Diczfalusy E. 1980. A comparison of the pharmacokinetic properties of three estradiol esters. Contraception 21: 415–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-7824(80)80018-7

Prakash B S and Madan M L. 1984. Radioimmunoassay of cortisol in peripheral blood plasma of buffaloes peripartum. Theriogenology 22: 241–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(84)90481-3

Prakash B S, Paul V and Anandlakshmi N. 2002. Development and validation of a sample, sensitive, second antibody format enzyme immunoassay for LH determination in plasma. Journal of Immunological Methods 270: 281–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1759(02)00301-0

Shutt D A and Fell L R. 1985. Comparison of total and free cortisol in bovine serum and milk or colostrums. Journal of Dairy Science 68: 1832–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)81035-3

Sood P and Nanda A S. 2013. Lameness in crossbred cows: Prevalence, host level risk factors and reproductive performance. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83: 379–82.

Sood P, Nanda A S, Ghuman S P S and Prabhakar S. 2012. A brief locomotion is stressful in lame crossbred cows. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 82: 479–80.

Sood P and Nanda A S. 2013. Lameness in crossbred cows: Prevalence, host level risk factors and reproductive performance. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 83: 379–82.

Sood P, Nanda A S and Singh N. 2009a. Effect of lameness on follicular dynamics in postpartum anestrous crossbred cows.

Veterinarski Arhiv 79: 531–42.

Sood P, Nanda A S, Singh N, Javed M and Prasad R. 2009b. Effect of lameness on follicular dynamics in crossbred cows. Veterinarski Arhiv 79: 131–41.

Sood P and Nanda A S. 2006. Effect of lameness on estrous behaviour in crossbred cows. Theriogenology 66: 1375–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.04.031

Sood P, Zachut M, Dube H and Moallem U. 2015. Behavioural and hormonal pattern of repeat breeder cows around estrus. Reproduction 149: 545–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-14-0598

Tadich N, Flor E and Green L. 2010. Associations between hoof lesions and locomotion score in 1098 unsound dairy cows. Veterinary Journal 184: 60–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.01.005

Wells S J, Ott S L and Seitzinge A H. 1998. Key health issues for dairy cattle – new and old. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 3029– 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75867-9

Wells S J, Trent A M, Marsh W E and Robinson R A. 1993. Prevalence and severity of lameness in lactating dairy cows in a sample of Minnesota and Wisconsin herds. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 202: 78–82.

Zaied A A, Garverick H A, Kesler D J, Bierschwal C J, Elmore R G and Youngquist R S. 1981. Luteinizing hormone response to estradiol benzoate in cows postpartum and cows with ovarian cysts. Theriogenology 16: 349–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(81)90019-4