Comparative evaluation of Lactobacillus strains with different adhesion ability on growth performance and immunomodulatory activity in broiler chickens


290 / 203

Authors

  • LI CAO Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China
  • XIAO-HONG WU Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China
  • XUE-YANG WANG Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China
  • GE-GE LI Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, Henan, China

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i9.93781

Keywords:

Adherence ability, Growth performance, Immune organs indices, Lactobacillus

Abstract

The study was designed to assess the effect of 2 Lactobacillus strains (Lactobacillus kefiri 1.3207 and Lactobacillus plantarum 1.2567) with different adherence ability on growth performance and immunomodulatory activity in broiler. The BW and FCR were higher in L. kefiri 1.3207 and L. plantarum 1.2567 groups compared to control group at 42 days of age, and BW of broilers in L. kefiri 1.3207 group was significantly higher than that in L. plantarum 1.2567 group. IgA and IgG contents and the spleen and bursa of Fabricius indices in significantly increased in the L. kefiri 1.3207 group, but not in the L. plantarum 1.2567-treated group. L. kefiri 1.3207 had more significant effect on growth performance, plasma IgA and IgG levels and immune organs indices because it had better adhesion ability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Giri S S, Sukumaran V and Oviya M. 2013. Potential probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum VSG3 improves the growth, immunity, and disease resistance of tropical freshwater fish, Labeo rohita. Fish and Shellfish Immunology 34: 660–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2012.12.008

Heckert R A, Estevez I, Russek-Cohen E and Pettit-Riley R. 2002. Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. Poultry Science 81: 451–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.4.451

Huang M K, Choi Y J, Houde R, Lee J W, Lee B and Zhao X. 2004. Effects of lactobacilli and an acidophilic fungus on the production performance and immune responses in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 83: 788–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.5.788

Kalavathy R, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S and Ho Y W. 2003. Effects of Lactobacillus cultures on growth performance, abdominal fat deposition, serum lipids and weight of organs of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 44: 139–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166031000085445

Kotzampassi K and Giamarellos-Bourboulis E J. 2012. Probiotics for infectious diseases: more drugs, less dietary supplementation. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 40: 288–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.06.006

Kritas S K, Marubashi T, Filioussis G, Petridou E, Christodoulopoulos G, Burriel A R, Tzivara A, Theodoridis A and Piskorikova M. 2015. Reproductive performance of sows was improved by administration of a sporing bacillary probiotic (Bacillus subtilis C-3102). Journal of Animal Science 93: 405–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-7651

Li S P, Zhao X J and Wang J Y. 2009. Synergy of Astragalus polysaccharides and probiotics (Lactobacillus and Bacillus cereus) on immunity and intestinal microbiota in chicks. Poultry Science 88: 519–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00365

Liu J R, Lai S F and Yu B. 2007. Evaluation of an intestinal Lactobacillus reuteri strain expressing rumen fungal xylanase as a probiotic for broiler chickens fed on a wheat-based diet. British Poultry Science 48: 507–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660701485034

Maassen C B, Boersma W J, van Holten-Neelen C, Claassen E and Laman J D. 2003. Growth phase of orally administered Lactobacillus strains differentially affects IgG1/IgG2a ratio for soluble antigens: implications for vaccine development. Vaccine 21: 2751–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00220-2

Macpherson A J and Uhr T. 2004. Compartmentalization of the mucosal immune responses to commensal intestinal bacteria. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1029: 36–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1309.005

Mishra V and Prasad D N. 2005. Application of in vitro methods for selection of Lactobacillus casei strains as potential probiotics. International Journal of Food Microbiology 103: 109–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.10.047

Mountzouris K C, Tsitrsikos P, Palamidi I, Arvaniti A, Mohnl M, Schatzmayr G and Fegeros K. 2010. Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and cecal microflora composition. Poultry Science 89: 58–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00308

Nielsen O H, Jorgensen S, Pedersen K and Justesen T. 1994. Microbiological evaluation of jejunal aspirates and faecal samples after oral administration of bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 76: 469–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1994.tb01104.x

Peng Q, Zeng X F, Zhu J L, Wang S, Liu X T, Hou C L, Thacker P A and Qiao S Y. 2016. Effects of dietary Lactobacillus plantarum B1 on growth performance, intestinal microbiota, and short chain fatty acid profiles in broiler chickens. Poultry Science 95: 893–900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev435

Pourgholam M A, Khara H, Safari R, Sadati M A and Aramli M S. 2016. Dietary administration of Lactobacillus plantarum enhanced growth performance and innate immune response of siberian sturgeon, Acipenser baerii. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins 8: 1–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-015-9205-7

Reid G and McCormick J K. 2002. Time for probiotics. The Lancet Infect Disease 2: 459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00340-7

Rhee K J, Sethupathi P, Driks A, Lanning D K and Knight K L. 2004. Role of commensal bacteria in development of gut- associated lymphoid tissues and preimmune antibody repertoire. Journal of Immunology 172: 1118–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.172.2.1118

Slawinska A, Siwek M, Zylinska J, Bardowski J, Brzezinska J, Gulewicz K A, Nowak M, Urbanowski M, Plowiec A and Bednarczyk M. 2014. Influence of synbiotics delivered in ovo on immune organs development and structure. Folia Biologica (Krakow) 62: 277–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3409/fb62_3.277

Sun Y, Liu Z , Ren L , Wei Z, Wang P, Li N and Zhao Y. 2012. Immunoglobulin genes and diversity: What we have learned from domestic animals. Journal of Animal Science Biotechnology 3: 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-3-18

Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Stepankova R, Hudcovic T, Tuckova L, Cukrowska B, Lodinova-Zadnikova R, Kozakova H, Rossmann P, Bartova J, Sokol D, Funda D P, Borovska D, Rehakova Z, Sinkora J, Hofman J, Drastich P and Kokesova A. 2000. Commensal bacteria (normal microflora), mucosal immunity and chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Immunology Letter 93: 97–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2004.02.005

Trabelsi I, Ktari N, Ben Slima S, Bouchaala K and Ben Salah R. 2016. Effects of supplementation with L. plantarum TN8 encapsulated in alginate-chitosan in broiler chickens. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 89: 677– 81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.05.044

Van den Abbeele P, Grootaert C, Possemiers S, Verstraete W, Verbeken K and Van de Wiele T. 2009. In vitro model to study the modulation of the mucin-adhered bacterial community. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 83: 349–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-1947-2

Downloads

Submitted

2019-09-20

Published

2019-09-20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

CAO, L., WU, X.-H., WANG, X.-Y., & LI, G.-G. (2019). Comparative evaluation of Lactobacillus strains with different adhesion ability on growth performance and immunomodulatory activity in broiler chickens. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 89(9), 997–1001. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i9.93781
Citation