YIELD CONTRIBUTING TRAITS OF QUINOA (Chenopodium quinoa) GENOTYPES USING MULTIVARIATE STATISTICS
375 / 128
Keywords:
Chenopodium, Correlation, Genetic Variability, Principal Component AnalysisAbstract
The study was carried out during the rabi seasons of 2019 and 2020 to evaluate promising
genotypes of Chenopodium quinoa to compare the grain yield potential, variability and genetic
relationship between different component traits. Genotypic coefficient of variation, the highest value
was observed for seed yield (21.33) while lowest was observed for days to 50% flowering (1.45).
Heritability was for plant height (95.49) and maximum genetic gain was observed for seed yield (32.85).
High heritability coupled with high genetic advance was observed for seed yield, leaf width and seed
weight (g/10ml). Days to 50% flowering had significant positive correlation with leaf length, plant
height, days to maturity and seed weight (g/10ml) but a significant negative correlation with seed
yield. Number of branches per planthad a significant positive correlation with inflorescence length.
Step-wise regression indicated that days to 50% flowering, inflorescence length and seed weight (g/
10ml) play significant role in deciding seedyield in quinoa as predictor variables. A set of eight qualitative
traits could efficiently discriminate cultivars in PCA (explaining 70.90% of total variation), suggesting
that it can serve as a valuable breeding tool for the characterization.
References
1. Bhargava, A., Shukla, S., Katiyar, R.S and Ohri,
2. D. 2003. Selection parameters for genetic
3. improvement in Chenopodium grain yield
4. in sodic soil. Journal of Applied
5. Horticulture. 5(1): 45-48.
6. Dini, A., Rastrelli, L., Saturnino, P and Schettino
7. O. 1992. A compositional study of
8. Chenopodium quinoa seeds. Food/
9. Nahrung. 36(4): 400-404.
10. Giusti, L. 1970. El genero Chenopodiumen
11. Argentina 1: Numeros de cromosomas.
12. Darwiniana. 16: 98-105.
13. Hussain, M.I., Muscolo, A., Ahmed, M., Asghar
14. M.A and Al-Dakheel A.J. 2020. Agromorphological,
15. yield and quality traits and
16. interrelationship with yield stability in
17. quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
18. genotypes under saline marginal
19. environment. Plants. 9: 1-16.
20. Koziol, M.J. 1992. Chemical composition and
21. nutritional evaluation of quinoa
22. (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of
23. Food Composition Analysis. 5: 35-68.
24. Manjarres-Hernandez, E. H., Arias-Moreno, D.M.,
25. Morillo-Coronado, A.C., Ojeda-Perez Z.Z
26. and Cardenas-Chaparro, A. 2021.
27. Phenotypic characterization of quinoa
28. (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) for the
29. selection of promising materials for
30. breeding programs. Plants. 10: 1-16.
31. Miranda, M., Vega-Galvez, A., Martinez, E.,
32. Lopez, J., Rodriguez, M. J., Henriquez, K
33. and Fuentes F. 2012. Genetic diversity and
34. comparision of physicochemical and
35. nutritional characteristics of six quinoa
36. (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes
37. cultivated in Chile. Cienc. Tecnol. Aliment
38. Campinas. 32(4): 835-843.
39. Price, A.L., Patterson, N.J., Plenge, R.M and
40. Weinblatt, M.E. 2006. Principal component
41. analysis corrects for stratification in
42. genome-wide association studies. Nature
43. Genetics. 38(8): 904-909.
44. Yadav, S.K., Kaushik, S.K., Singh, M.C., Singh,
45. S.P., Khabiruddin, M., Raiger, H.L., Phogat,
46. B.S and Singh, K. 2017. Progress report
47. rabi 2016-17. All-India coordinated
48. research network on potential crops,
49. NBPGR, New Delhi. pp. 249-250.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.