INFLUENCE OF PROCESS PARAMETERS ON CELLULASE PRODUCTION BY Trichoderma viride (MTCC 800) EMPLOYING SOLID STATE FERMENTATION
381 / 45
Authors
-
P. R. KAKDE and S. C. AITHAL *
Department of Microbiology, Dnyanopasak College, Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University (SRTMU), Nanded-431 606
Keywords:
Agricultural biomass, Biofuel, CMCase, FPase, Optimization.Abstract
In this study, the effect of physico-chemical parameters on the production of cellulase
from Trichoderma viride (MTCC 800) were examined using five different agricultural residues
namely banana peel, groundnut shell, corn cob, sugarcane bagasse, and pigeonpea stalk. The
process parameters examined were pretreatment method, supplementation media, initial media
pH, incubation period, temperature, and leaching agent. Among the parameters studied, maximum
cellulase production was obtained on all the substrates treated with 1 N H2SO4 supplemented with
Mandel’s medium of pH 5.5-6 after 6-8 days of incubation at 30-36°C and 0.05 M phosphate
buffer (pH 7.0) as a leaching agent.
References
1. Abatenh, E., Gizaw, B., Tsegaye, Z and Wassie,
2. M. 2017. Review article application of
3. microorganisms in bioremediationreview.
4. Journal of Environmental
5. Microbiology. 1 (1):2-9.
6. Batool, S., Khalid, A., Chowdury, A.J.K., Sarfraz,
7. M., Balkhair, K.S and Ashraf, M.A. 2015.
8. Impacts of azo dye on ammonium
9. oxidation process and ammonia oxidizing
10. soil bacteria. RSC Adv. 5, 34812-34820.
11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5RA03768A.
12. Darabzadeh, N., Hamidi-Esfahani, Z and Hejazi,
13. P. 2019. Optimization of cellulase
14. production under solid state fermentation
15. by a new mutant strain of Trichoderma
16. reesei. Food Science and Nutrition.
17. :572-578. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/
18. fsn3.852.
19. Dey, P and Roy, A. 2018. Molecular structure
20. and catalytic mechanism of fungal family
21. G acidophilic xylanases. 3 Biotech.
22. (2):78. doi: 10.1007/s13205-018-
23. -8.
24. Ge, Y and Li, L. 2018. System-level energy
25. consumption modeling and optimization
26. for cellulosic biofuel production, Applied
27. Energy. 226(C):935-946. doi: 10.1016/
28. j.apenergy.2018.06.020.
29. Ghazanfar, M., Irfan, M., Tabassum, F., Shakir,
30. H.A and Qazi, J.I. 2018. Effect of different
31. pretreatment conditions on cellulase
32. production by B. subtilis K-18 through
33. Box-Bhenken Design. Iranian Journal of
34. Science and Technology. 42(2):313–320.
35. doi:10.1007/s40995-017-0463-y.
36. Guerriero, G., Hausman, J.-F., Strauss, J.,
37. Ertan, H and Siddiqui, K.S. 2016.
38. Lignocellulosic biomass: Biosynthesis,
39. degradation, and industrial utilization.
40. Engineering in Life Sciences. 16:1-16.
41. doi:10.1002/elsc.201400196.
42. Kakde, P and Aithal, S. 2021. Evaluation of
43. various agricultural biomass for cellulase
44. production by Trichoderma spp. under
45. solid state fermentation (SSF). The
46. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences.
47. (3):49-58.
48. Kakde, P.R and Aithal, S.C. 2020. Effect of
49. Pretreatment on Agro-Residues for
50. Cellulase Production by Solid State
51. Fermentation Using Fungi. International
52. Journal of Recent Scientific Research. 11
53. (01):36903-36906. doi:10.24327/IJRSR.
54. Nathan, V. K., Esther Rani, M., Rathinasamy,
55. G., Dhiraviam, K. N and Jayavel, S. 2014.
56. Process optimization and production
57. kinetics for cellulase production by
58. Trichoderma viride VKF3. Springer
59. Plus. 3:92. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-
60. -3-92.
61. Nehad, E.A., Yoness, M.F and Reem, A.A.
62. Optimization and purification of
63. cellulase produced by P.decumbens and
64. its application. Egyptian Pharmaceutical
65. Journal. 18 (4): 391-402. 10.4103/
66. epj.epj_31_19.
67. Saini, A., Aggarwal, N.K and Yadav, A. 2017.
68. Cost-effective cellulase production using
69. Parthenium hysterophorus biomass as an
70. unconventional lignocellulosic substrate.
71. Biotech. 7 (1):12. doi:10.1007/s13205-
72. -0604-1.
73. Sindhu, R., Gnansounou, E., Rebello, S.,
74. Binod, P., Varjani, S., Thakur, I.S., Nair,
75. R.B and Pandey, A. 2019. Conversion of
76. food and kitchen waste to value-added
77. products. Journal of Environmental
78. Management. 241:619-630. doi:
79. 1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.053.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
