MARKER ASSISTED BREEDING WITHOUT BACKGROUND SELECTION FOR IMPROVEMENT OF DROUGHT TOLERANCE IN A BREAD WHEAT CULTIVAR


237 / 75

Authors

  • AMARDEEP* and T. SINGH Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Kisan (P.G.) College, Chaudhary Charan Singh University, Simbhaoli, Hapur- 245 207

Keywords:

Wheat, HD2967, MAS, QTL, foreground selection, phenotypic selection

Abstract

Drought stress is a major limiting factor in wheat production. The study was conducted during
rabi crop seasons from 2010-11 to 2019-20 by utilizing a marker-assisted selection scheme to
introgress a major drought insensitive yield QTL (Qyld.csdh.7AL) from SQ1 into Indian wheat cultivar
(HD2967) using SSR marker Xwmc273.3, leading to the development of 3 improved wheat lines
having relatively higher grain yield under water stress condition. HD2967, a high yielding wheat cultivar
which has been proved as a successful variety for northwestern plain zone (NWPZ) of India but
sensitive to drought stress, was used as the recurrent parent. For introgression of this major yield
QTL, a cross between HD2967 and SQ1 was made and subsequently two back crosses with recurrent
parent (HD2967) were attempted during the off/crop seasons. QTL was validated in the BC1F2
population using foreground selection followed by the collection of phenotypic data (grain weight/ear,
grain weight/plant, plant biomass, flag leaf chlorophyll content, and harvest index) of two groups of
plants having SQ1 and HD2967 alleles for the QTL. After foreground and phenotypic selection,
homozygous superior lines containing the SQ1 allele for the QTL Qyld.csdh.7AL were selected in
BC2F4 population. The high yield in the selected plants was attributed to grain weight/plant, biomass/
plant, and flag leaf chlorophyll content.

References

1. garwal, P.K., Agarwal, P., Reddy, M.K and

2. Sopory, S.K. 2006. Role of DREB

3. transcription factors in abiotic and biotic

4. stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell

5. Reports.25: 1263-1274.

6. Agbicodo, E.M., Fatokun, E.C.A., Muranaka,

7. E.S., Visser, R.G.F and Lindenvander, C.G.

8. Breeding drought tolerant cowpea:

9. constraints, accomplishments, and future

10. prospects. Euphytica. 167: 353-370.

11. Ashley, J.1993.Drought and crop adaptation. In:

12. Dryland farming in Africa (Rowland, J.R.J.

13. Editor). UK, Macmillan Press Ltd. pp. 46-

14. Bansal, R., Pradheep, K., Kumari, J., Kumar, S.,

15. Yadav, M.C., Gurung, B., Kumari, N.K.P and

16. Rana, J.C. 2016. Physiological and

17. biochemical evaluation for drought

18. tolerance in wheat germplasm collected from

19. arid western plains of India. Indian Journal

20. of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 53: 212-

21. Blum, A.1988.Plant breeding for stress

22. environments. Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

23. CRC Press Inc. pp.62-70.

24. Blum, A.2005. Drought resistance, water use

25. efficiency and yield potential- are they

26. compatible, dissonant, or mutually

27. exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural

28. Research. 56: 1159-1168.

29. MARKER ASSISTED BREEDING WITHOUT BACKGROUND SELECTION IN A BREAD WHEAT CULTIVAR

30. Bohnert, H.J., Nelson, D.E and Jensen,

31. R.G.1995.Adaptations to environmental

32. stresses. The Plant Cell. 7: 1099-1111.

33. Boussakouran, A., Sakar, E.H., Yamani, M.E and

34. Rharrabti, Y.2019. Morphological traits

35. associated with drought stress tolerance in

36. six Moroccan Durum Wheat varieties

37. released between 1984 and 2007. Journal

38. of Crop Science and Biotechnology. 22:

39. -353.

40. Chen, S., Lin, X.H., Xu, C.G and Zhang,

41. Q.2000.Improvement of bacterial blight

42. resistance of ‘Minghui 63’, an elite restorer

43. line of hybrid rice, by molecular markerassisted

44. selection.Crop Science. 40: 239–

45. Gautam, T., Amardeep, Saripalli, G., Rakhi,

46. Kumar, A., Gahlaut, V., Gadekar, D.A., Oak,

47. M., Sharma, P.K., Balyan, H.S and Gupta,

48. P.K.2020. Introgression of a drought

49. insensitive grain yield QTL for improvement

50. of four Indian bread wheat cultivars using

51. marker assisted breeding without

52. background selection. Journal of Plant

53. Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Doi: https:/

54. /doi.org/10.1007/s13562-020-00553-0.

55. Gupta, H.S., Agrawal, P.K., Mahajan, V., Bisht,

56. G.S., Kumar, A., Verma, P., Srivastava, A.,

57. Saha, S., Babu, R., Pant, M.C and Mani,

58. V.P.2009. Quality protein maize for

59. nutritional security: rapid development of

60. short duration hybrids through molecular

61. marker assisted breeding. Current Science.

62. :230-237.

