IMPACT OF PRIMARY PROCESSING TECHNIQUES ON THE NUTRITIONAL VALUES OF COMMONLY CONSUMED CEREALS, LEGUMES AND OILSEEDS


385 / 208

Authors

  • MANISHA SHARMA* and S. KOWSALYA Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore-641 043

Keywords:

Cereals, Legumes, Nutritional values, Oilseeds and Processing techniques

Abstract

The objective of this research was to study the impact of processing techniques on the nutrient
composition of selected cereals, legumes and oilseeds.The experiment was carried out in the year
from January to June, 2021 at Nutrition research laboratory, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science
and Higher Education for Women, Coimbatore. The results revealed that the commonly consumed
cereals and legumes after primary processing had significant improvement in terms of nutrients.
Moisture content was found to be lowest in pumpkin seeds flour 0.31±0.10g/100g, available
carbohydrate was found to be highest in finger millet flour 74.03±0.05g/100g, crude protein was
found to be highest in soybean flour 34.06±0.10g/100g, crude fat was found to be highest in pumpkin
seeds flour 49.50±0.15g/100g, crude fibre was found to be highest in mung bean flour 6.05±0.06g/
100g.

References

1. A.O.A.C. 2000. Association of official analytical

2. chemists, official methods of analysis

3. association of official analytical chemist,

4. Washington, DC. pp.249.

5. Adelekan, A. O., Alamu, A. E., Arisa, N. U.,

6. Adebayo, Y. O and Dosa, A. S. 2013.

7. Nutritional, microbiological and sensory

8. characteristics of malted soy-kunuzaki: An

9. improved traditional beverage. Advances

10. in Microbiology. 4(3): 389-397.

11. Agume, A. S. N., Njintang, N. Y and Mbofung, C.

12. M. F. 2017. Effect of soaking and roasting

13. on the physicochemical and pasting

14. properties of soybean flour. Foods.

15. (2):12-18.

16. Animashaun, O. H.,Olorode, O. O., Sofunde, K.

17. S and Idowu, M. A. 2017. Quality evaluation

18. of pasta fortified with roasted sesame flour.

19. Journal of Environmental Science,

20. Toxicology and Food Technology. 5 (1): 29-

21. Chaudhary, N and Vyas, S. 2014. Effect of

22. germination on proximate composition and

23. antinutritional factor of millet (ragi) based

24. premixes. International Journalof Food

25. Nutritional Sciences. 3(4):71-77.

26. Egounlety, M and Aworh, O. C. 2003. Effect of

27. soaking, dehulling, cooking and

28. fermentation with Rhizopus oligosporus on

29. the oligosaccharides, trypsin inhibitor,

30. phytic acid and tannins of soybean

31. (Glycine max Merr.), cowpea (Vigna

32. unguiculata L. Walp) and groundbean

33. (Macrotyloma geocarpa Harms). Journal

34. of Food Engineering.56(2): 249–254.

35. Florence, S. P., Urooj, A., Asha, M. R and Rajiv,

36. J. 2014. Sensory, physical and nutritional

37. qualities of cookies prepared from pearl

38. millet (Pennisetum typhoideum). Journal of

39. Food Processing andTechnology. 5(10):

40. -5.

41. Ghavidel, R and Prakash, J. 2007. The impact of

42. germination and dehulling on nutrients,

43. antinutrients, in vitro iron and calcium

44. bioavailability and in vitro starch and

45. protein digestibility of some legume

46. seeds. LWT-Food Science and

47. Technology. 40 (3):1292-1299.

48. Gupta, A., Lampropulos, J.F., Bikdeli, B.,Mody,

49. P., Chen, R., Kulkarni, V.T and

50. Dharmarajan, K. 2013. Most important

51. outcomes research papers on

52. cardiovascular disease in women.

