hyperactivity disorder in school going children aged between 5-12 years in Bengaluru. Current Pediatric Research. 21(2):321-326. Sam Richa, JihaneRohayem, RabihChammai, Francois Kazour, Ramzi Haddad, Sani Hleis, Abbas Alameddine, Bernard Gerbaka. 2012. AD


234 / 37

Authors

  • P.M. MEERA, C.L.SHARON*, SEEJA THOMACHAN, E.R. ANEENA and P.S. LAKSHMY Department of Community Science, College of Agriculture, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur- 680 656

Keywords:

Passion fruit, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Mango, Viability, Sensory evaluation

Abstract

Probiotics are increasingly being added to food products in order to develop functional foods
with health promoting effects. Hence, an attempt was made to develop a probiotic drink containing
passion fruit and mango involving L. acidophilus.In the study, five treatments (along with one control)
with three replications were standardized. The most acceptable combination (50% Passion fruit + 50
% Mango) of the drink was pasteurised at 800C for 20 minutes and allowed to cool. The pasteurised
drink was then inoculated with 4ìl L.acidophilus and incubated for a period of one hour at 370C which
had availability of 13. 35 log cfu g-1.The probiotic passion fruit based drink along with its control(nonprobiotic
drink) had TSS content of 12.50 and 13.20 0Brix, titratable acidity of 1.98 % and 1.60 % ,
total sugar 16.66 and 17.10 g 100 g-1, reducing sugar 4.08 and 4.40 g 100 g-1, protein 0.70 and 0.36
g 100 g-1, carbohydrate 13.32 and 14.72 100 g-1, energy of 56.08 and 60.32 Kcal, ascorbic acid of 10
mg 100 g-1 and 13.7 mg 100 g-1and total ash 1.60 % and 1.52 %, respectively.

References

1. Acevedo-Martinez, E.C., Gutierrez-Cortes, C.,

2. Garcia-Mahecha, M., and Diaz-Moreno, A.C.

3. Evaluation of viability of probiotic

4. bacteria in mango (Mangifera indica L.)

5. beverage. Dyna. 85 (207): 84-9.

6. Adams, M.R., Moss, M.O and Mcclure, P. J. 2008.

7. Bacterial agents of foodborne illness

8. Staphylococcus aureus. Food Microbiology.

9. (2): 252-256.

10. Agrawal, G.P and Hasija, S.K. 1986. Microorganism

11. in the laboratory: A Laboratory

12. guide of Microbiology, Mycology and Plant

13. Pathology. Print House (India), Lucknow. pp.

14. -156.

15. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical

16. Chemists). 1994. Official Methods for

17. Analysis. Association of Official Analytical

18. Chemists. 14th Edition. Washington D.C.,

19. USA. pp.1141-1142.

20. Bhagwan, D and Awadhesh, K. 2014.

21. Development and storage of mango ginger

22. RTS beverage. International Journal of

23. Food, Agriculture and Veterinary Science.

24. (3): 15-20.

25. Charan, S. M. 2016. Value addition of passion

26. fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims.). M.Sc.

27. (Processing Technology) thesis submitted

28. to Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur.

29. Fernandes, A.G., Santos, G.M.D., Silva, D.S.D.,

30. Sousa, P.H.M.D., Maia, G.A and Figueiredo,

31. R.W.D.2011. Chemical and physicochemical

32. characteristics changes during

33. passion fruit juice processing. Food Science

34. and Technology. 31(3): 747-751.

35. Food Safety and Standards Authority of India

36. (FSSAI). 2010. Food safety and standards

37. regulations. Retrieved from the website

38. (fssai.gov.in.) on 25.6.2021.

39. Gallina, D. A., Barbosa, P. D. P. M., Ormenese,

40. R.D.C.S.C and Garcia, A. D. O. 2019.

41. Development and characterization of

42. probiotic fermented smoothie beverage.

43. Revista Ciência Agronômica: 50(3): 378-

44. Jellinek, G. 1985. Sensory Evaluation of Food:

45. Theory and Practice. Ellis Horwood,

46. Chichester, England. pp. 596-598.

47. Jood, S and Khetarpaul, N. 2005. Improving

48. nutritional quality of course cereals through

49. probiotic fermentation. Processing Food

50. Industry. Vol. 23:17-25.

51. Liu, X. J., Pu, J. Z and Yu, L. M. 2017. Research

52. progress on deep processing status and

53. bioactivity of passion fruit. Guangzhou

54. Chemical Industry. Vol. 45: 23-24.

55. Monteiro, S. S., Beserra, A. S. Y., Oliveira, M. L.

56. H and Pasquali, M. A. D. B. 2020. Production

57. of probiotic passion fruit (Passiflora edulis

58. Sims f.flavicarpa Deg.) drink using

59. Lactobacillus reuteri and micro

60. encapsulation via spray drying. Foods.

61. (3): 335-336.

62. Rafiq, S., Sharma, V., Nazir, A., Rashid, R and

63. Sofi, S.A. 2016. Development of probiotic

64. carrot juice. Journal of Nutrition and Food

65. Science. Vol.6: 2-5.

66. Ranganna, S. 1986. Manual of Analysis of Fruits

67. and Vegetable Products. Tata Mc Graw Hill

68. Publishing Co. Ltd, New Delhi.pp.130-131.

69. Ranjitha, K., Oberoi, H. S., Upreti, K. Kand

70. Redappa, K. 2018. Screening of probiotic

71. strains for development of ready-to-serve

72. probiotic mango beverage. Journal of

73. Horticulture Science. (13)2:164-171.

74. Sadasivam, S and Manickam, A.1992.

75. Biochemical Methods (2nd Edition.). New Age

76. International Private Limited, New Delhi.

77. pp. 254-256.

78. Shukla, M., Jha, Y. K and Admassu, S. 2013.

79. Development of probiotic beverage from

80. whey and pineapple juice. Journal of Food

81. Processing and Technology. 4(2): 1-4.

82. Sobhana, A., Mathew, J., Ambili Appukutan, A

83. and Mredhula Raghavan, C. 2011. Blending

84. of cashew apple juice with fruit juices and

85. spices for improving nutritional quality and

86. palatability. Proceedings of International

87. symposium on Cashewnut. International

88. Society of Horticultural Science held during

89. th -12th December, 2011, Madurai. pp.375-

90. Stanton, C., Ross, R. P., Fitzgerald, G.F and

91. Sinderen, D.V. 2005. Fermented functional

92. foods based on probiotics and their biogenic

93. metabolites. Current Opinion in

94. Biotechnology. 16(2): 198-203.

95. Thokchom, R and Mandal, G. 2017. Production

96. preference and importance of passion fruit

97. (Passiflora edulis): A review. Journal of

98. Agricultural Engineering and Food

99. Technology. 4(1): 27-30.

100. WHO (World Health Organisation). 2001. Health

101. and nutritional properties of probiotics in

102. food including powder milk with live lactic

103. acid bacteria. WHO, Cordoba, Argentina.

104. pp.168-169.

Downloads

Published

30-09-2021

How to Cite

P.M. MEERA, C.L.SHARON*, SEEJA THOMACHAN, E.R. ANEENA and P.S. LAKSHMY. (2021). hyperactivity disorder in school going children aged between 5-12 years in Bengaluru. Current Pediatric Research. 21(2):321-326. Sam Richa, JihaneRohayem, RabihChammai, Francois Kazour, Ramzi Haddad, Sani Hleis, Abbas Alameddine, Bernard Gerbaka. 2012. AD. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 49(3), 64-71. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/TJRA/article/view/133548