RESPONSE OF GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES TO HIGH AND LOW PHOSPHORUS LEVELS


120 / 31

Authors

  • B.C. AJAY*, A.L. SINGH, S.K. BERA, NARENDRA KUMAR, M.C. DAGLA and K.C. NATARAJ Directorate of Groundnut Research, Junagadh, Gujarat – 362001

Abstract

Groundnut production is often limited by low availability of soil phosphorus. Groundnut genotypes differ in
their P efficiency and dry matter production under low P availability. Two Groundnut genotypes were used in this study
namely ICG(FDRS)-10 (absorb and translocate large amount of P) and JL-24 (not suitable for P insufficient conditions)
to study the response of P availability. Plants were grown in pots with two P levels viz. without P (0 mg P/kg soil, LP)
and with P (40mg P/kg soil, HP) and parameters such as shoot length, root length, root volume, no. of lateral roots,
nodules per plant, stem weight and leaf weight were recorded. Growth of groundnut genotypes was affected at 60
DAE i.e. during pegging stage. Low phosphorus (LP) resulted in reduced stem weight, leaf weight, shoot length and
root volume, nodules per plant but root length and lateral roots were increased. Shoot and root characters were
significantly associated under LP. There is sufficient genetic variability among groundnut genotypes for LP and this
variability is mainly visible during pegging stage.

References

1. Amit, K., Kusuma, P and Gowda, M.V.C. 2009.

2. Genotypic variation for root traits in groundnut

3. germplasm under phosphorus stress conditions. SAT

4. e- journal. 7: 1-4.

5. Boutraa, T. 2009. Growth and carbon partitioning of

6. two genotypes of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) grown

7. with low phosphorus availability. EurAsian Journal of

8. Biosciences. 3: 17-24.

9. Cakmak, I., Hengeler, C and Marchner, H. 1994.

10. Partitioning of shoot and root dry matter and

11. carbohydrates in bean plants suffering from

12. phosphorus, potassium and magnesium deficiency.

13. The Journal of Experimental Botany. 45: 1245-1250.

14. Ciro, A.R., Joao, P.T.W., Silvelena, V and Valdir, J.R.

15. The significance of root growth on cotton

16. nutrition in an acidic low-P soil. Plant and Soil. 212:

17. –190.

18. Fredeen, A.L., Rao, I.M. and Terry, N. 1989. Influence

19. of phosphorus nutrition on growth and carbon

20. partitioning in Glycine max. Plant Physiology. 89:

21. -230.

22. Keerthi singhe, G., Hocking, P.J., Ryan, P.R. and

23. Delhaize, E. 1998. Effect of phosphorus supply on

24. the formation and function of proteoid roots of white

25. lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Plant Cell and Environment.

26. : 467–478.

27. RESPONSE OF GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES TO HIGH AND LOW PHOSPHORUS LEVELS

28. Krishna, K.R. 1997. Phosphorus uptake and

29. utilization efficiency in Groundnut. Peanut Science.

30. : 1-6.

31. Milla, R., Castro-Díez, P., Maestro-Martínez, M and

32. Montserrat-Martí G. 2005. Relationships between

33. phenology and the remobilization of nitrogen,

34. phosphorus and potassium in branches of eight

35. Mediterranean evergreens. New Phytologist.168:

36. –17.

37. Robison, D. 1994. Resource capture by single roots.

38. Resource Capture by Crops. Nottingham University

39. Press, Nottingham. pp. 56–76.

40. Shenoy, V.V and Kalagudi, G.M. 2005. Enhancing

41. plant phosphorus use efficiency for sustainable

42. cropping. Biotechnology Advances. 23: 501-513.

43. Sheoran, R.S., Sharma, H.C., Panuu, P.K and Niwas,

44. R. 2000. Influence of sowing time and phosphorus

45. on, phenology, thermal requirement and yield of

46. fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes.

47. Journal of Spices Aromatic and Crop. 9: 43-46.

48. Singh, A.L. 2011. Physiological basis for realizing

49. yield potentials in groundnut. In: Advances in Plant

50. Physiology [(Hemantranjan, A (Editor.)] Advances in

51. Plant Physiology. 12: 131-242.

52. Singh, A.L., Basu, M.S and Singh, N.B. 2004. In:

53. Mineral Disorders of Groundnut. National Research

54. Centre for Groundnut (ICAR), Junagadh. pp. 85.

55. Sudheer, K.V.S., Narasimha Rao, S.B.S and

56. Radhakrishna Murthy, V. 2011. Behaviour of growth

57. of groundnut under different environments and row

58. spacing. Crop Research. 42: 120-124.

59. Valentine, A.J., Kleinert, A and Benedito, V.A. 2017.

60. Adaptive strategies for nitrogen metabolism in

61. phosphate deficient legume nodules. Plant Science.

62. : 46–52.

63. Xie, Y and Yu, D. 2003. The significance of lateral

64. roots in phosphorus (P) acquisition of water hyacinth

65. (Eichhornia crassipes). Aquatic Botany. 75: 311–321.

66. Zhang, H and Forde, B.G. 1998. An Arabidopsis

67. MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced

68. changes in root architecture. Science. 279: 407–409.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2019

How to Cite

B.C. AJAY*, A.L. SINGH, S.K. BERA, NARENDRA KUMAR, M.C. DAGLA and K.C. NATARAJ. (2019). RESPONSE OF GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES TO HIGH AND LOW PHOSPHORUS LEVELS. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 47(2), 10-16. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/TJRA/article/view/133751