DETERMINANTS OF CLASSROOM SEATING ARRANGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
475 / 327
Authors
-
G. SHAINY*, T. NEERAJA and V. PRASUNA
Department of Family Resource Management, College of Home Science Acharya N.G Ranga Agricultural University, Guntur - 522 034
Keywords:
Determinants, Classroom, Seating arrangement, Higher education institutionsAbstract
The study was to assess and evaluate the determinants of classroom seating arrangement in higher
education institutions in Guntur district of Andhra Pradesh. Thirty higher educational institutes (30 respondents)
were selected for the study. Eleven design features that guide the seating arrangement in a classroom proposed
by various higher educational institutes and official bodies served as a base for identifying the features to
evaluate the seating arrangement in a classroom. The results showed that educational institutes were not
paying attention to the modified fan-shaped design configuration, theatre-style seating, and seating arrangement
for students with disabilities. The total strength of the students and year of establishment of the institution
were the deciding factors in designing a seating arrangement in a class, row to row clearances, passage
clearances, minimum and maximum distance between the last row to end wall, clearances from the student's
desk adjacent wall, desk to desk clearances, seating for students with a disability and seating design
configuration.
References
1. Arizona State University. 2019. Campus
2. Technology Space Standards. UCL space.
3. pp.1-46.
4. Chiara, J.D and Callender, J.H.1987. Timesaver
5. standards for building types. 2nd
6. Edition. Singapore National Printers Ltd,
7. Singapore. pp.233-235.
8. Bureau of Indian standards. 1978. Recommendations
9. for basic requirements of
10. school buildings. Functional Requirements
11. in Building. CED. pp. 5 -12.
12. Solunac, A and Stevens, R.2010. Best Practices
13. Guide for Teaching and Learning Spaces.
14. Classroom Design Manual. 3rd Edition.
15. The University of Victoria. pp.1-20.
16. University of Cincinnati.2003. Design Guidance:
17. Learning Environments. pp.1-60.
18. University of Connecticut. 2016. Classroom
19. design guidelines. Planning architectural
20. and engineering services and classroom
21. management committee. pp.1-2.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
