PROXIMATE AND PHYTOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS OF LEAVES OF MEDICINAL PLANT Murraya koenigii


392 / 298

Authors

  • RICHA DODIA* and SUSMITA SAHOO Natubhai V. Patel College of Pure and Applied Sciences, Charutar Vidya Mandal University, Vallabh Vidyanagar, Anand - 388 315

Keywords:

Curry leaves, Murraya koenigii, Phytochemical parameters, Proximate parameters.

Abstract

The purpose of this research work is to evaluate the proximate and phytochemical components
of Murraya koenigii leaves from Vadodara and Anand cities of Gujarat for their efficacy before
incorporation into the formulation. Murraya koenigii leaves were collected from June-July in the year
2021. Murraya koenigii leaves have been used to control diabetes. The leaves were evaluated by
determining physicochemical parameters including total ash, acid insoluble ash, water-soluble ash,
and moisture content. Phytochemical parameters included total phenolic content, total flavonoid
content, and total tannin content in terms of gallic acid, quercetin, rutin, and tannic acid equivalents,
respectively. The quantitative proximate investigation of Murraya koenigii plant leaves showed leaves
of Anand city have a total ash content 15.66±0.32% w/w, acid-insoluble ash 0.59±0.01% w/w, moisture
content 1.12±0.03% w/w respectively compared to Vadodara city total ash content 12.29±0.08% w/w,
acid-insoluble ash 0.20±0.02 %w/w, moisture content 1.31±0.12 %w/w, respectively. However, Anand
city leaves have a lower water-soluble capacity of 0.91±0.06% w/w compared to Vadodara city at
7.34±0.40% w/w. In this study, leaves of Vadodara city showed a high quantity of total phenolics, total
flavonoids, and total tannin phytoconstituents 101.50±0.92 mg of GAE/g, 163.83±0.87 mg of RT /g,
128.16±0.76 mg of TAE/g compared to Anand city 61.58±0.62 mg of GAE/g,126.66±1.04 mg of RT /
g, 64.16±1.44 mg of TAE/gconcerning gallic acid, rutin, and tannic acid. However, the leaves of
Anand city showed a high quantity of total flavonoids 101.16±1.28 mg of QE/g compared to Vadodara
city at 59.0±0.09 mg of QE/g concerning quercetin

References

1. Abubakar, A. R and Haque, M. 2020. Preparation

2. of medicinal plants: basic extraction and

3. fractionation procedures for experimental

4. purposes. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied

5. Sciences. 12(1):1-2. DoI:https://dx.doi.org/

6. 4103%2 Fjpbs. JPBS_175_19.

7. Adusei, S., Otchere, J. K., Oteng, P., Mensah,

8. R. Q and Tei-Mensah, E. 2019.

9. Phytochemical analysis, antioxidant and

10. metal chelating capacity of Tetrapleura

11. tetraptera. Heliyon. 5(11): e02762.

12. D o i : h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 /

13. j.heliyon.2019.e02762.

14. Ameh, S., Obodozie, O., Inyang, U., Abubakar,

15. M and Garba, M. 2010. Quality control

16. tests on Andrographis paniculata Nees

17. (Family: Acanthaceae)– an Indian

18. ‘wonder’plant grown in Nigeria. Tropical

19. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 9(4).

20. -394.Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/

21. tjpr.v9i4.58937.

22. Asema, S. U. K., Shaikh, A. A., Farooqui, M and

23. Fatema, S. 2021. Phytochemical analysis

24. of Murraya koenigii leaves extract and its

25. biological activity. The International Journal

26. of Analytical and Experimental Modal

27. Analysis. 3(1). 1798-1801.

28. Dahlia, I. A., Islam, M. B., Zaman, S., Islam, M.

29. A., Jalil, M. A., Ahmed, N. U.,Rahim, M.A.,

30. Mondol M.H., Muzahid A.A and Sarkar, M.

31. H. 2017. Investigation on phytochemical

32. and antioxidant activity of the plant

33. Murraya koenigii L. (Curry leaf) in

34. Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Journal of

35. Antioxidant Activity. 1(3):1-3. DoI:https://

36. doi.org/10.14302/ISSN.2471-2140.JAA-

37. -1728.

38. Devatkal, S. K., Thorat, P. R., Manjunatha, M and

39. Anurag, R. K. 2012. Comparative

40. antioxidant effect of aqueous extracts of

41. curry leaves, fenugreek leaves and

42. butylated hydroxytoluene in raw chicken

43. patties. Journal of Food Science and

44. Technology. 49(6): 781-785. DoI: 10.1007/

45. s13197-011-0511-0.

