PROXIMATE AND PHYTOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS OF LEAVES OF MEDICINAL PLANT Murraya koenigii
392 / 298
Keywords:
Curry leaves, Murraya koenigii, Phytochemical parameters, Proximate parameters.Abstract
The purpose of this research work is to evaluate the proximate and phytochemical components
of Murraya koenigii leaves from Vadodara and Anand cities of Gujarat for their efficacy before
incorporation into the formulation. Murraya koenigii leaves were collected from June-July in the year
2021. Murraya koenigii leaves have been used to control diabetes. The leaves were evaluated by
determining physicochemical parameters including total ash, acid insoluble ash, water-soluble ash,
and moisture content. Phytochemical parameters included total phenolic content, total flavonoid
content, and total tannin content in terms of gallic acid, quercetin, rutin, and tannic acid equivalents,
respectively. The quantitative proximate investigation of Murraya koenigii plant leaves showed leaves
of Anand city have a total ash content 15.66±0.32% w/w, acid-insoluble ash 0.59±0.01% w/w, moisture
content 1.12±0.03% w/w respectively compared to Vadodara city total ash content 12.29±0.08% w/w,
acid-insoluble ash 0.20±0.02 %w/w, moisture content 1.31±0.12 %w/w, respectively. However, Anand
city leaves have a lower water-soluble capacity of 0.91±0.06% w/w compared to Vadodara city at
7.34±0.40% w/w. In this study, leaves of Vadodara city showed a high quantity of total phenolics, total
flavonoids, and total tannin phytoconstituents 101.50±0.92 mg of GAE/g, 163.83±0.87 mg of RT /g,
128.16±0.76 mg of TAE/g compared to Anand city 61.58±0.62 mg of GAE/g,126.66±1.04 mg of RT /
g, 64.16±1.44 mg of TAE/gconcerning gallic acid, rutin, and tannic acid. However, the leaves of
Anand city showed a high quantity of total flavonoids 101.16±1.28 mg of QE/g compared to Vadodara
city at 59.0±0.09 mg of QE/g concerning quercetin
References
1. Abubakar, A. R and Haque, M. 2020. Preparation
2. of medicinal plants: basic extraction and
3. fractionation procedures for experimental
4. purposes. Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied
5. Sciences. 12(1):1-2. DoI:https://dx.doi.org/
6. 4103%2 Fjpbs. JPBS_175_19.
7. Adusei, S., Otchere, J. K., Oteng, P., Mensah,
8. R. Q and Tei-Mensah, E. 2019.
9. Phytochemical analysis, antioxidant and
10. metal chelating capacity of Tetrapleura
11. tetraptera. Heliyon. 5(11): e02762.
12. D o i : h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 /
13. j.heliyon.2019.e02762.
14. Ameh, S., Obodozie, O., Inyang, U., Abubakar,
15. M and Garba, M. 2010. Quality control
16. tests on Andrographis paniculata Nees
17. (Family: Acanthaceae)– an Indian
18. ‘wonder’plant grown in Nigeria. Tropical
19. Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 9(4).
20. -394.Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/
21. tjpr.v9i4.58937.
22. Asema, S. U. K., Shaikh, A. A., Farooqui, M and
23. Fatema, S. 2021. Phytochemical analysis
24. of Murraya koenigii leaves extract and its
25. biological activity. The International Journal
26. of Analytical and Experimental Modal
27. Analysis. 3(1). 1798-1801.
28. Dahlia, I. A., Islam, M. B., Zaman, S., Islam, M.
29. A., Jalil, M. A., Ahmed, N. U.,Rahim, M.A.,
30. Mondol M.H., Muzahid A.A and Sarkar, M.
31. H. 2017. Investigation on phytochemical
32. and antioxidant activity of the plant
33. Murraya koenigii L. (Curry leaf) in
34. Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Journal of
35. Antioxidant Activity. 1(3):1-3. DoI:https://
36. doi.org/10.14302/ISSN.2471-2140.JAA-
37. -1728.
38. Devatkal, S. K., Thorat, P. R., Manjunatha, M and
39. Anurag, R. K. 2012. Comparative
40. antioxidant effect of aqueous extracts of
41. curry leaves, fenugreek leaves and
42. butylated hydroxytoluene in raw chicken
43. patties. Journal of Food Science and
44. Technology. 49(6): 781-785. DoI: 10.1007/
45. s13197-011-0511-0.
