IDENTIFICATION OF DROUGHT TOLERANT MUTANT LINES BASED ON GENETIC VARIABILITY AND DIVERSITY STUDIES IN RICE (Oryza sativa L.)
195 / 73
Keywords:
Genetic variability, Reproductive stage moisture stress, Mutant linesAbstract
The study aimed to identify suitable donors for yield and drought-tolerance and its utilization in
drought breeding program. A total of 10 gamma mutant rice lines and four genotypes were studied for
12 morpho-physiological parameters under moisture stress condition during rabi, 2018-2019. High
genotypic coefficient of variation and phenotypic coefficient of variation values were recorded for the
traits spikelets per panicle, 1000 seed weight, relative membrane injury and filled grain number per
panicle under control conditions. While, under moisture stress condition filled grains per panicle,
grain yield per panicle, spikelet fertility and 1000 seed weight exhibited higher GCV and PCV values.
High heritability coupled with high genetic advance was observed for number of filled grains per
panicle and number of spikelets per panicle under both controlled and moisture stress condition
representing additive gene action whose selection might be effective in future breeding programmes.
Correlation studies revealed a positive and significant association of traits plant height, panicle length,
number of filled grains per panicle, spikelets per panicle, SPAD chlorophyll meter reading and specific
leaf area with grain yield per plant in both control and moisture stress conditions. Divergence studies
categorized the population into four clusters under control condition and three clusters under
reproductive stage moisture stress conditions. Based on inter-cluster distance inclusion of genotypes
under cluster II and IV in future hybridization programmes may result in the development of drought
tolerant high yielding varieties.
References
1. Allard, R.W. 1960. Principles of plant breeding.
2. John Wiley and Sons, New York.pp.16-36.
3. Bunnag, S and Pongthai, P. 2013. Selection of
4. rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars tolerant to
5. drought stress at the vegetative stage
6. under field conditions. American Journal of
7. Plant Sciences. 4: 1701 - 1708.
8. Jaleel, C.A., Manivannan, P., Wahid, A., Farooq,
9. M., AlJuburi, H.J.,Somasundaram, R
10. and Panneer selvam R. 2009. Drought
11. stress in plants: A review on morphological
12. characteristics and pigments composition.
13. International Journal of Agricultural
14. Biology. 11 (1):100-105.
15. Choudhary, M.K., Basu, D., Datt, A.,
16. Chakraborty, N and Chakraborty, S. 2009.
17. Dehydration responsive nuclear proteome
18. of rice (Oryza sativa L.) illustrates protein
19. network, novel regulation of cellular
20. adaptation and evolutionary perspective.
21. Molecular Cellular Proteomics. 8: 1579 -
22. Edukondalu, B., Reddy, R.V., Rani, S.T., Kumari,
23. A.C and Soundharya, B. 2017. Studies on
24. variability, heritability, correlation and path
25. analysis for yield and yield attributes in Rice
26. (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of
27. Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences.
28. (10): 2369-2376. Doi: https://doi.org/
29. 20546/ijcmas.2017.610.279.
30. Falconer, D. S. Introduction to Quantitative
31. Genetics. Longman, New York, NY, USA, 3rd
32. Edition, 1989. pp.16-44.
33. Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D
34. and Basra, S. M. A. 2009. Plant drought
35. stress: effects, mechanisms and
36. management. Agronomy sustainability
37. development. 29: 185–212. 10.1051/
38. agro:2008021.
39. Gaballah, M.M., Metwally, A.M., Skalicky, M.,
40. Hassan, M.M., Brestic, M., EL Sabagh, A and
41. Fayed, A.M. 2021.Genetic diversity of
42. selected rice genotypes under water stress
43. conditions. Plants. 10- 27. https://dx.doi.org/
44. 3390/ plants10010027.
45. IRRI. 1993. Rice Almanac ( Maclean, J.L., Dawe,
46. D.C., Hardy, B,, Hettel, G.P., Editors).
47. International Rice Research Institute, Los
48. Banos.pp. 257-258.
49. Jaleel, C.A., Manivannan, P., Wahid, A.,
50. Farooq, M., Juburi, H.J., Somasundaram,
51. A.R and Panneerselvam, R. 2009. Drought
52. stress in plants: A review on morphological
53. characteristics and pigments composition
54. International Journal of Agricultural Biology.
55. (1): 100-105.
