Type of whelping and its infleunce on Apgar score


92 / 20

Authors

  • Arunmozhi Associate Professor, Department of Veterinary Clinical Complex, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Orathanadu, Thanjavur - 614 625.
  • A. Subramani Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, District Livestock Farm, Hosur
  • P. Sridevi Professor (Retired), Department of Veterinary Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Madras Veterinary College, TANUVAS, Chennai – 600 007
  • M. Shafiuzama Professor, Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai - 600 007
  • Cecilia Joseph Director of Research, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai -51
  • K. Krishnakumar Professor and Head, Department of Veterinary Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai – 600 007

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijvasr.v49i2.126842

Keywords:

Apgarscoringsystem, Canine, Dystocia, Puppies, Mortality

Abstract

The modified Apgar score for puppies was evolved based on the reference range of heart rate, respiration, irritability reflex, motility and membrane mucous colour according to the physiology of canine neonate. A total of 100 puppies born to the bitches that underwent Spontaneous Whelping (SW), Assisted Whelping (AW) and Caesarean section (CS) were selected and were divided into III groups viz. SW (n=30), AW (n=35) and CS (n=35).A modified Apgar score model was used to assess neonatal viability of the puppies. Among the total 100 pups evaluated 36, 13 and 51 pups were having Apgar scores of 0 to 4, 5 to 9 and 10 to 14, respectively. Out of 36 pups having Apgar scores of 0 to 4 at birth, 5.56, 19.44 and 75.00 per cent of pups were born through SW, AW and CS, respectively. Among 13 pups born with Apgar scores of 5 to 9 at birth, 0, 38.46 and 61.54 per cent of pups were born through SW, AW and CS, respectively. Out of 51 pups with Apgar scores of 10 to 14 at birth, 54.90, 45.10 and 0 per cent of pups were born through SW, AW and CS, respectively. Among the viable pups at birth, the pups born through CS were having low and medium Apgar scores of 0 to 4 and 5 to 9, respectively. All the pups delivered through SW had highest Apgar scores at birth while the pups delivered through AW had shown Apgar scores between 5 to 9 and 10 to 14.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bharathidasan, M., George, R.S., Shafiuzama,M., Kannan, T.A and Ramesh, S. (2016). Modified Apgar score system for prediction of neonatal survival puppies delivered through cesarean section. International Journal of Developmental Research, 6(11):10281- 10284.

Davidson, A.P. (2014). Neonatal resuscitation – improving the outcome. Veterinary Medicine, Small Animal Clinician, 44:191-204.

Groppetti, D., Pecile, A., Del Carro, A.P., Copley, K., Minero, M and Cremonesi, F. (2010). Evaluation of newborn canine viability by means of umbilical vein lactate measurement, Apgar score and uterine tocodynamometry. Theriogenology, 74 (7): 1187-1196.

Jayakumar, C., Krishnaswamy, A., Sudha and Gand Honnappa, T.G. (2015). Assessment of canine neonate by Apgar scoring system and its value as an index of short term neonatal survival. Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction, 36 (2):14-20.

Lucio, C. F., Silva, L.C.G., Rodrigues, J.A., Veiga, G.A.L and Vannucchi, C. I. (2009). Acid-base changes in canine neonates following normal birth or dystocia. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 44(2):208–210.

Mosier, J.E. (1986). Small animal reproduction and infertility. A clinical approach to diagnosis and treatment. Ed. T.J. Burke, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia. Pp. 335-345.

Veronesi, M.C., Panzani, S., Faustini, M and Rota, A. (2009). An Apgar scoring system for routine assessment of newborn puppy viability and short-term survival prognosis. Theriogenology, 72(3):401-407.

Downloads

Submitted

11-08-2022

Published

03-11-2025

Issue

Section

Full Length Articles

How to Cite

N, A., A. Subramani, P. Sridevi, M. Shafiuzama, Cecilia Joseph, & K. Krishnakumar. (2025). Type of whelping and its infleunce on Apgar score. Indian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Research, 49(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.56093/ijvasr.v49i2.126842
Citation