46. Eid, H and S Haddad, P. 2017. The antidiabetic
47. potential of quercetin: underlying
48. mechanisms. Current Medicinal Chemistry.
49. (4): 355-364. DoI: https://doi.org/
50. 2174/0929867323666160909153707.
51. Ghorbani, A. 2017. Mechanisms of antidiabetic
52. effects of flavonoid rutin. Biomedicine &
53. Pharmacotherapy. 96:305-312. Doi:https:/
54. /doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.001.
55. Grover, N., Meena, R and Patni, V. 2014.
56. Physiochemical evaluation, phytochemical
57. screening and chromato-graphic
58. fingerprint profile of Woodfordia fruticosa
59. (L.) Kurz extracts. International Journal of
60. Pharmaceutical Sciences and
61. Research. 5(7):2772-2773. Doi: http://
62. dx.doi.org/10.13040/IJPSR.0975-
63. 5(7).2772-82.
64. Igara, C.E., Omoboyowa, D.A., Ahuchaogu, A.A.,
65. Orji, N.U and Ndukwe, M.K. 2016.
66. Phytochemical and nutritional profile of
67. Murraya koenigii (Linn) Spreng
68. leaf. Journal of Pharmacognosy and
69. Phytochemistry. 5(5): 7-8.
70. Jain, U. K and Dixit, V. K. 2004. Spectropho -
71. metrical estimation of tannins from the
72. Chyavanprash. Indian Drugs, Indian Drugs
73. Bombay. 41(8): 469-472. DoI:10.4103/
74. -474X.36949.
75. Kazi. 2014. Use of traditional plants in diabetes
76. mellitus. International Journal of
77. Pharmacy.4(4):283-289.
78. McDonald, S., Prenzler, P. D., Antolovich, M and
79. Robards, K. 2001. Phenolic content and
80. antioxidant activity of olive extracts. Food
81. Chemistry. 73(1):73-84. DoI: https://
82. doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00288-0.
83. Mukherjee, P.K . 2019. Quality control of herbal
84. drugs. Horizons Pharmaceutical
85. Publishers. pp. 186-93. URL: https://
86. www.elsevier.com/books/quality-controla
87. n d - e v a l u a t i o n - o f - h e r b a l - d r u g s /
88. mukherjee/978-0-12-813374-3.
89. Nouman, S. M., Shehzad, A., Butt, M. S., Khan,
90. M. I and Tanveer, M. 2015. Phytochemical
91. profiling of curry (Murraya koenijii) leaves
92. and its health benefits. Pakistan Journal
93. of Food Sciences. 25(4): 204-215.
94. Pandey, M. K., Singh, G. N., Sharma, R. K and
95. Lata, S. 2012. Standardization of
96. yakritplihantakchurna: An ayurvedic
97. polyherbal formulation. International
98. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and
99. Research. 3(1):171-172.
100. Phatak, R.S., Chitra C. K., Kailas D. D and Anup
101. S. H. 2018. Investigation of antioxidant and
102. antidiabetic activities of Murraya koenigii
103. leaves methanolic and aqueous extract by
104. in-vitro methods. International Journal of
105. Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences.
106. (4):1460-1464.
107. Sharma, S and Bhattacharya, A. 2017. Drinking
108. water contamination and treatment
109. techniques. Applied Water Science.
110. : 1043–1067. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/
111. s13201-016-0455-7.
112. Tachibana, Y., Kikuzaki, H., Lajis, N. H and
113. Nakatani, N. 2001. Antioxidative activity of
114. carbazoles from Murraya koenigii
115. leaves. Journal of Agricultural and Food
116. Chemistry. 49(11): 5589-5594. DoI:https:/
117. /doi.org/10.1021/jf010621r.
118. Wang, S. Y and Jiao, H. 2000. Scavenging
119. capacity of berry crops on superoxide
120. radicals, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl
121. radicals and singlet oxygen. Journal of
122. Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 48(11):
123. -5684. DoI:https://doi.org/10.1021/
124. jf000766i.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.