63. Gupta, P.K., Langridge, P and Mir, R.R. 2010.

64. Marker-assisted wheat breeding: Present

65. status and future possibilities. Molecular

66. Breeding. 26: 145-161.

67. Izanloo, A., Condon, A.G., Langridge, P., Tester,

68. M and Schnurbusch, T.2008. Different

69. mechanisms of adaptation to cyclic water

70. stress in two South Australian bread wheat

71. cultivars. Journal of Experimental Botany.

72. (12): 3327-3346.

73. Mitra, J. 2001.Genetics and genetic improvement

74. of drought resistance of crop plants.

75. Current Science. 80: 758–763.

76. Mollasadeghi, V., Imani, A.A., Shahryari, R and

77. Khayatne Zhad, M. 2011.Correlation and

78. path analysis of morphological traits in

79. different wheat genotypes under end

80. drought stress condition. Middle-East

81. Journal of Scientific Research. 7(2): 221-

82. Mwadzingeni, L., Shimelis, H., Dube, E., Laing,

83. M.D and Tsilo, T.J.2016. Breeding wheat for

84. drought tolerance: Progress and

85. technologies. Journal of Integrative

86. Agriculture. 15(5): 935-943.

87. Quarrie, S.A., Quarrie, S.P., Radosevic, R.,

88. Rancic, D., Kaminska, A.S., Barnes, J.D.,

89. Leverington, M., Ceolini, C and Dodig,

90. D.2006. Dissecting a wheat QTL for yield

91. present in a range of environments: from

92. the QTL to candidate genes. Journal of

93. Experimental Botany. 57(11): 2627–2637.

94. Quarrie, S.A., Steed, A., Calestani, C.,

95. Semikhodskii, A., Lebreton, C., Chinoy, C.,

96. Steele, N., Pljevijakusic, D., Waterman, E.,

97. Weyen, J., Schondelmaier, J., Habash, D.Z.,

98. Farmer, P., Saker, L., Clarkson, D.T.,

99. Abugalieva, A., Yessimbekova, M.,

100. AMARDEEP and SINGH

101. Turuspekov, Y., Abugalieva, S., Tuberosa,

102. R., Sanguineti, M.C., Hollington, P.A.,

103. Aragues, R., Royo, A and Dodig, D. 2005. A

104. high-density genetic map of hexaploid

105. wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) from the cross

106. Chinese Spring x SQ1 and its use to

107. compare QTLs for grain yield across a

108. range of environments. Theoretical and

109. Applied Genetics. 110(5): 865-880.

110. Rai, N., Bellundagi, A., Kumar, P.K., Kalasapura

111. Thimmappa, R., Rani, S., Sinha, N., Krishna,

112. H., Jain, N., Singh, G.P., Singh, P.K and

113. Chand, S. 2018. Marker assisted backcross

114. breeding for improvement of drought

115. tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum

116. L. emThell). Plant Breeding. 137(4): 514-

117. Richards, R.A., Rawson, H.M and Johnson,

118. D.A.1986.Glaucousness in wheat: Its

119. development and effect on water-use

120. efficiency, gas exchange and photosynthetic

121. tissue temperatures. Australian Journal of

122. Plant Physiology. 13(4): 465-473.

123. Saghai-Maroof, M.A., Soliman, K.M., Jorgensen,

124. R.A and Allard, R.W.1984. Ribosomal DNA

125. spacer-length polymorphisms in barley:

126. Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal

127. location and population dynamics.

128. Proceedings of the National Academy of

129. Sciences, USA. 81:8014–8018.

130. Sallam, A., Alqudah, A.M., Dawood, M.F.A.,

131. Baenziger, P.S and Börner, A.2019. Drought

132. Stress Tolerance in Wheat and Barley:

133. Advances in Physiology, Breeding and

134. Genetics Research. International Journal of

135. Molecular Sciences. 20(13):3137-3138.

136. doi:10.3390/ijms20133137.

137. Smith, M.E., Coffman, W.R and Baker, T.C.1990.

138. Environmental effects on selection under

139. high and low-input conditions. In: Genotypeby-

140. Environment Interaction and Plant

141. Breeding. Kang, M.S.(Editor). Baton Rouge:

142. Louisiana State University. 261–272.

143. Srivastava, A., Srivastava, P.,& Sharma, A and

144. Sarlach, R.S. 2017.Canopy temperature an

145. effective measure of drought stress

146. tolerance in RIL population of wheat.

147. Vegetos- An International Journal of Plant

148. Research.30:59.doi:10.5958/2229-

149. 2017.00011.8.

150. Turner, N.C., Wright, G.C and Siddique,

151. K.H.M.2001. Adaptation of grain legumes

152. (pulses) to water limited environments.

153. Advances in Agronomy. 71: 193-231.

154. Umezawa, T., Fujita, M., Fujita, Y., Yamguchi-

155. Shinozaki, K and Shinozaki, K.2006.

156. Engineering drought tolerance in plants:

157. discovering and tailoring genes to unlock

158. the future.Current Opinion in Biotechnology.

159. (2): 113-122.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2020

How to Cite

AMARDEEP* and T. SINGH. (2020). MARKER ASSISTED BREEDING WITHOUT BACKGROUND SELECTION FOR IMPROVEMENT OF DROUGHT TOLERANCE IN A BREAD WHEAT CULTIVAR. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 48(4), 1-11. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/TJRA/article/view/133590