EVALUATION OF INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES AGAINST STEM ROT OF GROUNDNUT (Sclerotium rolfsii) UNDER POT CULTURE


298 / 188

Authors

  • P. ARUNASRI*, B. PADMODAYA, M.REDDI KUMAR, S.R. KOTESWARA RAO, B. RAVINDRA REDDY and S. TIRUMALA REDDY Department of Plant Pathology, S.V. Agricultural College, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Tirupati - 517 502

Keywords:

Sclerotium rolfsii, stem rot, viability of sclerotia, combi fungicides, ITK inputs, Organic amendments, Trichoderma

Abstract

The study is aimed at determining the viability of sclerotia of S. rolfsii under pot culture studies.
Eight combination fungicides were used. The fungicides were applied to soil by soil drenching (0.01%).
Furthermore, 10 Trichoderma isolates (T.asperellum GT1, GT4, GT15, GT23, GT25, GT60,
GT61,GTNT and GTw38(2)), five organic amendments and five ITK inputs (Modified Panchagavya,
beejamrutham, jeevamrutham, cow urine and butter milk) were evaluated on sclerotial viability. Out of
the eight fungicides, Hexaconazole 4% + Zineb 68% WP has inhibited sclerotial viability or germination
to 98.88% (Overall mean). Talc based formulations of Trichoderma isolates were applied to soil @5g/
kg soil. Organic amendments were ground into powder and applied to soil @30g/kg, whereas, ITK
inputs applied as soil drenching. Results indicated that, at 5 cm depth of soil. Hexaconazole+Zineb
has inhibited sclerotial germination to cent percent. At 10 cm and 20 cm also this combi fungicides
has shown highest inhibition of germination or viability of sclerotia. In the case of Trichoderma isolates
(T.asperellum GT1, GT4, GT15, GT23, GT25, GT60, GT61,GTNT and GTw38(2).Trichoderma
asperellum GT4 has shown overall mean inhibition of sclerotial germination or viability to 100% with
efficacy at all the three depths. Neem cake (3%) and gingelly cake have inhibited sclerotia to maximum
extent but neem cake was proved to be effective in percent inhibition of sclerotia (97.78%). Out of the
five ITK inputs, modified Panchgavya (10 dilution) was effective with overall mean inhibition of 96.66%
and showed highest percentage of sclerotial inhibition at 5cm,10cm and 20cm when compared to the
Control (untreated plot). The results showed the efficacy of ITK inputs, organic amendments and
Trichoderma isolates in inhibiting sclerotial viability of S. rolfsii under pot culture in greenhouse
conditions.

References

1. Aycock R. 1966.Stem rot and other diseases

2. caused by Sclerotium rolfsii. N.C. State

3. University. Technical Bulletin. Vol. 174: 202.

4. Barnett, H. H and Hunter, B.B.1972. Illustrated

5. benera of Imperfect fungi. Burgess

6. Publishing Company. Minnosota. pp.43-48.

7. Baskey, S., S. Khalko, S. Hembram, B. R.

8. Sharma and Ali, S. 2020. Survey for the

9. incidence of stem rot of groundnut in North

10. Bengal districts of West Bengal, India.

11. International Journal of Current Microbiology

12. and Applied Sciences. 9(01): 328-333.

13. Bhagat, S and Pan,S.2011. Parasitic ability of

14. Trichoderma isolates against sclerotia of

15. Sclerotium rolfsii and management of collar

16. rot of brinjal. Biopesticide

17. International.7(1):112-115.

18. Blum, L.E.B and Rodríguez-Kábana, R.2004.

19. Effect of soil organic amendments on

20. sclerotial germination, mycelial growth, and

21. Sclerotium rolfsii-induced diseases.

22. Fitopatologia Brasileira. 29:66-74.

23. Deacon, J.W. 2006. Fungal Biology (4th Edition).

24. Blackwell publishers,U.S.A. pp.93-96.

25. Dubey,R.C., Kumar, H and Pandey, R.R.2009.

26. Fungitoxic effect of Neem extracts on growth

27. and sclerotial survival of Macrophomina

28. phaseolina in vitro. Journal of American

29. Science. 5(5):17-24.

30. Gandhi,V., Taya,R.S and Kumar, A. 2017. Viability

31. of sclerotia of Sclerotium rolfsii at different

32. depths and durations in soil. Indian Journal

33. of Agricultural Research. 51(6):601-605.