46. Eid, H and S Haddad, P. 2017. The antidiabetic

47. potential of quercetin: underlying

48. mechanisms. Current Medicinal Chemistry.

49. (4): 355-364. DoI: https://doi.org/

50. 2174/0929867323666160909153707.

51. Ghorbani, A. 2017. Mechanisms of antidiabetic

52. effects of flavonoid rutin. Biomedicine &

53. Pharmacotherapy. 96:305-312. Doi:https:/

54. /doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.001.

55. Grover, N., Meena, R and Patni, V. 2014.

56. Physiochemical evaluation, phytochemical

57. screening and chromato-graphic

58. fingerprint profile of Woodfordia fruticosa

59. (L.) Kurz extracts. International Journal of

60. Pharmaceutical Sciences and

61. Research. 5(7):2772-2773. Doi: http://

62. dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-

63. 5(7).2772-82.

64. Igara, C.E., Omoboyowa, D.A., Ahuchaogu, A.A.,

65. Orji, N.U and Ndukwe, M.K. 2016.

66. Phytochemical and nutritional profile of

67. Murraya koenigii (Linn) Spreng

68. leaf. Journal of Pharmacognosy and

69. Phytochemistry. 5(5): 7-8.

70. Jain, U. K and Dixit, V. K. 2004. Spectropho -

71. metrical estimation of tannins from the

72. Chyavanprash. Indian Drugs, Indian Drugs

73. Bombay. 41(8): 469-472. DoI:10.4103/

74. -474X.36949.

75. Kazi. 2014. Use of traditional plants in diabetes

76. mellitus. International Journal of

77. Pharmacy.4(4):283-289.

78. McDonald, S., Prenzler, P. D., Antolovich, M and

79. Robards, K. 2001. Phenolic content and

80. antioxidant activity of olive extracts. Food

81. Chemistry. 73(1):73-84. DoI: https://

82. doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00288-0.

83. Mukherjee, P.K . 2019. Quality control of herbal

84. drugs. Horizons Pharmaceutical

85. Publishers. pp. 186-93. URL: https://

86. www.elsevier.com/books/quality-controla

87. n d - e v a l u a t i o n - o f - h e r b a l - d r u g s /

88. mukherjee/978-0-12-813374-3.

89. Nouman, S. M., Shehzad, A., Butt, M. S., Khan,

90. M. I and Tanveer, M. 2015. Phytochemical

91. profiling of curry (Murraya koenijii) leaves

92. and its health benefits. Pakistan Journal

93. of Food Sciences. 25(4): 204-215.

94. Pandey, M. K., Singh, G. N., Sharma, R. K and

95. Lata, S. 2012. Standardization of

96. yakritplihantakchurna: An ayurvedic

97. polyherbal formulation. International

98. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and

99. Research. 3(1):171-172.

100. Phatak, R.S., Chitra C. K., Kailas D. D and Anup

101. S. H. 2018. Investigation of antioxidant and

102. antidiabetic activities of Murraya koenigii

103. leaves methanolic and aqueous extract by

104. in-vitro methods. International Journal of

105. Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences.

106. (4):1460-1464.

107. Sharma, S and Bhattacharya, A. 2017. Drinking

108. water contamination and treatment

109. techniques. Applied Water Science.

110. : 1043–1067. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/

111. s13201-016-0455-7.

112. Tachibana, Y., Kikuzaki, H., Lajis, N. H and

113. Nakatani, N. 2001. Antioxidative activity of

114. carbazoles from Murraya koenigii

115. leaves. Journal of Agricultural and Food

116. Chemistry. 49(11): 5589-5594. DoI:https:/

117. /doi.org/10.1021/jf010621r.

118. Wang, S. Y and Jiao, H. 2000. Scavenging

119. capacity of berry crops on superoxide

120. radicals, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl

121. radicals and singlet oxygen. Journal of

122. Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 48(11):

123. -5684. DoI:https://doi.org/10.1021/

124. jf000766i.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2022

How to Cite

RICHA DODIA* and SUSMITA SAHOO. (2022). PROXIMATE AND PHYTOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS OF LEAVES OF MEDICINAL PLANT Murraya koenigii. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 50(3), 61-68. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/TJRA/article/view/133374