Abstract views: 31 / PDF downloads: 44


  • B. GOWTHAMI, P. GURUMURTHY*, CH. SUJANI and M. SRIREKHA Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Agricultural College, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Naira- 532 185


A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of biochar on Rabi groundnut nutrition in red sandy
loam soils. Eight treatments viz., control (T1), 100% RDF only (T2), 100% RDF + biochar @ 2 t ha-1 (T3), 100% RDF
+ biochar @ 4 t ha-1 (T4), 100% RDF + biochar @ 6 t ha-1 (T5), 75% RDF + biochar @ 2 t ha-1 (T6), 75% RDF + biochar
@ 4 t ha-1 (T7) and 75% RDF + biochar @ 6 t ha-1 (T8) were laid out in RBD design replicated thrice. Soil application
of biochar significantly increased the N, P2O5, K2O and Ca concentration in both groundnut haulms and pods,
however, Mg and S contents slightly increased by biochar addition. Highest nitrogen content of 2.86% was observed
in groundnut pods when biochar applied @ 6 t ha-1 along with 100% RDF (T5), which found statistically on par with
other treatments except T6 and T1 in which the N was significantly lower than in T5. The N, P2O5 and K2O content were
significantly high in all the treatments when compared to control (T1). Calcium content in groundnut haulm and pods
was significantly higher in biochar applied treatments (T3, T4, T5, T6, T7 and T8) compared to no biochar applied
treatments (T1 and T2). However, calcium content with the biochar application @ 6 t ha-1 (T5 and T8) was significantly
higher when compared to treatments with biochar application @ 2 t ha-1 (T3 and T6). The total uptake of N, P2O5, K2O,
Ca, Mg and S by groundnut crop was significantly influenced by biochar application in combination with 100% RDF
(T5, T4,T3) or 75% RDF (T6, T7 & T8) and RDF alone (T2) when compared to control(T1). The increased nutrient uptake
was found mainly due to enhanced groundnut haulm and pod yield.


Atkinson, C.J., Fitzgerald, J.D and Hipps, N.A. 2010.

Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural

benefits from biochar application to temperate

soils: A review. Plant Soil. 337:1-18.

Agegnehu, G., Bass, A.M., Nelson, P.N., Muirhead,

B., Wright, G and Bird, M.I. 2015. Biochar and

biochar-compost as soil amendments: effects

on peanut yield, soil properties and greenhouse

gas emissions in tropical North Queensland,

Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and

Environment. 213: 72-85.

Budania, K and Janardhan, Y. 2014. Effects of PGPR

blended biochar and different levels of

phosphorus on yield and nutrient uptake by

chickpea. Annals of Agri-Bio Research. 19(3):


Chan, K.Y., Zwieten, L.V., Meszaros. I., Downie, A

and Joseph, S. 2007. Agronomic values of green

waste biochar as a soil amendment. Australian

Journal of Soil Research. 45: 629-634.

Danish, S., Ameer, A., Qureshi, T.I., Younis, U.,

Manzoor, H., Shakeel, A and Ehsanullah, M.

Influence of biochar on growth and

photosynthetic attributes of Triticum aestivum

L. under half and full irrigation. International

Journal of Biosciences. 5(7): 101-108.

Evangelou, M.W.H., Brem, A., Ugoloni, F., Abiven,

S., Schulin, R. 2014. Soil application of biochar

produced from biomass grown on trace element

contaminated land. Journal of Environmental

Management. 146: 100-106.

Jackson, M.L. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice

Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi.

Laxman Rao, P., Jayasree, G., Prathiba, G and Ram

Prakash, T. 2017. Effect of soil amendments

on dry matter production, nutrient uptake and

yield in maize (Zea mays. L). Environment and

Ecology. 35(3A): 1898-1902

Lehmann, J., Da Silva, J.P., Steiner, C., Nehls, T.,

Zech, W and Glaser, B. 2003. Nutrient

availability and leaching in an archaeological

Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon

basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal

amendments. Plant and Soil. 249: 343-357.

Mukherjee, A and Lal, R. 2013. Biochar impacts on

soil physical properties and greenhouse gas

emissions. Agronomy. 3:313–339.

Nadaf, S.A. and Chidanandappa, H.M. 2015. Content

and uptake of macronutrients by groundnut

(Arachis hypogaea L.) as influenced by soil

application of zinc and boron in sandy loam soils

of Karnataka, India. Legume Research. 38 (3):


Nguyen, H., Blair, G and Guppy, C. 2012. Effect of

rice husk biochar and nitrification inhibitortreated

urea on N and other macronutrient

uptake by maize. Capturing opportunities and

overcoming obstacles in Australian Agronomy.

Proceedings of the 16th ASA Conference, 14th -

th October 2012, Armidale, Australia.

Piper, C.S. 1966. Soil and Plant Analysis. Hans

Publishers, Bombay. pp. 368-369.

Thies, E.J and Rillig, M.C. 2009. Characteristics of

biochar: biological properties. In: Biochar for


Environmental Management (Lehmann, J and

Joseph Stephen, Editors). Science and

Technology. 2: 85-102.

Vogel, A.I. 1979. A textbook of quantitative inorganic

analysis, Richard Clay and Company Ltd.,

Great Britain. pp.660.

ANGRAU.2019. Farmers’ Almanac 2018-19.

Published by Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural

University, Lam, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. pp.


Yusof, M.R.M., Ahmed, O.H., King, W.S and Zakry,

F.A.A. 2015. Effects of biochar and chicken litter

ash on selected soil chemical properties and

nutrient uptake by Oryza sativa L. var. MR 219.

International Journal of Biosciences. 6(3): 360-






How to Cite

B. GOWTHAMI, P. GURUMURTHY*, CH. SUJANI and M. SRIREKHA. (2019). EFFECT OF BIOCHAR ON CONTENT AND UPTAKE OF MACRONUTRIENTS BY RABI GROUNDNUT (Arachis hypogaea L.) IN SANDY LOAM SOILS OF NORTH COASTAL ANDHRA PRADESH. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 47(2), 28-35. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/TJRA/article/view/133753