RESPONSE OF GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES TO HIGH AND LOW PHOSPHORUS LEVELS
120 / 31
Abstract
Groundnut production is often limited by low availability of soil phosphorus. Groundnut genotypes differ in
their P efficiency and dry matter production under low P availability. Two Groundnut genotypes were used in this study
namely ICG(FDRS)-10 (absorb and translocate large amount of P) and JL-24 (not suitable for P insufficient conditions)
to study the response of P availability. Plants were grown in pots with two P levels viz. without P (0 mg P/kg soil, LP)
and with P (40mg P/kg soil, HP) and parameters such as shoot length, root length, root volume, no. of lateral roots,
nodules per plant, stem weight and leaf weight were recorded. Growth of groundnut genotypes was affected at 60
DAE i.e. during pegging stage. Low phosphorus (LP) resulted in reduced stem weight, leaf weight, shoot length and
root volume, nodules per plant but root length and lateral roots were increased. Shoot and root characters were
significantly associated under LP. There is sufficient genetic variability among groundnut genotypes for LP and this
variability is mainly visible during pegging stage.
References
1. Amit, K., Kusuma, P and Gowda, M.V.C. 2009.
2. Genotypic variation for root traits in groundnut
3. germplasm under phosphorus stress conditions. SAT
4. e- journal. 7: 1-4.
5. Boutraa, T. 2009. Growth and carbon partitioning of
6. two genotypes of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) grown
7. with low phosphorus availability. EurAsian Journal of
8. Biosciences. 3: 17-24.
9. Cakmak, I., Hengeler, C and Marchner, H. 1994.
10. Partitioning of shoot and root dry matter and
11. carbohydrates in bean plants suffering from
12. phosphorus, potassium and magnesium deficiency.
13. The Journal of Experimental Botany. 45: 1245-1250.
14. Ciro, A.R., Joao, P.T.W., Silvelena, V and Valdir, J.R.
15. The significance of root growth on cotton
16. nutrition in an acidic low-P soil. Plant and Soil. 212:
17. –190.
18. Fredeen, A.L., Rao, I.M. and Terry, N. 1989. Influence
19. of phosphorus nutrition on growth and carbon
20. partitioning in Glycine max. Plant Physiology. 89:
21. -230.
22. Keerthi singhe, G., Hocking, P.J., Ryan, P.R. and
23. Delhaize, E. 1998. Effect of phosphorus supply on
24. the formation and function of proteoid roots of white
25. lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Plant Cell and Environment.
26. : 467–478.
27. RESPONSE OF GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES TO HIGH AND LOW PHOSPHORUS LEVELS
28. Krishna, K.R. 1997. Phosphorus uptake and
29. utilization efficiency in Groundnut. Peanut Science.
30. : 1-6.
31. Milla, R., Castro-Díez, P., Maestro-Martínez, M and
32. Montserrat-Martí G. 2005. Relationships between
33. phenology and the remobilization of nitrogen,
34. phosphorus and potassium in branches of eight
35. Mediterranean evergreens. New Phytologist.168:
36. –17.
37. Robison, D. 1994. Resource capture by single roots.
38. Resource Capture by Crops. Nottingham University
39. Press, Nottingham. pp. 56–76.
40. Shenoy, V.V and Kalagudi, G.M. 2005. Enhancing
41. plant phosphorus use efficiency for sustainable
42. cropping. Biotechnology Advances. 23: 501-513.
43. Sheoran, R.S., Sharma, H.C., Panuu, P.K and Niwas,
44. R. 2000. Influence of sowing time and phosphorus
45. on, phenology, thermal requirement and yield of
46. fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes.
47. Journal of Spices Aromatic and Crop. 9: 43-46.
48. Singh, A.L. 2011. Physiological basis for realizing
49. yield potentials in groundnut. In: Advances in Plant
50. Physiology [(Hemantranjan, A (Editor.)] Advances in
51. Plant Physiology. 12: 131-242.
52. Singh, A.L., Basu, M.S and Singh, N.B. 2004. In:
53. Mineral Disorders of Groundnut. National Research
54. Centre for Groundnut (ICAR), Junagadh. pp. 85.
55. Sudheer, K.V.S., Narasimha Rao, S.B.S and
56. Radhakrishna Murthy, V. 2011. Behaviour of growth
57. of groundnut under different environments and row
58. spacing. Crop Research. 42: 120-124.
59. Valentine, A.J., Kleinert, A and Benedito, V.A. 2017.
60. Adaptive strategies for nitrogen metabolism in
61. phosphate deficient legume nodules. Plant Science.
62. : 46–52.
63. Xie, Y and Yu, D. 2003. The significance of lateral
64. roots in phosphorus (P) acquisition of water hyacinth
65. (Eichhornia crassipes). Aquatic Botany. 75: 311–321.
66. Zhang, H and Forde, B.G. 1998. An Arabidopsis
67. MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced
68. changes in root architecture. Science. 279: 407–409.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.