USE OF GEOSPATIAL TOOLS TO IDENTIFY SOIL RELATED CONSTRAINTS IN MANGO GROWING SOILS OF THE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
253 / 75
Keywords:
Geospatial Tools, GIS, GPS, Mango, Soil fertility maps, YSR Kadapa DistrictAbstract
Using a GPS-based survey, the detailed soil fertility status of mango-growing soils in twelve
mandals of the YSR Kadapa district (Andhra Pradesh) was explored in 2019-20 to discover soilrelated
crop production restrictions. pH, EC, OC, and accessible N, P, and K were measured in georeferenced
composite surface(0-30cm) soil samples. In terms of response, almost all soils were neutral
to mildly alkaline. The electrical conductivity (EC) of the soil was within acceptable limits for crops
(0.48 dSm-1). The average content of soil organic carbon was 4.2 g kg-1, with a range of 1.3 to 7.2 g
kg-1. The accessible soil nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium were found to be 229.65, 21.28, and
264.11 kg ha-1, respectively. Using the ArcGIS programme, thematic soil fertility maps were created
for each soil parameter to provide ready-to-understand information about soil fertility status and act
as a decision-making tool for effective mango production.
References
1. Awanish, K., Mishra, V.N., Srivastava, L.K and
2. Rakesh, B. 2014.Evaluations of soil fertility
3. status of available major nutrients (N,Pand
4. K) and micro nutrients (Fe, Mn, Cu and
5. Zn) in vertisol of Kabeerdham district of
6. Chhattisgarh, India. International Journal
7. of Inter-disciplinary and Multidisciplinary
8. Studies. 1(10): 72-79.
9. Chetna, K.L and Prasad, J. 2011. Characteristics
10. and classification of orange-growing soils
11. developed from different parent materials
12. in Nagpur district, Maharashtra. Journal of
13. the Indian Society of Soil Science.59 (3):
14. -217.
15. GoI.2015. Indian Horticulture Database of
16. National Horticulture Board -2015.
17. Retrieved from the website
18. (www.nhb.gov.in).
19. Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis.
20. Oxford IBH Publishing House, Bombay. pp.
21. -40.
22. Joshi, N.S., Vaidya, K.P and Pawar, C.D. 2015.
23. Assessment of physico-chemical
24. properties in soil from Mango orchards of
25. Ratnagiri district. International Journal of
26. Agricultural Science and Research
27. (IJASR). 5(2):131-136.
28. Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S and
29. Dean, L.A. 1954. Estimation of available
30. phosphorus in soils by extraction with
31. sodium bicarbonate. Circular 939, March 1954 Washington DC, USDepartment of
32. Agriculture. pp. 19-20.
33. Ranjha, A.M., Akram, M., Mehendi, S.M., Sadiq,
34. M., Sarfraz, M and Hasan, G. 2002.
35. Nutritional status of citrus in Sahiwal
36. district.Online Journal of Biological
37. Sciences.2(7): 453-458.
38. Subbiah, B.V and Asija, C.L. 1956. A rapid
39. procedure for the estimation ofavailable
40. nitrogen in soils.Current Science.25: 32.
41. Surwase, S.A., Kadu, P.R and Patil, D.S. 2016.
42. Soil micronutrient status and fruit quality
43. of orange orchards inKalmeshwar Tahsil,
44. District Nagpur (MS).Journal of Global
45. Biosciences. 5: 3523-3533.
46. Swati Sharma, MamjeetKaur and Verma, M.L.
47. Soil fertility and leaf nutrient status
48. of macronutrients in mangoorchards
49. under Kangra district of Himachal Pradesh.
50. International Journal of Chemical Studies.
51. (3):1317-1322.
52. Tarun Adak, Kailash Kumar and Vinod Kumar
53. Singh. 2019. Assessment of soil
54. micronutrients from a mango based
55. agroecology of Malihabad, Uttar Pradesh,
56. India. Tropical Plant Research. 6(2): 176–
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.