Effectiveness of poultry based Farmers' Producer Organization and its impact on livelihood enhancement of rural women


Abstract views: 251 / PDF downloads: 161

Authors

  • ANIRBAN MUKHERJEE Scientist, ICAR– Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012 India
  • PREMLATA SINGH Head, ICAR– Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012 India
  • SHANTANU RAKSHIT PhD Scholar, ICAR– Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012 India
  • SATYA PRIYA Principal Scientist, ICAR– Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012 India
  • RAJARSHI ROY BURMAN Principal Scientist, ICAR– Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110 012 India
  • KUMARI SHUBHA Scientist, Division of Socio–Economic and Extension, ICAR–RCER, Patna
  • KANCHAN SINHA Scientist, ICAR–IASRI
  • VINAYAK NIKAM Scientist, ICAR–NIAP, New Delhi

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i10.95024

Keywords:

Agri–business, Income enhancement, Poultry, Producer Company, Women empowerment

Abstract

Farmers Producer Company (FPC) has emerged as a new business model for the rural area. Like agriculture and horticulture, it is working in poultry sector too. With an intuition to find out the impact of poultry based Farmer Producer Company on upliftment of rural people, the present study was conducted by selecting Madhya Pradesh Women Poultry Producer Company Pvt. Limited (MPWPCL) founded by a team of poor rural women. An Ex-Post Facto research design was used. Difference in difference technique was utilized to estimate the actual impact of FPCs. To measure the effectiveness of MPWPCL and its impact, two indices, viz. effectiveness index and livelihood wellbeing index were prepared. Study was conducted in Orchha district of Madhya Pradesh from 37 randomly selected poultry growers' members and 15 nonmember respondents from the same locale. The MPWPCL was found highly effective with overall effectiveness score of 71.88. Joining the FPC has improved the poor rural women's human, social and political dimensions of livelihood empowerment in addition to a significant economic gain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abadi T G. 2010. ‘Impact of agricultural marketing cooperative societies in empowering and enhancing rural livelihood in India’. PhD Thesis. Division of Agricultural Extension, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.

Abbas A and Zeeshan M. 2018. Hurdles faced by small scale poultry industry. The Explorer Islamabad: Journal of Social Sciences 1(9): 328–32.

Akanni I A. 2007. Effect of micro–finance on small scale poultry business in South Western Nigeria. Emirate Journal of Food and Agriculture 19(2): 38–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.v12i1.5174

Alagh Y K. 2007. On Producer Companies. PRADHAN’S Workshop on Producer Companies.

ASA. 2009. Manual for producer companies–Volume–I and II. Action for social advancement (ASA). Prepared for District Poverty Initiatives Programme (DPIP), Madhya Pradesh.

Blokland K and Goue¨T C. 2007. Farmers’ peer–to–peer support path to economic development, pp. 71–88. Producer

Organizations and Market Chains. Facilitating Trajectories of Change in Developing Countries. (Eds) Ton G, Bijman J and Oorthuizen J. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen.

Chauhan S. 2015. Producer companies in Madhya Pradesh: An evaluative study. International Journal of Recent Research Aspects 2(3): 66–77.

Edward A L. 1957. Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction. Vakils, Feffer and Simons Inc, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/14423-000

Farrell D. 2013. The role of poultry in human nutrition. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Poultry Development Review. p 2.

ICRA. 2017. Indian Poultry Industry: Poultry industry profitability expected to improve sharply in FY2017 majorly benefitting from lower soymeal prices. Available at https://www.icraresearch.in/research/ViewResearchReport/1177 accessed on 28th December 2018.

Moreki J C. 2011. Challenges in small-scale broiler production in Botswana. Journal of Agricultural Technology 7(6): 1579– 87.

Mukherjee A, Bahal R, Burman R R, Dubey S K and Jha G K. 2011. Effectiveness of Tata Kisan Sansar in technology advisory and delivery services in Uttar Pradesh. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education 11(3): 8–13.

Mukherjee A, Mondal T, Bisht J K and Pattanayak A. 2018c. Farmers’ preference of fodder trees in mid hills of Uttarakhand: a comprehensive ranking using analytical hierarchy process. Range Management and Agroforestry 39(1): 115–20.

Mukherjee A, Singh P, Ray M, Satyapriya and Burman R R. 2018b. Enhancing farmers income through farmers’ producers companies in India: Status and roadmap. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(8): 1151–61.

Mukherjee A, Singh P, Satyapriya and Burman R R. 2018a. Road map and strategies for effective viable profit making farmer producer companies. ICAR News, January–March, 16–18.

Nikam V R. 2013. ‘Linking farmers to export market: A case of mahagrapes in India’. PhD Thesis, Division of Agricultural Extension, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi.

Ramaswami B, Birthal P S and Joshi P K. 2005. Efficiency and distribution in Contract Farming: The case of Indian poultry growers, Discussion papers: Economics 05–01, Indian Statistical Institute, New Delhi, India.

Saaty T L. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal Services Sciences 1: 83–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

Singh S. 2008. Producer companies as new generation cooperatives. Economic and Political Weekly pp. 22–24.

Thamizhselvi R K and Rao S V N. 2010. Is contract broiler farming exploitative to small farmers? Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 80(12): 1243–50.

Downloads

Submitted

2019-11-01

Published

2019-11-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MUKHERJEE, A., SINGH, P., RAKSHIT, S., PRIYA, S., BURMAN, R. R., SHUBHA, K., SINHA, K., & NIKAM, V. (2019). Effectiveness of poultry based Farmers’ Producer Organization and its impact on livelihood enhancement of rural women. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 89(10), 1152–1160. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i10.95024
Citation