INTEGRATION AND CAUSALITY OF MAJOR GARLIC MARKETS IN UTTAR PRADESH STATE
184 / 68
Authors
-
SUNIL JHADE * and ABHISHEK SINGH
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi - 221 005
Keywords:
Augmented Dickey-Fuller, Co-integration, Granger causality test, Market integration, StationarityAbstract
Garlic prices showed volatility over the past few years, exposing the growers to more risk and
consumers paying more.The lack of market intelligence about the potential markets and their pattern
of arrivals and prices are the main causes for distress sale of the garlic. The study was aimed to
assess the extent and integration among garlic major markets and to study the price movement of
garlic major markets in Uttar Pradesh. Different tests viz.,Augmented Dickey-Fuller test, Johansen
co-integration test, Granger causality test were used for analysis,Monthly wholesale prices from January
2010 to December 2019 of garlic were collected from major garlic markets in Uttar Pradesh. The
study recorded that all major markets were well-integrated and at least two co-integrating equations
were confirmed by the Johansen test. The Granger causality test indicated that there was bi-directional
causality observed in garlic prices between Etah and Luckow markets. The remaining all market pairs
exhibited unidirectional causality and affects.
References
1. AGMARKNET. 2020. Prices of four major garlic
2. markets of Uttar Pradesh. Retrieved from
3. the website (http://www.agmarket.gov.in) on
4. 01.2021.
5. Gayathri, S., Tingre, A.S and Deshmukh, R.G.
6. a. Price Analysis of Garlic for Major
7. Markets of Maharashtra, India. International
8. Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied
9. Sciences. 6: 2659-2666.
10. Gayathri, S., Tingre A.S and Deshmukh, R.G.
11. b. Co-integration analysis and granger
12. casualty test of garlic for major markets of
13. Maharashtra. International Journal of
14. Chemical Studies. 6(6):2019-2021.
15. Granger,C.J.1969. Investigating causal
16. relationships by econometrics models and
17. cross spectral methods. Econometrica. 37:
18. -435.
19. Gujarati, D.N.2003. Basic Econometrics. New
20. York: McGraw Hill, Fourth Edition. pp.36-48.
21. Johansen, S.1988.Statistical Analysis of
22. Cointegration Vectors. Journal of Economic
23. Dynamics and Control.12: 231-254.
24. Reddy, B.S., Chandrashekhar, S.M., Dikshit, A.K
25. and Manohar, N.S. 2012. Price trend and
26. integration of wholesale markets for onion
27. in metro cities of India. Journal of Economics
28. and Sustainable Development. 3(70): 120-
29. Rita,P.R.2018. Econometric analysis of
30. production and marketing of safflower in
31. Marathwada region of Maharashtra. Ph.D
32. Thesis submitted to Vasantrao Naik
33. Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani,
34. Maharashtra.
35. Sekhar, C.S.C. 2012. Agricultural market
36. integration in India: An analysis of select
37. commodities. Food Policy. 37(3): 309-322.
38. Wani, M. H., Paul, R. K., Bazaz, N. H and Manzoor,
39. M.2015. Market integration and price
40. forecasting of apple in India. Indian Journal
41. of Agricultural Economics. 70(2): 169-181.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