53. Circulation:Cardiovascular quality and

54. Outcomes. 6 (1): 1-7.

55. Hedge, J. E and Hofreiter, B. T. 1962. Estimation

56. of carbohydrate. In: Methods in

57. Carbohydrate Chemistry. Academic Press,

58. New York.pp. 17-22.

59. Hooda, S and Jood, S. 2003.Physico-chemical,

60. rheological and organoleptic

61. characteristics of wheat-fenugreek

62. supplemented blends. Molecular

63. Nutrition & Food Research. 47:265-268.

64. Jung, H., Lee, Y. J and Yoon, W. B. 2018. Effect

65. of moisture content on the grinding

66. process and powder properties in food:

67. areview. Processes. 6(6): 69-76.

68. Krishnan, R and Meera, M. S. 2018. Pearl millet

69. minerals: effect of processing on

70. bioaccessibility. Journal of Food Science

71. and Technology. 55(9): 3362-3372.

72. Kumar, P., Yadava, R. K., Gollen, B., Kumar, S.,

73. Verma, R. K and Yadav, S. 2011. Nutritional

74. contents and medicinal properties of

75. wheat:a review.Life Sciences and Medicine

76. Research. 22(1):1-10.

77. Malik, S. 2015. Pearl millet-nutritional value and

78. medicinal uses. International journal of

79. advance research and innovative. 1(3):

80. -418.

81. Mushtari, B. J., Shamshad, B. S., Vidya, K.,

82. Sahoo, M and Vijayakumari, J. 2017.

83. Nutritional evaluation of decorticated finger

84. millet (Finger millet-Rice) and its diversified

85. nutri-rich products. International Journal of

86. Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

87. (6): 44-50.

88. Nielsen, S. S. 2010. Determination of moisture

89. content. In: Food Analysis laboratory

90. Manual. Springer, Boston, MA. pp. 17-27.

91. Pathak, N., Bhaduri, A and Rai, A.K. 2019.

92. Sesame: bioactive compounds and health

93. benefits. Bioactive Molecules in Food.5

94. (1): 181-200.

95. Patil, S. R., Kurhekar, S. P and Patil, R. R. 2011.

96. Development of green gram fortified

97. biscuit. International Journal of Processing

98. and Post Harvest Technology. 2(2): 121-

99. Pingali, P., Mittra, B and Rahman, A. 2017. The

100. bumpy road from food to nutrition security–

101. slow evolution of India’s food policy. Global

102. Food Security.15: 77-84.

103. Priebe, M., Van Binsbergen, J., De Vos, R and

104. Vonk, R. J. 2008. Whole grain foods for

105. the prevention of type-2 diabetes

106. mellitus. Cochrane Database of

107. Systematic Reviews. 1: 5-11.

108. Southan, M. 2006. Production of novel rice flour

109. fractions.A Report for the Rural Industries

110. Research and Development Corporation.

111. RIRDC Publication, Australia. pp. 196-201.

112. Syed, Q. A., Akram, M and Shukat, R. 2019.

113. Nutritional and therapeutic importance of

114. the pumpkin seeds. Biomedical Journal of

115. Scientific and Technical Research. 21(2):

116. -15803.

117. Taynath, S. J., Adhau, G. W and Said, P. P. 2018.

118. Development and sensory evaluation of

119. ragi-wheat composite cake. Current

120. Research in Nutrition and Food Science

121. Journal. 6(1): 142-147.

122. Verma, D. K and Shukla, K. 2011. Nutritional

123. value of rice and their importance. Journal

124. of Indian Farmers Digest. 44 (1): 21-35.

125. WHO/ FAO. 2013. Promotion of underutilized

126. indigenous food resources for food

127. security and nutrition in Asia- Pacific

128. region. RAP publication, Thailand. pp.5.

129. Zema, T., Bosha, T and Belachew, T. 2015.

130. Blending germinated maize, pumpkin pulp

131. and its seed improves zinc and vitamin A

132. without compromising nutritive value and

133. sensory attributes of local complementary

134. food porridge. Food and Public Health.

135. (4): 103-107.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2022

How to Cite

MANISHA SHARMA* and S. KOWSALYA. (2022). IMPACT OF PRIMARY PROCESSING TECHNIQUES ON THE NUTRITIONAL VALUES OF COMMONLY CONSUMED CEREALS, LEGUMES AND OILSEEDS. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 50(2), 106-117. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/TJRA/article/view/133399