QUALITY AND SHELF LIFE OF VALUE ADDED CARABEEF LOAVES AT REFRIGERATED TEMPERATURE

R. Narendra Babu; C. Vasanthi; K. Dushyanthan; S. Ezhilvelan; M. Muthulakshmi

doi:10.56093/ijvasr.v53i6.164945

Authors

R. Narendra Babu Registrar, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai - 51
C. Vasanthi Assistant Professor, Department of Livestock Products Technology (Meat Science), Madras Veterinary College, TANUVAS, Chennai
K. Dushyanthan Professor (Retd.), Dept. of Livestock Products Technology, Madras Veterinary College, Chennai - 7
S. Ezhilvelan Assistant Professor, Department of Livestock Products Technology (Meat Science), Madras Veterinary College, TANUVAS, Chennai
M. Muthulakshmi Assistant Professor, Department of Livestock Products Technology (Meat Science), VC&RI, Namakkal

https://doi.org/10.56093/ijvasr.v53i6.164945

Keywords:

Value addition, Carabeef loaves, physico-chemical, microbial, organoleptic

Abstract

Value added carabeef loaves were developed with variety meat, offals and non-meat extenders (refined wheat flour-T1 and soya flour-T2) while control loaves were prepared with skeletal meat and refined wheat flour. The loaves were packed aerobically in sterile Pet/Poly packages and subjected to physic-chemical quality, microbial profile and sensory quality analysis. Incorporation of low value meat and offals did not affect the physico-chemical characteristics of the loaves as reflected by the statistical similarity between control and treatment loaves. This is further confirmed by the improved organoleptic acceptability of the treatment loaves over the control loaves. The results of total viable count and yeast and mold count reveal shelf stability of loaves for 14 days. The acceptability of T1 and T2 carabeef loaves over the control loaves concludes that low value meat and offals can be incorporated @ 25% replacement of skeletal meat and soya flour can be used as a binder in the development of value added carabeef loaves which can be stored safely up to 14 days at 4±1 °C under aerobic packaging

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, S., Javed A Rizawi., Khan, M.S. and Srivastava, P.K. (2012). Effect of by-product incorporation on physic- chemical and microbiological quality and shelf life of buffalo meat fermented sausage. Journal of Food Process Technology, 3: 195-198.

Ahmad, S. and Srivastava, P.K. (2007). Quality and shelf life evaluation of fermented sausages of buffalo meat with different levels of heart and fat. Meat Science, 75: 603-609.

APHA (American Public Health Association), (1984). Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. M. L. Speck, ed. American Public Health Association, Washington D.C.

Babu, R.N.,Venkataramanujam, V. and Shanmugam A.M. (2002). Effect of modified atmosphere packaging on fresh buffalo meat quality. Buffalo Journal, 2: 171-182.

Bouton, P.E., Harris, P.V. and Shorthose W.R.F. (1971). Effect of ultimate pH upon water holding capacity and tenderness of mutton. Journal of Food Science, 36: 435-439.

Devatkal, S., Mendiratta, S.K. and Kondaiah, N. (2004). Quality characteristics of loaves from buffalo meat liver and vegetables. Meat Science, 67(3):377 -383.

Dushyanthan, K., Narendra Babu, R., Vasanthi, C. and Venkataramnujam, V. (2008). Processing of buffalo meat nuggets utilizing different binders. Tamil Nadu Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 4(2):77-83.

Kalaikannan, A., Anjaneyulu, A.S.R. and Santhi, D. (2007). Effect of egg proteins on the quality and refrigerated storage life of chicken patties made with broiler-spent hen meat and by-products. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 42:579-586.

Kondaiah, N. (2004). Value added meat products and development of processed meat sector. Natural Product Radiance, 3(4): 281-283.

Konwar, D. and Hazarika, M. (2003). Quality characteristic of pork sausage incorporated with swine by products. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 40(4):413 415.

Modi, V.K., Mahendrakar, N.S., Narasimha Rao, D. and Sachindra, N.M. (2003). Quality of buffalo meat burger containing legume flours as binders. Meat Science, 66: 143-149.

Muthulakshmi, M., Dushyanthan K., Venkataramanujam, V. and Vasanthi, C. (2009). Physico-chemical and microbiological qualities of buffalo meat sausages incorporating offal meat under different packaging methods during storage at 4°C. Journal of Meat Science, 6(1):46-53.

Rajkumar, V., Agnihotri, M.K. and Sharma N. (2004). Quality and shelf-life of vacuum and aerobic packed chevon patties under refrigeration temperature. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 17:548-553.

Rao, KH., Anjaneyulu, A.S.R.., Singh, R.R.B., Dubey, P.C. and Yadav, P.L. (1999). Effect of LW protein concentrate on the quality of smoked chicken sausages from broiler spent hens. Indian Journal Animal Science, 69: 441-444.

Sachindra, N.M., Sakhare, P.Z., Yashoda, K.P. and Narasimha, Rao. (2005). Microbial profile of buffalo sausage during processing and storage. Food Control, 10:31-35.

Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1994). Statistical methods. The Iowa state university press, Iowa.

Strange, E.D., Benedict, R.C., Smith, J.L. and Swift, C.E. (1977). Evaluation of rapid tests for monitoring alterations in meat quality during storage. 1. Intact meat. Journal of Food Protection, 40: 843.

Suman, S.P. and Sharma B.D. (2003). Effect of grind size and fat levels on the physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of low-fat ground buffalo meat patties. Meat Science, 65: 973-976.

Thomas, R., Anjaneyulu, A.S.R. and Kondaiah, N. (2006). Quality and shelf life evaluation of emulsion and restructured buffalo meat nuggets at cold storage (4±1°C). Meat Science, 72:373-379.