EVALUATION OF QUALITY OF RAW FEED INGREDIENTS FOR ANIMAL FEED PRODUCTION

Authors

  • K. Ayyappan Assistant Professor, Department of Animal Nutrition, Veterinary College and Research Institute, TANUVAS, Orathanadu, Thanjavur
  • R. Suresh Assistant Professor, Department of Animal Nutrition, Veterinary College and Research Institute, TANUVAS, Orathanadu, Thanjavur
  • M. Palanivel Assistant Professor, Department of Animal Nutrition, Veterinary College and Research Institute, TANUVAS, Orathanadu, Thanjavur
  • M. Ramachandran Professor and Head, Department of Animal Nutrition, Veterinary College and Research Institute, TANUVAS, Orathanadu, Thanjavur

Keywords:

Feed ingredients, raw materials, quality control, chemical evaluation

Abstract

Samples of feed ingredients were collected from the truck loads that arrived at feed processing unit located in Veterinary College and Research Institute, Orathanadu, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu, India. Physical examination of collected samples was carried out prior to their chemical evaluation. Chemical evaluation of feed samples revealed that moisture content in maize grain ranged from 8.47% to 17.25% and high moisture was observed in samples received during the monsoon season (September to December). The crude protein content of protein supplements viz., soyabean meal, coconut oil cake, coconut deoiled cake (DOC), groundnut cake, groundnut deoiled cake, delinted decorticated cotton seed cake, sunflower deoiled cake and gingelly oil cake were 45.49, 25.11, 24.47, 36.92, 43.89, 35.36, 30.21 and 29.89 per cent on dry matter basis, respectively. The crude protein (% DMB) and crude fiber (% DMB) content of deoiled rice bran, rice bran and wheat bran were 15.47 and 16.13, 7.55 and 36.26, 14.26 and 9.47, respectively. Due to the high moisture content in maize grain 8.77% of the total truck loads of this ingredient received at the processing unit were rejected. Similarly, of the total truck loads of oil cakes received at the processing unit 20.93 % of soyabean meal, 12.5% of coconut oil cake, 20 % of coconut DOC, 22.22% of cotton seed cake and 33.33% of gingelly oil cake were rejected due to the lower crude protein and higher crude fiber contents. All truck loads of rice bran (100 %) were rejected due to their lower crude protein, higher crude fiber and Acid Insoluble Ash (AIA) content. The study thus revealed that quality control measures are essential to check the entry of poor quality raw materials before processing the feed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alagawany, M., Farag, M.R., Abd El-Hack, M.E. and Dhama, K. (2015). The practical application of sunflower meal in poultry nutrition. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 3: 634-648.

Ansari, M. A., Prakash, N., Punitha, P. and Baishya, L.K. (2015). Post-harvest management and value addition of groundnut. Join Director, ICAR Research Complex NEH Region, Manipur Centre, Lamphelpat, Imphal, India.

AOAC (2005). Official method of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 18th Edition, Washington, D.C, USA.

BIS, (2009). Bureau of Indian Standards, Manak Bhavan, 9 Bahadur Shah Zafar Marg, New Delhi.

Bodie, A.R., Micciche, A.C., Atungulu, G.G., Rothrock Jr, M.J. and Ricke, S.C. (2019). Current trends of rice milling byproducts for agricultural applications and alternative food production systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3: 47-60.

Carr, R.A. (1997). Oil Seeds Processing. Technology and solvents for extracting oilseeds and nonpetroleum oils. pp. 101-105.

Khan, L.M. and Hanna, M.A. (1983). Expression of oil from oilseeds—a review. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 28: 495-503.

Kumar, D., Datt, C., Das, L.K. and Kundu, S.S. (2015). Evaluation of various feedstuffs of ruminants in terms of chemical composition and metabolisable energy content. Veterinary World, 8: 605-609.

Livestock Census - 20 th (2019). Ministry of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.

Rama Rao, S.V., Raju, M.V.L.N., Panda, A.K. and Reddy, M.R. (2006). Sunflower seed meal as a substitute for soybean meal in commercial broiler chicken diets. British Poultry Science, 47: 592-598.

Ravikesavan, R., Nallathambi, G., Sivamurugan, A.P., Kumari, N., Vinothana, P., Renukadevi, S., Manimegalai, Thukkaiyanan, P., Sethuraman, K.

and Radha Jeyalakshmi, R. (2017). Maize research and development in Tamil Nadu, Maize research in India: Retrospect and prospect. ICAR-Indian Institute of Maize Research, PAU campus, Ludhiana, India, pp. 249-266.

Ravindran, V. and Blair, R. (1992). Feed resources for poultry production in Asia and the Pacific. II. Plant protein sources. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 48: 205–231.

Regar, M. N., Tulung, B., Londok, J. J. M. R., Moningkey, S. A. E. and Tulung, Y. R. L. (2019). Blood lipid profile of broiler chicken as affected by a combination of Feed restriction and different crude fiber sources. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 387:53-95.

Sahdev, R.K. (2015). Present status of peanuts and progression in its processing and preservation techniques. Agricultural Engineering International, 17: 309-327.

Sharif, M., Butt, M.S., Anjum, F.M. and Khan, S.H. (2014). Rice bran: a novel functional ingredient. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 54: 807–816.

Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1989). Statistical Methods. 8th Edn, Iowa State University Press, Ames, USA.

Waliyar, F., Reddy, S.V., Subramaniam, K., Reddy, T.Y., Devi, K.R., Craufurd, P.Q. and Wheeler, T.R. (2003). Importance of mycotoxins in food and feed in India. Aspects of Applied Biology, 68: 147-154.

Wang, T. and Johnson, L.A. (2001). Survey of soybean oil and meal qualities produced by different processes. Journal of American Oil Chemistry Society, 78: 311–318.

Yasothai, R., Mohan, B. and Ravi, R. (2010). Effect of feeding sesame oil cake (Sesamum indicum L.) by replacing protein concentrate mixture on the performance of broilers. Animal Nutrition and Feed Technology, 10: 207-218.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2023

Issue

Section

Full Length Articles

How to Cite

K. Ayyappan, R. Suresh, M. Palanivel, & M. Ramachandran. (2023). EVALUATION OF QUALITY OF RAW FEED INGREDIENTS FOR ANIMAL FEED PRODUCTION . Indian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Research, 52(2), 47-55. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/IJVASR/article/view/137795