Differential expression of uncoupling protein gene in feed efficient cattle


Abstract views: 128 / PDF downloads: 84

Authors

  • AMITAVA DEY Principal Scientist, ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar 800 014 India
  • SHANKER DAYAL Senior Scientist, ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar 800 014 India
  • NEERAJ KUMAR Senior Research Fellow, ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar 800 014 India
  • RAMESH TIWARI Assistant Professor, ICAR Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, Bihar 800 014 India
  • NAZRUL HAQUE Principal Scientist, National Research Center on Mithun, Jharnapani, Nagaland
  • PURUSHOTTAM KAUSHIK Assistant Professor, Bihar Veterinary College, Patna.

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i11.95874

Keywords:

Expression, Feed efficiency, Mitochondria, Residual feed intake, Uncoupling protein

Abstract

Uncoupling proteins (UCP) are carrier proteins that release protons during respiration dissipitating energy in the form of heat. Expression of these genes plays an important role in feed efficiency through regulation of energy balance. Therefore present study was undertaken to study the differential expression of UCP2 and UCP3 gene in feed efficient cattle in comparison to low feed efficient animal. HFX Sahiwal male calves of same age group were selected randomly and divided in to two groups (feed efficient and less feed efficient) on the basis of residual feed intake (RFI) for the experiment. Differential expression analysis of UCP2 and UCP3 revealed significant upregulation of UCP2 gene in calves having less feed efficiency where as UCP3 gene was having non significant effect on residual feed intake.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andrews Z B, Liu Z W, Walllingford N, Erion D M, Borok E, Friedman J M, Tschöp M H, Shanabrough M, Cline G, Shulman G I, Coppola A, Gao X B, Horvath T L and Diano S. 2008. UCP2 mediates ghrelin’s action on NPY/AgRP neurons by lowering free radicals. Nature 454 846–51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07181

Bottje W, Pumford N R, Dirain C O, Iqbal M and Lassiter K. 2006. Feed efficiency and mitochondrial function. Poultry Science 85 8–14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.1.8

Bottje W, Tang Z X, Iqbal M, Cawthon D, Okimoto R, Wing T and Cooper M. 2002. Association of mitochondrial function with feed efficiency within a single genetic line of male broilers. Poultry Science 81 546–55 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.4.546

Dridi S, Onagbesan O, Swennen Q, Buyse J, Decuypere E and Taouis M. 2004. Gene expression, tissue distribution and potential physiological role of uncoupling protein in avian species. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part-A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology 139 273–83 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2004.09.010

Fonseca L F S, Gimenez D F J, Mercadante M E Z, Mercadante S F M, Ferro J A, Baldi F, De Souza F R P and Albuquerque L G. 2015. Expression of genes related to mitochondrial function in Nellore cattle divergently ranked on residual feed intake. Molecular Biology and Reproduction 42 559–65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-014-3801-6

Horvath T L, Bechmann I, Naftolin F, Kalra S P and Leranth C. 1997. Heterogeneity in the neuropeptide Y-containing neurons of the rat arcuate nucleus: GABAergic and non-GABAergic subpopulations. Brain Research 756 283–86 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(97)00184-4

Kelly A K, Waters S M, McGee M, Fonseca R G, Carberry C and Kenny D A. 2011. mRNA expression of genes regulating oxidative phosphorylation in the muscle of beef cattle divergently ranked on residual feed intake. Physiol Genomics 43: 12–23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/physiolgenomics.00213.2009

Kolath W H, Kerley M S, Golden J W and Keisler D H. 2006. The relationship between mitochondrial function and residual feed intake in Angus steers. Journal of Animal Science 84 861–65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.844861x

Leonard J V and Schapira A H V. 2000. Mitochondrial respiratory chain disorders I: Mitochondrial DNA defects. Lancet 355 299–304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)05225-3

Livak K J and Schmittgen T D. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2- delta delta C(T) method. Methods 25 402–08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262

NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle Seventh revised edition. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC, USA.

Xiao X Q, Grove K, Grayson L B E and Smith M S. 2004. Inhibition of uncoupling protein expression during lactation: Role of leptin. Endocrinology 145 830–38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2003-0836

Zulkifli N A, Naik M, Pitchford W S and Bottema C D K. 2007. Cattle residual feed intake candidate genes. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 18: 668–71.

Ojano-Dirain C, Toyomizu M, Wing T, Cooper M and Bottje W G. 2007. Gene expression in breast muscle and duodenum from low and high feed efficient broilers. Poultry Science 86: 372–81 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.2.372

Downloads

Submitted

2019-12-04

Published

2019-12-04

Issue

Section

Short-Communication

How to Cite

DEY, A., DAYAL, S., KUMAR, N., TIWARI, R., HAQUE, N., & KAUSHIK, P. (2019). Differential expression of uncoupling protein gene in feed efficient cattle. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 89(11), 1228–1230. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v89i11.95874
Citation