34. Gomez, K.A and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical

35. Procedure for Agricultural Research

36. (Second Edition). John Wiley and Sons,

37. New York.

38. Gopalakrishnan, S., Beale, M,H., Ward, J.L and

39. Strange R,N. 2005. Chickpea wilt:

40. identification and toxicity of methyl fusarubin

41. from Fusarium acutatum. Phytochemistry.

42. : 1536-1539.

43. Jebaraj, M.D., Hubballi, M., Selvaraj, M.,

44. Jagannathan, R and Srinivasan,V.M.2012.

45. Combining Pseudomonas and Trichoderma

46. strains with organic amendments to

47. enhance suppression of Root rot disease

48. incidence in Coleus. International Journal

49. of Current Research. 4(4).166-126.

50. Karthika, S.R., Sajeena, A., Girija, V.K., John, J

51. and Heera,G. 2017. Antifungal activities of

52. organic preparations, botanicals and

53. nonhazardous chemicals against

54. Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn causing sheath

55. blight of rice. Journal of Tropical Agriculture.

56. (1):104-113.

57. Khattabi,N., Ezzahiri B., Louali,L and Oihab,A.

58. Effect of fungicides and Trichoderma

59. harzianum on sclerotia of Sclerotium rolfsii.

60. Phytoplathologia Mediterranea. 40:143-

61. Khattabi,N., Ezzahiri B., Louali, Land Oihab,A.

62. Effect of nitrogen fertilizers and

63. Trichoderma harzianum on Sclerotium

64. rolfsii. Agronomy. 24 (5): 281-288.

65. Madhavi,B.G and Bhattiprolu, S.L.2011.

66. Integrated disease management of dry root

67. rot of chilli incited by Sclerotium rolfsii

68. (Sacc.).International Journal of Plant,

69. Animal and Environmental Sciences.

70. (2):31-37.

71. Prabhu,H.V and Hiremath, P.C.2003. Bioefficacy

72. of fungicides against collar rot of cotton

73. caused by Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. Karnataka

74. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 16(4):576-

75. Punja Z,K.1985.The Biology,Ecology and control

76. of Sclerotium rolfsii. Annual Review of

77. Phytopathology. 23: 97-127.

78. Raghavendra, B. 2018. Studies on the

79. Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc. incitant of stem rot

80. of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Ph.D

81. Thesis submitted to Acharya N.G. Ranga

82. Agricultural University, Guntur.

83. Rajeswari, E., Padmodaya, B., Viswanath,K and

84. Sumathi,P. 2018. Anti-fungal effect of

85. organic amendments on the mycelial growth

86. and scleorial viability of Rhizoctonia solani

87. Kuhn. Andhra Pradesh Journal of

88. Agricultural Sciences. 4(4):259-267.

89. Rangaswami,G and Mahadevan,A.1999.

90. Diseases of Crop Plants in India (Fourth

91. Edition). Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd, New

92. Delhi. pp. 60-79.

93. Shoeraj Singh, Prajapathi,R.K., Srivastava,

94. S.S.L., Pandey,R.K and Gupta, P.K.2007.

95. Evaluation of different botanicals and non

96. target pesticides against Sclerotium rolfsii

97. causing collar rot of lentil.Indian

98. Phytopathology. 60:499-501.

99. Smith,V.L., Jenkins, S.F., Punja, Z.K and Benson,

100. D.M. 1989. Survival of sclerotia of

101. Sclerotium rolfsii: Influence of sclerotial

102. treatment and depth of soil. Soil Biological

103. Biochemistry 21(5):627-632.

Downloads

Published

17-02-2023

How to Cite

P. ARUNASRI*, B. PADMODAYA, M.REDDI KUMAR, S.R. KOTESWARA RAO, B. RAVINDRA REDDY and S. TIRUMALA REDDY. (2023). EVALUATION OF INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES AGAINST STEM ROT OF GROUNDNUT (Sclerotium rolfsii) UNDER POT CULTURE. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 49(2), 43-54. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/TJRA/article/view/133443