IMPACT OF WEATHER PARAMETERS ON THE INCIDENCE OF WHITEFLY POPULATION IN DIFFERENT POTATO (Solanum tuberosum L.) CULTIVARS
336 / 128
Keywords:
Potato cultivars, Whitefly incidence, Population fluctuation, Weather parameters, Correlation,RegressionAbstract
Potato cultivars (13 no.) were assessed for the incidence of whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)
(Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) during Rabi seasons from 2015-2016 to 2017-2018. Initial whitefly population
is observed in the crop during3rd week of December (51st to 52nd meteorological standard week) with
the peak at 3rd to 4th week of February (7th to 8th MSW). However, the level of whitefly population was
varied among the potato cultivars. In all the cultivars, the whitefly population declined gradually after
the peak, however, over the duration the attainment of a higher population differed among the cultivars.
A significant and positive correlation of whitefly population was recorded with maximum and minimum
temperature and bright sunshine hours, whereas, maximum and minimum relative humidity had a
negative correlation. It was evident from the step-wise multiple regression analysis that maximum
temperature had a significant influence on the fluctuation of whitefly population. Besides, collective
influence (41.1% to 66.5%) of all the weather parameters on the whitefly population was also recorded
(from adjusted R2 value 0.411 to 0.665) in different potatocultivars.
References
1. Bhatnagar, A., Somani, A.K and Chander, S.
2. Build-up of Myzuspersicae and
3. development of mosaics on potato in
4. Central India. Potato Journal. 39: 208-210.
5. Chandramohan, N and Nanjan, K. 1992.
6. Reaction of five potato varieties to
7. greenhouse whitefly. South Indian
8. Horticulture. 40: 60-61.
9. Damos, P.T and Soultani, M.S. 2010.
10. Development and statistical evaluation of
11. models in forecasting moth phenology of
12. major lepidopterous peach pest complex for
13. Integrated Pest Management programs.
14. Crop Protection. 29:1190–1199.
15. Dharpure, S.R. 2002. Changing scenario of
16. insect pests of potato in Satpura plateau of
17. Madhya Pradesh. Journal of Potato. 99:135-
18. Gomez, K.A and Gomez, A.A 1984. Data that
19. violate some assumption of the analysis of
20. variance In: Statistical Procedures for
21. Agricultural Research. A Wiley-Interscience
22. Publication. USA. pp. 296-309.
23. GoI, 2019.National Horticulture Board. Ministry
24. of Agriculture, Govt. of India, Gurgaon,
25. Haryana. pp. 1-301.
26. Kishore, R., Singh, B and Parihar, S. 2005.
27. Population dynamics of whitefly Bemisia
28. tabaci Genn. on potato crop in relation to
29. weather factors. In: Proceedings of the
30. National Academy of Science, India. Section
31. B Biological sciences. 75: 257-260.
32. Konar, A and Paul, S. 2005. Efficacy of some
33. granular insecticides and pesticides against
34. mole cricket on potato. Journal of Applied
35. Zoological Researches. 16: 59-60.
36. Konar, A and Singh,N.J. 2009. Occurrence of
37. whitefly on various potato germplasms in
38. eastern gangetic plains of West Bengal. The
39. Journal of Plant Protection Science. 1: 21-
40. Lanunocheta, A and Pankaj, N. M. A. 2012.
41. Incidence of aphid and whitefly on different
42. planting dates in relation to abiotic factors
43. in potato variety Kufri Jyoti. International
44. Journal of Bio-Resource and Stress
45. Management. 3: 239-241.
46. Paul, S and Konar, A. 2003. Integrated pest
47. management of whitefly on potato in
48. gangetic plains of West Bengal. Proceedings
49. of the National Conference on “Recent
50. Environment Changes – Impact of Health,
51. Agriculture and Ecosystem”. University of
52. Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, held from 7th-
53. th August, 2003.pp. 26-29.
54. Paul, S and Konar, A. 2006. Ecology of
55. occurrence of important insect pest of potato
56. (Solanum tuberosum) and brinjal (Solanum
57. melongena) with their management. Ph.D.
58. thesis submitted to Bidhan Chandra Krishi
59. Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia, West
60. Bengal. pp.178-206.
61. Shera, P.S., Kumar, V and Aneja, A.
62. Seasonal abundance of sucking
63. insect pests on transgenic Bt Cotton vis-àvis
64. weather parameters in Punjab, India.
65. Acta Phytopathologicaet Entomologica
66. Hungarica.48 (1): 63-74.
67. Simpson, G.W. 1940. Whitefly and their relation
68. to the field transmission of potato viral
69. diseases in North-East Maine, USA. Maine
70. Agricultural Experiment – Statistical Bulletin.
71. pp.550-605.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.