DRAINAGE CO-EFFICIENT FOR MOLE DRAINS TO RECLAIM DEGRADED VERTISOLS OF GODAVARI BASIN


109 / 33

Authors

  • A. SAMBAIAH*, M. RAGHU BABU, G. RAVI BABU, G.V. LAKSHMI and S.B.S. NARASIMHA RAO AICRP (SAS & USW), Saline Water Scheme, ANGRAU, Bapatla - 522 101.

Keywords:

Mole drainage Co-efficient, Return period, Weibul's method, SCS-CN method, Sugarcane, Ponding, Waterlogging.

Abstract

Determination of drainage co-efficient for mole drains for Kapileswarapurammandal, East Godavari district
of Andhra Pradesh was carried out by considering 26-Years daily maximum rainfall events, normal daily
rainfall, Weibul's (5-Year Return Period) rainfall event, cumulative 10-day to 1-day maximum rainfall value, best
fitting distribution (5-Year Return Period) value. Among all, Weibul's (5-Year Return Period) rainfall event and
best fitting distribution (5-Year Return period) rainfall are close to each other and hence, the observed 1-day
maximumrainfall event, which is also arrived using Weibul's method i.e. 157.0 mm of 1-day maximum event
was considered for estimation of corresponding direct runoff. An event of 157.0 mm rainfall has potential for
damaging the surface layers of the vertisols by ponding and subsurface layers by waterlogging. To evacuate
both surface and subsurface matrix for avoiding the land degradation, effective drainage systems are to be
designed and made functional. To do so, the direct runoff was estimated using SCS-CN method which is found
to be 101.4 mm needs to be drained. The difference between the 1-day maximum rainfall event and the direct
surface runoff (101.4 mm) is the abstraction amount available for preferential flow into the mole drains, i.e.55.6
mm d-1. This becomes the drainage co-efficient requirement for the mole drains of the study area, which can
be used in Hooghoudt's equation to arrive at the mole drain spacing. In this study, mathematical models were
developed for estimation of mole drain co-efficient (M.D.C.) for the study area and found that the it relates to 1-
day maximum with 2nd order polynomial equation with co-efficient of determination of 0.9911 and it relates to
return period with logarithmic equation with co-efficient of determination of 0.9869.

References

Gates, T.K and Grismer, M.E. 1989. Irrigation

and drainage strategies in a salinity affected

region. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage

Engineering. 115(2):87–99.

Gebrehiwot, K.A. 2018.A review on waterlogging

salinization and drainage in Ethiopian

irrigated agriculture. Sustainable Water

Resources Management. 4(1):55-62.

Gomathi,R., GururajaRao, P.N., Chandran, K

and Selvi, A. 2014. Adaptive responses of

sugarcane to waterlogging stress: an over

view. Review Article. Sugar Technology.

(4):325-338.

Maji, A.K., Obi Reddy, G.P and Dipak Sarkar.

Degraded and wastelands of India:

Status and spatial distribution. Directorate

of Information and Publications of

Agriculture, Indian Council of Agricultural

Research, New Delhi. June, 2010. pp. 3-5.

National Commission on Agriculture (NCA), GoI,

New Delhi.1976. Report of the National

Commission on Agriculture. Part-V:

Resource Development.pp.186.

Radha Jain, Anshu Singh, Singh, S., Singh, C.P.,

Singh, R.K., Singh, S.P., Srivastava, V.K.,

Chandra, A., Pathak, A.D and Solomon, S.

Variation in juice quality traits of

sugarcane genotypes under waterlogged

condition in subtropical India.Climate

Change and Environmental Sustainability.

(1):50-58.

Scott, H.D and Batchelor, J.T. 1979. Dry weight

and leaf area production rates of irrigated

determinate soybeans. Agronomy Journal.

: 776-782.

Sharma, T.C and Irwin, R.W. 1976. A model to

determine a subsurface drainage coefficient

for flat land soils.Canadian

Agricultural Engineering. 18(1): 46-48.

Downloads

Submitted

23-02-2023

Published

30-06-2020

How to Cite

A. SAMBAIAH*, M. RAGHU BABU, G. RAVI BABU, G.V. LAKSHMI and S.B.S. NARASIMHA RAO. (2020). DRAINAGE CO-EFFICIENT FOR MOLE DRAINS TO RECLAIM DEGRADED VERTISOLS OF GODAVARI BASIN. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 48(2), 34-44. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/TJRA/article/view/133671