56. Lagoda, P. J. L. 2008. Networking and fostering
57. of cooperation in plant mutation genetics
58. and breeding: role of the joint FAO/IAEA
59. programme FAO/IEAE.In: Proceedings of
60. the International Symposium on Induced
61. Mutations in Plants, Vienna, Austria, 2-
62. August 2008.
63. Larik, A.S., Memon, S and Soomro, Z.A. 2009.
64. Radiation induced polygenic mutations
65. in Sorghum bicolor L. Journal of Agricultural
66. Research. 47: 11-19.
67. Meenakshi, T., Ratinam, A. A.D and Backiyarani,
68. S. 1999. Correlation and path analysis of
69. yield and some physiological characters in
70. rainfed rice. Oryza.6: 154-156,
71. Nagaraja, T.E.,Ajit, K.R and Golasangi, B.S.C.
72. Genetic diversity study in linseed
73. (Linum usitatissimum L.). Journal of
74. Maharashtra Agricultural Universities. 22:
75. -251.
76. Nguyen, H.T.,Babu, R.C and Blum, A. 1997.
77. Breeding for drought resistance in rice:
78. Physiology and molecular genetics
79. considerations. Crop Science. 37 (5): 1426-
80. Oladosu, Y., Rafii, M. Y., Abdullah, N., Abdul
81. Malek, M., Rahim, H. A., Hussin, G., Latif,
82. M,A and Kareem, I. 2014. Genetic variability
83. and selection criteria in rice mutant lines as
84. revealed by quantitative traits. The Scientific
85. World Journal.1-12. doi:10.1155/2014/
86. Pantuwan, G., Fukai, S., Cooper, M.,
87. Rajatasereekul, S and Toole, J.O. 2002.
88. Yield response of rice (Oryza sativa L.)
89. genotypes to drought under rainfed lowland.
90. Field Crops Research, 73: 181-200. https:/
91. /doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00194-0.
92. Rajiv, S., Thivendran, P and Deivannai, S. 2010.
93. Genetic divergence of rice on some
94. morpholoical and physiochemical
95. responses to drought stress. Pertanika
96. Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science. 33:
97. -328.
98. Ratna, M., Begum, S., Husna, A., Dey, S.R and
99. Hossain, M.S. 2015. Correlation and path
100. coefficient analysis in Basmati rice.
101. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural
102. Research. 40 (1): 153-161.
103. Robinson, H. F., Comstock, R. E and Harvey, P.
104. H. 1949. Genotypic and phenotypic
105. correlation in corn and their implications in
106. selection. Agronomy Journal. 43: 282–287.
107. Shukla, A. Panchal, H. Mishra, M. Patel, P. R.
108. Srivastava, H. S. Patel, P. and Shukla, A. K.
109. Soil moisture estimation using
110. gravimetric technique and FDR probe
111. technique: A comparative analysis. In:
112. American International Journal of Research
113. in Formal Applied & Natural Sciences. 8(1):
114. -92.
115. Silva, M. D. A., Jifon, J. L., Da Silva, J. A. G and
116. Sharma, V. 2007. Use of physiological
117. parameters as fast tools to screen for
118. drought tolerance in sugarcane. Brazilian
119. Journal of Plant Physiology. 19(3):193-
120. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-
121. Singh, R. K and Choudhary, B. D. 1985.
122. Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic
123. Analysis, Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi,
124. India.pp. 23-28.
125. Sivasubramanian S. S and Madhava Menon, P.
126. Genotypic and phenotypic variability
127. in rice. Madras Agricultural Journal. 60:
128. -1096.
129. Xu, Z.Z and Zhou, G.S. 2007. Photosynthetic
130. recovery of a perennial grass Leymuschinensis
131. after different periods of soil
132. drought. Plant Production Science.
133. (3):277–285.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.