OPTIMISATION OF PROTEIN ENRICHED JACKFRUIT SEED FLOUR BASED NUTRI SPREADS
495 / 484
Authors
-
K. RAMMYA MOLU, E. R. ANEENA,SEEJA THOMACHAN PANJIKKARAN, C. L. SHARON and AMITHA ELIAS
Department of Community Science, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara - 680 656
Keywords:
Jackfruit seed flour, nutri spreads, protein source, skimmed milk powderAbstract
The jackfruit seed flour basednutri spreads were enriched by skimmed milk powder (SMP) in
the study conducted from 2016 to 2018.These protein sources were incorporated to the jackfruit
seed flour based nutri spreadin varying percentage levels (10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 50%).
Organoleptic and nutritional quality evaluation of prepared enriched jackfruit seed flour based nutri
spreads were done. All nutri spreads obtained high scores for organoleptic qualities.The best treatment
was selected through sensory evaluation using a score card with a nine point hedonic scale. Based
on organoleptic evaluation, nutri spread prepared with 70 per centjack fruit seed flour and 30 percent
skimmed milk powder had amaximum mean score of 8.66 for overall acceptability. The selected enriched
nutri spread was subjected to physico-chemical analysis and was observed to have moisture (3.64%),
energy (421 Kcal), carbohydrate (18.56 g 100 g-1), protein (14.34 g 100 g-1), fat (30.42 g 100 g-1),
calcium (136mg 100 g-1), iron (0.97 mg 100 g-1), sodium (5.97 mg 100 g-1) and potassium (27.45 mg
100 g-1). Highly acceptable, nutritionally superior and shelf stable nutri spreads could be developed
successfully based on jackfruit seed flour without adding any preservatives.
References
1. Abraham,A and Jayamuthunagai,J. 2014.
2. Ananalytical study on jackfruit seed flour
3. and its incorporation in pasta. Research
4. Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and
5. Chemical Sciences. 5 (2): 1597-1610.
6. Islam, M. S., Begum, R., Khatun, M and Deyl, K.
7. C. 2015. A study on nutritional and
8. functional properties analysis of jackfruit
9. seed flour and value addition to biscuits.
10. International Journal of Engineering
11. Research and Technology. 4(12): 139-
12. Jellinek, G. 1985. Sensory Evaluation of Food:
13. Theory and Practice. Ellis Horwood,
14. Chichester, England.pp. 590-596.
15. Loncarevic, I., Pajin, B., Dokic, L., Seres, Z.,
16. Fister, A., Simovic, D. S and Krstonosic, V.
17. Rheological and textural properties
18. of cocoa spread cream with sunflower
19. lecithin. Acta Tehnica Corviniensis –
20. Bulletin of Engineering. 7: 47-50.
21. Pandeay, S. 2004. Value added products and
22. byproducts from jackfruit. Ph. D. thesis
23. submitted to Kerala Agricultural University,
24. Vellayani, Kerala. pp.120-122.
25. Raljic, J. V. P., Petronijevic, J. G. L., Dimic, E. B.,
26. Popov, V. S., Vujasinovic, V. B., Blesic, I. V
27. and Portic, M. J. 2013. Quality parameters
28. of mixed milk and cocoa spreads.
29. HemijskaIndustrija.67 (5): 781-793.
30. Shakerardekani, A., Karim, R., Ghazali, H. M and
31. Chin, N.L. 2013. Textural, rheological and
32. sensory properties and oxidative stability
33. of nut spreads. International Journal of
34. Molecular Science. 14: 4223-4241.
35. Wilson, Iand David,J. 2017. Studies on quality
36. parameters of soya spread incorporated
37. with soy protein isolate. International
38. Journal of Chemical Studies.5 (3): 319-
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
