COMPARISION OF RESPONSE OF GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES AT DIFFERENT PHOSPHORUS LEVELS
107 / 23
Abstract
Low phosphorus (P) availability in soil is one of the limiting factors affecting groundnut productivity by
reducing leaf area and dry weight. This study evaluated groundnut genotypes for their ability to thrive and produce
on calcareous soils with low phosphorus availability. Assessment of shoot biomass, root biomass, shoot Pconcentration,
kernel P-concentration, P-accumulation and yield were completed using three phosphorus levels
and 23 groundnut genotypes. Study was conducted with three phosphorus levels namely no (P0), normal P (P50) and
high P (P100) as the main factor with genotypes as second factor arranged in a factorial completely randomized
design. Significant genotypic differences were observed for the characters studied. Shoot P-concentration and
accumulation increased with increase in phosphorus levels, whereas, root biomass and kernel P-concentration
decreased with increase in phosphorus levels. There was varying response of genotypes for yield, kernel Pconcentration
and accumulation, shoot P-concentration and accumulation, biomass and harvest index. In addition,
genotypes ICG-221, GG-5, TG-37A and FeESG-10 were designated as ‘high yielder–non-responsive’, whereas,
genotypes NRCG-15049, TPG-41, GPBD-4 and NRCG-3498 were identified as ‘low yielder - responsive’. These
genotypes can be used in breeding programs to develop ‘high-yielder– responsive’ genotypes.
References
1. Ajay, B.C., Meena, H.N., Singh, A.L., Bera S.K.,
2. Dagla M.C., Narendra Kumar and
3. Makwana,A.D. 2017. Response of different
4. groundnut genotypes to reduced
5. phosphorous availability. Indian Journal of
6. Genetics and Plant Breeding. 77(1): 105-111.
7. Ajay, B.C., Singh, A.L., Dagla, M.C., Narendra Kumar
8. and Makwhana, A.D. 2013. Genotypic
9. variation and mechanism for P-efficiency in
10. groundnut. In: Plant Nutrition for Nutrient and
11. Food Security. Plant and Soil Series.
12. Proceedings of 17th International Plant
13. Nutrition Colloquium held from 19th -22nd Sept,
14. at Istanbul, Turkey. pp. 410-411.
15. Brgaz, A., Faghire, M., Abdi, N., Farissi, M., Sifi,
16. B., Drevon, J.J., Ikbal, M.C and Ghoulam,
17. C. 2012. Low soil phosphorus availability
18. increases acid phosphatases activities and
19. affects P partitioning in nodules, seeds and
20. rhizosphere of Phaseolus vulgaris L.
21. Agriculture. 2: 139-153.
22. Cho, M.H., Park, H.L and Hahn, T.R. 2015.
23. Engineering leaf carbon metabolism to
24. improve plant productivity. Plant
25. Biotechnology Reporters. 9: 1-10.
26. FAO. 2017. Statistics. Retrieved from website (http:/
27. /www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC) on 3 rd
28. January, 2019.
29. Fiske, C.H and Subbarao, Y. 1925. The colorimetric
30. determination of phosphorus. Journal of
31. Biological Chemistry. 66: 375-400.
32. RESPONSE OF GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES AT DIFFERENT PHOSPHORUS LEVELS
33. Hammond, J.P and White, P.J. 2008. Sucrose
34. transport in the phloem: integrating root
35. responses to phosphorus starvation. Journal
36. of Experimental Botany. 59: 93-109.
37. Hinsinger, H. 2001. Bioavailability of soil inorganic P
38. in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced
39. chemical changes: A review. Plant and Soil.
40. : 173–195.
41. Hopkins, B and Ellsworth, J. 2003. Phosphorus
42. nutrition in potato production. Idaho potato
43. Conference held from January 22nd -23rd,
44. pp. 75-85.
45. Mourice, S.K and Tryphone, G.M. 2012. Evaluation
46. of common bean Phaseolus vulgaris L.
47. genotypes for adaptation to low phosphorus.
48. ISRN Agronomy, 2012: 1-9.
49. Singh, A.L., Chaudhari, V and Ajay, B.C. 2015.
50. Variation in P efficiency among groundnut
51. genotypes in response to P-deficiency. Indian
52. Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding. 75:
53. -10.
54. Yaseen, M and Malhi, S.S. 2009. Variation in yield,
55. phosphorus uptake, and physiological
56. efficiency of wheat genotypes at adequate
57. and stress phosphorus levels in soil.
58. Communications in Soil Science and Plant
59. Analysis.40: 3104–3120.
60. AJAY et al.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the article's copyright until the article is accepted for publication. After acceptance, the author(s) assigns the article's copyright jointly to both the authors and the Publishers of the Journal of Research ANGRAU (ANGRAU) and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.