IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF KONANKI WATERSHED PROJECT IN PRAKASAM DISTRICT ON BIO-PHYSICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS


156 / 81

Authors

  • P. RANJIT BASHA, M. SIVA PRASAD, B. VENKATESULU NAIK, R. INIGO ARUL SELVAN and L. SUDHAKARA REDDY* NABARD Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd, (Wholly Owned Subsidiary of NABARD), Zonal Office for Andhra Pradesh and Telangana,Hyderabad– 500 020

Abstract

Konanki mega watershed project was sanctioned in the year 2010-11 and implemented in Prakasam district
till March 2018. Impact study was conducted on environmental and socio-economic indicators by physical visit to the
project area and through bio-physical measurable characteristics by remote sensing and GIS techniques to assess
the outcomes and impact on the watershed community. The total geographical area of the project is 10,574 ha
having undulating terrain with net treatable area of 4,773 ha encompassing seven micro watersheds. The impact of
watershed management interventions were observed in terms of sustaining the productivity of crops under drought
conditions, development of waste lands and current fallow lands, increase in cultivated area, improvement in agrivegetation
and vigour, expansion of water bodies, soil moisture in the profile as a result of the effective in-situ soil
conservation and water conservation activities, increase in milk productivity,etc. The water productivity also found
improved through conservation measures and judicious use of available water resources. Watershed interventions
helped in enhancement of family income especially ofthe marginal farmers (37.1 % rise), small farmers (15% rise)
and landless poor (76.1% rise) of watershed community.

References

1. Anurag, Ankita Saxena and Biswajeet Pradhan.

2. Land use/land cover change modelling: Issues

3. and Challenges. Journal of Rural Development. 37

4. (2):413-424.

5. Aspinall, R.2004.Modelling land use change with

6. generalized linear models- a multi-model analysis of

7. change between 1860 and 2000 in Gallatin valley,

8. Montana. Journal of Environment Management. 72(1):

9. -103.

10. Gao, B.C. 1996.NDWI- A normalized difference water

11. index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water

12. from space. Remote Sensing of Environment. 58(3):

13. -266.

14. Government of Andhra Pradesh.2018. Detailed Project

15. Reports -2018. Retrieved from website (http://

16. iwmp.ap.gov.in/WebReports/UI/DPR/DPR_Project

17. MWS_Area.aspx) on 13.6.2019.

18. Government of Andhra Pradesh. 2018. Glance

19. Reports. Retrieved from website http://iwmp.ap.gov.in/

20. WebReports/UI/Miscellaneous/NewVersion

21. Glance.aspx) on 13.6.2019.

22. Government of Andhra Pradesh. 2018. Natural

23. Resource Management MIS Reports. Retrieved from

24. website (http://iwmp.ap.gov.in/WebReports/UI/

25. Works/NRM_category_new.aspx) on 13.6.2019.

26. GoI.2019. Customized rainfall information system.

27. Hydro Met Division,India Meteorological Department,

28. New Delhi. Retrieved from website (http://

29. hydro.imd.gov.in/hydrometweb/(S(ahenqa55sf1

30. vvi55bjxcrq45))/Rainfallmaps.aspx)on 13.6.2019.

31. Krishna Das.2017. NDVI and NDWI based change

32. detection analysis of Bordoibam Beelmukh wet

33. landscape, Assam using IRS LISS III data. ADBUJournal

34. of Engineering Technology.6 (2): 17-21.

35. Miura,T., Huete,A and Yoshioka,H.2006.An empirical

36. investigation of cross-sensor relationships of NDVI

37. and red/near red-infrared reflectance using EO-

38. hyperion data. Remote Sensing of Environment.

39. (2006):223-236.

40. Palanisami, K and Suresh Kumar, D.2009.Impact of

41. watershed development programmes: Experiences

42. and evidences from Tamil Nadu. Agricultural

43. Economics Research Review.Vol.22 (Conference

44. Number) 2009.pp. 387-396.

45. Vani, V and Pavan Kumar, K.2018.Crop condition

46. assessment of groundnut using time series NDVI data

47. in Anantapur district, Andhra Pradesh. Journal of

48. Rural Development. 37(2):167-178.

49. Vani, V and Mandla, V.R.2017.Comparative study of

50. NDVI and SAVI vegetation indices in Anantapur district

51. semi-arid areas. International Journal of Civil

52. Engineering and Technology. 8(4):559-566.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2019

How to Cite

P. RANJIT BASHA, M. SIVA PRASAD, B. VENKATESULU NAIK, R. INIGO ARUL SELVAN and L. SUDHAKARA REDDY*. (2019). IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF KONANKI WATERSHED PROJECT IN PRAKASAM DISTRICT ON BIO-PHYSICAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASPECTS. The Journal of Research ANGRAU, 47(2), 60-70. https://epubs.icar.org.in/index.php/TJRA/article/view/133758